What are the expected bone marrow findings in a patient with suspected Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) presenting with pancytopenia and macrocytic anemia?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 9, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Expected Bone Marrow Findings in Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

In a patient with suspected MDS presenting with pancytopenia and macrocytic anemia, expect bone marrow hypercellularity (in most cases) with dysplastic changes affecting ≥10% of cells in one or more myeloid lineages, variable blast percentage (<20%), and cytogenetic abnormalities in 50-60% of cases. 1

Cellularity Patterns

  • Most MDS cases demonstrate hypercellular or normocellular bone marrow despite peripheral cytopenias, reflecting ineffective hematopoiesis 1
  • Hypocellular MDS occurs in a minority (approximately 10-15% of cases), characterized by marrow cellularity ≤25%, more severe cytopenias (median platelets 28,000/μL vs 75,000/μL), and marked macrocytosis (MCV 107 fL vs 97 fL) 2
  • Hypocellular MDS typically shows normal cytogenetics (100% vs 77% in hypercellular MDS) and may be difficult to distinguish from aplastic anemia 2

Morphologic Dysplasia Requirements

The diagnostic threshold requires dysplasia in ≥10% of nucleated cells within the affected lineage(s). 1 Proper assessment mandates:

  • Counting ≥500 cells in bone marrow smears, including at least 100 erythroblasts and 30 megakaryocytes 1
  • May-Grünwald-Giemsa and iron staining for comprehensive evaluation 1

Erythroid Dysplasia Features

  • Nuclear abnormalities: Binuclearity, internuclear bridging, irregular nuclear edges, megaloblastoid changes 1
  • Cytoplasmic findings: Ring sideroblasts (≥15% defines RARS subtype), cytoplasmic inclusions 1
  • Erythroid hyperplasia may be prominent, with nucleated red cells comprising >50% of marrow cellularity in some cases 3

Myeloid Dysplasia Features

  • Nuclear abnormalities: Hypolobation (pseudo-Pelger-Huët), hypersegmentation, bizarre nuclear shapes 1
  • Cytoplasmic findings: Hypogranulation/degranulation 1
  • Flow cytometry shows decreased CD10+ granulocytes, increased CD56+ granulocytes, and elevated immature-to-mature cell ratios 4

Megakaryocytic Dysplasia Features

  • Characteristic findings: Large monolobular forms, small binucleated elements, micromegakaryocytes, hypolobated nuclei 1
  • Megakaryocytic dysplasia is often better evaluated on bone marrow sections than smears 1

Blast Percentage

Blast enumeration is critical for accurate MDS classification and prognostication. 1

  • <5% blasts: Refractory cytopenia with unilineage dysplasia (RCUD), RARS, or refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (RCMD) 1
  • 5-9% blasts: RAEB-1 1
  • 10-19% blasts: RAEB-2 1
  • Myeloblast definition: High nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, visible nucleoli, fine nuclear chromatin, variable cytoplasmic basophilia, with or without granules/Auer rods but no Golgi zone 1

Cytogenetic Abnormalities

Cytogenetic analysis should be performed in all suspected MDS cases, analyzing ≥20 metaphases when possible. 1

Most Common Abnormalities

  • del(5q): 10-15% of cases 1
  • Monosomy 7 or del(7q): 10% 1
  • Trisomy 8: Common, though not listed as presumptive evidence alone 1
  • del(20q): Frequent but not diagnostic alone 1

Diagnostic Significance

  • Chromosomal abnormalities occur in 50-60% of MDS patients 1
  • Specific recurrent abnormalities (del(5q), monosomy 7/del(7q), i(17q)/t(17p), del(11q), del(12p), del(13q), del(9q), and specific balanced translocations) provide presumptive evidence of MDS even with <10% dysplasia 1
  • Normal karyotype is more common in hypoplastic MDS (100% vs 77%) 2

Flow Cytometry Findings

Flow cytometry abnormalities involving one or more myeloid lineages are suggestive but not diagnostic of MDS alone. 1

  • Erythroid abnormalities: Higher proportions of immature cells, decreased CD71 expression on nucleated red cells 4
  • Myeloid abnormalities: Lower CD10+ granulocytes, higher CD56+ granulocytes, increased immature-to-mature cell ratios 4
  • ≥3 phenotypic abnormalities involving myeloid lineages can be considered indicative of MDS when combined with other findings 1

Special Patterns and Pitfalls

Abnormally Localized Immature Precursors (ALIP)

  • ALIP presence indicates worse prognosis with increased propensity for leukemic transformation 5
  • Must distinguish true myeloid/monocytic ALIP from benign erythroid or megakaryocytic aggregates using immunohistochemistry 5

Common Diagnostic Challenges

  • Hypoplastic MDS vs. aplastic anemia: Hypoplastic MDS shows dysplasia ≥10%, may have cytogenetic abnormalities, and lacks response to immunosuppressive therapy 2
  • MDS-U classification: Used for cases with pancytopenia and unilineage dysplasia, or <10% dysplasia with diagnostic cytogenetic abnormalities 1
  • If unilineage dysplasia only without diagnostic cytogenetics, blasts <5%, and ring sideroblasts <15%, observe for 6 months with repeat bone marrow before confirming MDS diagnosis 1

Bone Marrow Architecture

  • Immunohistochemistry on bone marrow biopsies helps identify dysplastic features (mononuclear megakaryocytes, Pelger-Huët neutrophils, binuclear erythroblasts) and assess microarchitecture alterations 5
  • Reticulin staining should be performed to assess for fibrosis 5

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.