Primary Prophylaxis for Gastric Variceal Bleeding
The recommended primary prophylaxis for gastric variceal bleeding depends critically on the anatomic location and size of the varices: for GOV1 (gastroesophageal varices along the lesser curvature), follow esophageal variceal prophylaxis guidelines with non-selective beta-blockers or endoscopic variceal ligation; for GOV2 (fundal gastroesophageal varices) and IGV1 (isolated gastric varices in the fundus) at high risk, endoscopic variceal obturation (EVO), balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO), or vascular plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration (PARTO) are superior to observation and should be considered first-line interventions. 1
Classification and Risk Stratification
Gastric varices require anatomic classification before determining prophylaxis strategy:
- GOV1 varices extend along the lesser curvature from the esophagus and represent approximately 74% of gastric varices 1
- GOV2 varices extend into the gastric fundus 1
- IGV1 varices are isolated fundal varices 1
- IGV2 varices occur in other gastric locations or duodenum 1
Risk factors for bleeding include location (IGV1 > GOV2 > GOV1), variceal size >10mm, presence of red color signs on endoscopy, and severe liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh B/C) 1
Treatment Algorithm by Variceal Type
GOV1 Varices (Lesser Curvature)
For GOV1 varices, follow the same prophylaxis strategy as esophageal varices 1:
- Non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) are first-line therapy, with propranolol starting at 40mg twice daily and titrating to 80mg twice daily, targeting a hepatic venous pressure gradient <12 mmHg 1
- Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) is the alternative for patients with contraindications or intolerance to NSBBs 1
- In one Korean study, 64.7% of GOV1 varices disappeared when esophageal varices were eliminated by EVL 1
GOV2 and IGV1 Varices (Fundal Varices)
For fundal varices (GOV2 and IGV1), particularly those >10mm or with high-risk features, interventional therapy is superior to medical management:
Evidence-Based Intervention Hierarchy:
BRTO demonstrates the highest efficacy with a 97.3% clinical success rate in preventing gastric variceal bleeding and achieves complete variceal eradication in 75.6% of patients 1, 2
EVO (endoscopic variceal obturation with cyanoacrylate) is highly effective, reducing bleeding risk to 10% compared to 38% with NSBBs and 53% with observation alone, with a 93% survival rate 1, 2
PARTO (vascular plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration) is a safe alternative that effectively prevents gastric variceal bleeding without serious side effects 1
NSBBs remain an option for patients who cannot undergo interventional procedures, though they are less effective than EVO or BRTO for fundal varices 1
Key Clinical Trial Data:
A randomized study of 89 patients with GOV2 or IGV1 >10mm compared three strategies 1:
- EVO: 10% bleeding rate, 93% survival
- NSBB: 38% bleeding rate, 83% survival
- Observation: 53% bleeding rate, 73% survival
A retrospective analysis of 210 patients confirmed that both EVO and BRTO significantly reduce bleeding compared to observation (19.4% EVO, 7.3% BRTO, 35.1% observation; p=0.001), with BRTO achieving superior complete eradication rates 2
Surveillance Strategy
All cirrhotic patients should undergo endoscopy at diagnosis to identify and classify varices 1:
- No varices detected: repeat endoscopy every 3 years 1
- Small varices: repeat endoscopy yearly 1
- Large varices (grade 3) or grade 2 varices with Child B/C disease: initiate primary prophylaxis 1
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
Do not apply esophageal variceal prophylaxis guidelines uniformly to all gastric varices - GOV2 and IGV1 require different management than GOV1 1
Avoid sclerotherapy for primary prophylaxis - it has been shown to increase mortality and should not be used 1
Do not use shunt therapy (TIPS or surgical shunts) for primary prophylaxis - these are reserved for treatment of acute bleeding or secondary prophylaxis failures 1
Consider local expertise and resources when choosing between EVO, BRTO, and PARTO, as these are technically demanding procedures requiring specialized skills 1
Monitor for variceal recurrence after successful obliteration, as gastric varices can recur and require ongoing surveillance 1
Special Considerations for High-Risk Patients
Patients with decompensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh B/C) and fundal varices with red color signs represent the highest-risk group and should be strongly considered for interventional therapy (BRTO, PARTO, or EVO) rather than medical management alone 1
Complete eradication of gastric varices is the sole independent predictor of preventing future bleeding, making BRTO particularly attractive given its 75.6% complete eradication rate compared to 45.8% with EVO 2