Laboratory Testing for Potential Liver Disease
Initial investigation for potential liver disease should include bilirubin, albumin, ALT, ALP, and GGT, together with a full blood count if not already performed within the previous 12 months. 1
First-Line Core Laboratory Panel
The British Society of Gastroenterology establishes a standardized initial panel that serves as the foundation for evaluating suspected liver disease:
Basic Liver Chemistry Tests
- Bilirubin - assesses hepatic excretory function and cholestasis 1
- Albumin - reflects hepatic synthetic function and chronicity of disease 1
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) - primary marker of hepatocellular injury 1
- Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) - indicates cholestatic or infiltrative disease 1
- Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) - increases sensitivity for detecting alcohol-related and fatty liver disease, and is associated with increased liver and all-cause mortality 1
- Full blood count - platelet count helps assess for portal hypertension and advanced fibrosis 1
Critical Addition: AST for Fibrosis Assessment
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) should be obtained reflexively on the same sample when ALT or GGT is abnormal to calculate the AST:ALT ratio 1
- An AST:ALT ratio >1 indicates advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, even when both values are within normal reference ranges 1
- This ratio is essential for risk stratification and referral decisions 1
Second-Line Etiologic Testing
Once abnormal liver tests are confirmed, proceed with a comprehensive etiologic screen based on the clinical context:
Viral Hepatitis Serologies
- Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B core IgM 2
- Hepatitis C antibody (HCV Ab) 2
- For marked elevations (ALT >1000 U/L), add hepatitis A, hepatitis E, and cytomegalovirus serologies 2
Autoimmune Markers
- Serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) - elevated in autoimmune hepatitis 2
- Antinuclear antibody (ANA), anti-smooth muscle antibody (ASMA), anti-liver kidney microsome (LKM) antibodies 1, 2
- Antimitochondrial antibody (AMA) - for primary biliary cholangitis 1
Iron Studies
- Ferritin and transferrin saturation 2
- Transferrin saturation >45% suggests hemochromatosis and warrants genetic testing 2
- Isolated elevated ferritin without elevated transferrin saturation does not indicate hemochromatosis 2
Metabolic Parameters (for NAFLD Assessment)
- Fasting glucose or hemoglobin A1c 2
- Lipid panel (triglycerides, cholesterol) 2
- Assessment for metabolic syndrome components (waist circumference, BMI, blood pressure) 1
Additional Metabolic Testing (When Core Panel Negative)
- Alpha-1-antitrypsin level - for alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency 1
- Thyroid function tests - thyroid disease can cause liver enzyme elevation 1, 2
- Ceruloplasmin (age >3 and <40 years) with 24-hour urinary copper - for Wilson's disease 1, 2
- Creatine kinase - to exclude muscle source of transaminase elevation 2
Clinical History Requirements
Obtain specific details that guide testing interpretation:
- Alcohol consumption - quantify grams per day (>20-30 g/day suggests alcohol-related disease) 1, 2
- Medication review - identify hepatotoxic drugs (corticosteroids, amiodarone, methotrexate, tamoxifen, valproic acid) 1, 2
- Risk factors for viral hepatitis - injection drug use, blood transfusions before 1992, country of origin, sexual history 1, 2
- Metabolic syndrome features - obesity, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia 1, 2
- Family history - hemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, autoimmune conditions 2
Non-Invasive Fibrosis Assessment
After establishing etiology, assess fibrosis stage using validated scores:
First-Line Fibrosis Scores
- FIB-4 score - values <1.3 indicate low risk of advanced fibrosis (<2.0 for age >65 years) 1
- NAFLD Fibrosis Score - values ≤-1.455 indicate low risk (≤-0.12 for age >65 years) 1
- These should be automatically calculated and reported in primary care for patients with metabolic risk factors 1
Second-Line Fibrosis Tests (When Scores Indeterminate)
- Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) test - serum biomarker panel 1
- Transient elastography (FibroScan) - values >7.8 kPa suggest advanced fibrosis 1
- ARFI elastography - cut-offs vary by manufacturer 1
Imaging Recommendations
- Abdominal ultrasound with Doppler is the initial imaging modality of choice, with 84.8% sensitivity and 93.6% specificity for moderate to severe hepatic steatosis 2
- Ultrasound also excludes biliary obstruction, focal lesions, and assesses for cirrhosis features 1, 2
- CT abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast may be considered for moderate to severe elevations or when ultrasound is inadequate 2
Monitoring Strategy
Important caveat: The goal is etiologic diagnosis, not monitoring alone, as 84% of abnormal tests remain elevated at 1 month and 75% at 2 years 2. Repeat testing without pursuing diagnosis is inefficient.
- For confirmed abnormal results, proceed directly to etiologic testing rather than simply repeating basic tests 2
- Monthly clinical evaluation during treatment includes questioning about symptoms of hepatotoxicity and physical assessment 1
Referral Criteria
Immediate Specialist Referral
- Unexplained clinical jaundice 2
- Suspicion of hepatic or biliary malignancy 2
- Evidence of hepatitis B, HCV, autoimmune hepatitis, or hemochromatosis 2
- Findings concerning for cirrhosis - thrombocytopenia, AST>ALT, hypoalbuminemia, elevated INR 1
Routine Hepatology Referral
- Transaminases elevated ≥6 months without identified cause 2
- Negative extended liver aetiology screen even without NAFLD risk factors 1
- Evidence of synthetic dysfunction (low albumin, elevated INR) 2
- High-risk fibrosis scores requiring further evaluation 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not rely on GGT alone - while it increases sensitivity, it has lower specificity and higher false-positive rates 1
- Do not assume isolated ferritin elevation indicates hemochromatosis - transferrin saturation >45% is required 2
- Do not use AST:ALT ratio in isolation - it retains utility even when both values are normal 1
- Do not screen unselected general populations - non-invasive fibrosis tests should be used in at-risk populations (metabolic risk factors, harmful alcohol use) where prevalence justifies testing 1
- Do not delay etiologic workup - prolonged monitoring without diagnosis is not cost-effective given persistence of abnormalities 2