MRI Without Contrast for Suspected Severe Spinal Canal Stenosis
For an older adult with worsening spondylolisthesis at L4-L5 and suspected severe spinal canal stenosis requiring emergent MRI, perform MRI lumbar spine WITHOUT IV contrast. 1
Primary Recommendation
MRI lumbar spine without IV contrast is the appropriate initial imaging modality for evaluating suspected severe spinal canal stenosis with spondylolisthesis. 1 This approach provides excellent soft-tissue contrast and accurately depicts lumbar pathology, including the thecal sac and neural structures, while avoiding unnecessary contrast administration. 1
When to Add Contrast
Contrast should be reserved for specific clinical scenarios that are NOT present in straightforward degenerative stenosis with spondylolisthesis:
- Suspected malignancy (history of cancer, unexplained weight loss, age >50 with failure to improve after 1 month) 1
- Suspected infection (fever, IV drug use, recent infection, immunosuppression) 1
- Suspected inflammation (inflammatory arthropathies) 1
MRI with and without IV contrast may be helpful to delineate the etiology when underlying malignancy, infection, or inflammation is clinically suspected, but this is not indicated for routine degenerative stenosis evaluation. 1
Key Technical Considerations
What MRI Without Contrast Provides
The noncontrast MRI protocol delivers all necessary diagnostic information for surgical planning in degenerative stenosis:
- Accurate assessment of spinal canal patency and degree of stenosis 1
- Visualization of disc degeneration and herniation 1
- Evaluation of neural foraminal narrowing 1
- Assessment of thecal sac compression 1
- Identification of nerve root compression 1
- Evaluation of vertebral marrow signal 1
Why Contrast Is Not Needed
MRI with IV contrast alone is not useful as an initial study because precontrast sequences are required for comparison to confirm areas of suspected abnormality. 1 In degenerative stenosis with spondylolisthesis, the pathology is primarily mechanical compression from bone, disc, and ligamentous structures—all of which are optimally visualized without contrast. 1
Clinical Context for Emergent Imaging
The designation of "emergent MRI" suggests concern for:
- Cauda equina syndrome (new urinary retention/incontinence, bilateral weakness, saddle anesthesia) 1, 2
- Progressive neurologic deficit (rapidly worsening motor weakness, multifocal deficits) 1, 2
For suspected cauda equina syndrome or progressive neurologic deficit, MRI lumbar spine without IV contrast is the most useful initial study because of its ability to accurately depict soft-tissue pathology, assess vertebral marrow, and assess spinal canal patency. 1 A prospective cohort study recommends urgent MRI assessment in all patients who present with new-onset urinary symptoms in the context of low back pain or sciatica. 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Unnecessary Contrast Administration
There is no relevant literature to support the use of CT lumbar spine with IV contrast in the evaluation of spinal stenosis. 1 Similarly, routine use of MRI contrast for degenerative stenosis adds cost, time, and potential contrast-related risks without diagnostic benefit. 1
Alternative Imaging Considerations
If MRI is contraindicated (pacemaker, severe claustrophobia, metallic implants):
- CT myelography can assess spinal canal/thecal sac patency and neural foramina, though it requires lumbar puncture for intrathecal contrast injection 1
- CT without IV contrast can answer whether cauda equina compression is present, with 50% thecal sac effacement predicting significant stenosis 1
Surgical Planning Implications
For patients being evaluated as surgical candidates with spondylolisthesis and stenosis:
- Flexion-extension radiographs are complementary to assess segmental motion, which is important in surgical management of spondylolisthesis 1
- CT without IV contrast may be useful for preoperative planning to delineate osseous margins and aid in trajectory planning for hardware fixation 1
MRI without contrast remains the primary modality for identifying actionable pain generators that could be targeted for intervention or surgery. 1