What are the common causes of kidney infarction?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 8, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Causes of Kidney Infarction

Renal artery lesions are the most frequent cause of kidney infarction, accounting for approximately 81% of cases, followed by cardioembolic sources (particularly atrial fibrillation) at 9-56% depending on the population studied. 1, 2

Primary Etiologic Categories

Kidney infarction results from acute disruption of renal blood flow through three main mechanisms 1, 2:

1. Renal Artery Lesions (Most Common: 81%)

This is the predominant cause and requires extensive arterial exploration to identify the underlying vascular disease. 1

  • Atherosclerotic disease accounts for 34% of renal artery lesions 1
  • Dissecting hematoma represents 23% of arterial lesions 1
  • Fibromuscular dysplasia causes 19% of arterial lesions 1
  • Renal artery thrombosis occurs in 7.5% of cases 2
  • Renal artery occlusion was observed in 40% of patients in one series 1

2. Cardioembolic Sources (9-56%)

Atrial fibrillation is the single most important cardioembolic risk factor, present in 28-55% of renal infarction cases. 2, 3, 4

  • Atrial fibrillation serves as the primary embolic source 2, 3, 4
  • Valvular heart disease contributes to embolic risk 4
  • Ischemic heart disease increases thromboembolic potential 4
  • Prior thromboembolic events occur in 11% of patients 4

3. Hypercoagulable States (6%)

Thrombophilic conditions account for approximately 6% of renal infarctions. 2

  • Coagulopathies predispose to thrombotic events 2, 4
  • Estroprogestinic therapy was present in 11% of one case series 4
  • Sickle cell anemia can cause multiple "slit-like" focal infarcts with enlarged kidneys 5

4. Idiopathic (4-30%)

When extensive workup fails to identify a cause, only 4-30% of cases remain truly idiopathic, with the wide range reflecting thoroughness of investigation. 1, 2

Associated Risk Factors

Beyond the primary causes, several conditions increase susceptibility 4:

  • Hypertension is present in 44% of patients 4
  • Obesity affects 33% of patients 4
  • Peripheral vascular disease occurs in 17% 4
  • Smoking is present in 17% 4
  • Diabetes mellitus affects 11% 4

Traumatic Causes

Trauma typically causes unilateral global infarction patterns, distinguishing it from other etiologies. 5

  • Trauma-related infarction presents as unilateral global involvement 5
  • This contrasts with embolic causes, which produce multifocal bilateral involvement 5

Clinical Implications

The distribution pattern on imaging helps identify the underlying mechanism: multifocal bilateral infarcts suggest embolism, while unilateral global infarcts suggest trauma or arterial dissection. 5

  • Right and left kidneys are equally affected overall 1
  • Embolic sources cause multifocal involvement of both kidneys 5
  • Arterial lesions may present with either focal or global patterns 1, 5

Critical Diagnostic Pitfall

A significant proportion of renal infarctions are initially misdiagnosed (often as pyelonephritis), leading to delayed treatment and worse outcomes. 3, 4 The key distinguishing feature is that 72% of patients present with acute flank pain, but unlike pyelonephritis, they typically lack fever and pyuria 4.

References

Research

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Renal Infarction.

American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2016

Research

Cardioembolic-related renal infarction.

Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2022

Research

Acute renal infarction: a single center experience.

Journal of nephrology, 2017

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.