Treatment of Refractory ITP
For adults with refractory ITP who have failed corticosteroids, thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) should be the preferred second-line therapy, with either eltrombopag or romiplostim as first choice, followed by rituximab or splenectomy based on patient-specific factors. 1
Definition of Refractory ITP
- Refractory ITP is defined as failure to respond to corticosteroids after 6-8 weeks of treatment, or requiring continuous corticosteroid therapy to maintain safe platelet counts 1
- Patients requiring on-demand corticosteroid administration after completing first-line induction should be considered non-responders and switched promptly to alternative therapy 1
- Initial corticosteroid treatment should never exceed 6-8 weeks due to severe adverse events including osteoporosis, diabetes, hypertension, and infections 1, 2
Second-Line Treatment Algorithm
First Choice: TPO-RAs (Eltrombopag or Romiplostim)
The American Society of Hematology suggests TPO-RAs over both rituximab and splenectomy for patients who are corticosteroid-dependent or unresponsive 1
Eltrombopag: Oral daily medication achieving platelet responses in 70-80% of patients 3, 4
Romiplostim: Weekly subcutaneous injection with similar efficacy to eltrombopag 1, 5
Key advantages of TPO-RAs: Maintenance therapy with sustained response while on treatment, safer profile than prolonged corticosteroids, allows reduction of other ITP medications 1, 6
Second Choice: Rituximab
Rituximab should be considered for patients who wish to avoid long-term medication or surgery 1
- Achieves short-term responses in 50-60% of patients, with long-term responses in 20-30% 1
- Given as limited course (not maintenance therapy), but half of responders lose response within 1-2 years and require retreatment 6
- Critical safety concerns: Risk of hepatitis B reactivation, multifocal leukoencephalopathy, hypogammaglobulinemia, and reduced vaccine efficacy 1
- Particularly effective in young women with short ITP history 1
Third Choice: Splenectomy
Splenectomy should be delayed for at least 12 months from diagnosis to allow for spontaneous remission or medical therapy response 1, 3
- Initial response rate of 80-85% with sustained long-term responses in 60-66% of patients 1, 3
- Up to 30% of initial responders relapse, typically within first 2 years 1, 3
- Mandatory pre-operative requirements: Pneumococcal, meningococcal C, and Haemophilus influenzae b vaccines at least 4 weeks before surgery 3
- Lifelong risks: 3-fold increased risk of septicemia, 4.5-fold increased risk of pulmonary embolism, 2.7-fold increased risk of venous thromboembolism persisting >10 years 3
- Requires lifelong prophylactic antibiotics and immediate emergency evaluation for any fever >38°C 3
Treatment Selection Framework
The 2019 ASH guidelines provide conditional recommendations suggesting: 1
- TPO-RAs over rituximab (for sustained response while on therapy)
- Rituximab over splenectomy (to avoid irreversible surgery)
- TPO-RAs or splenectomy as equivalent options (based on patient values)
Decision factors favoring each option:
Choose TPO-RAs if: Patient requires ongoing medication management, wishes to avoid surgery, needs sustained platelet response, or has failed rituximab 1, 6
Choose rituximab if: Patient values avoiding long-term daily medication, accepts risk of retreatment, or wishes to delay/avoid splenectomy 1, 6
Choose splenectomy if: Patient values achieving durable response without long-term medication, has failed medical therapies, or has severe refractory disease requiring definitive treatment 1, 3
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Excessive corticosteroid duration: Never continue corticosteroids beyond 6-8 weeks as first-line therapy due to cumulative toxicity including weight gain, diabetes, osteoporosis, and infections 1
- Premature splenectomy: Avoid splenectomy before 12 months unless severe bleeding unresponsive to medical therapies, as spontaneous remissions can occur 1, 3
- Underuse of TPO-RAs: These agents should be considered early rather than exhausting multiple other therapies first, given their superior efficacy and safety profile 1, 6
Alternative Third-Line Options
For patients failing TPO-RAs, rituximab, and splenectomy, consider: 1, 7