In a patient with suspected placental abruption, which of the following statements is true regarding management?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 14, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Placental Abruption: Correct Statement

The correct answer is (b): Vital signs should be checked to assess for circulatory stability. This is the fundamental first step in managing placental abruption, as maternal hemodynamic status directly determines the urgency and mode of delivery 1, 2.

Why Each Statement is True or False

Statement B (CORRECT): Vital Signs for Circulatory Stability

  • Establishing maternal hemodynamic stability is the cornerstone of placental abruption management 1, 2
  • The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends immediate assessment of vital signs, blood loss, and urine output to determine clinical severity 1
  • Maternal hemodynamic instability mandates proceeding to immediate delivery regardless of gestational age 1, 2
  • Large-bore intravenous access should be established immediately upon presentation, with early activation of massive transfusion protocol if significant bleeding is present 1, 2

Statement A (INCORRECT): Ultrasound Dependency

  • The diagnosis of placental abruption is primarily clinical, not ultrasound-dependent 3, 4, 5
  • Ultrasound has limited sensitivity for detecting abruption and cannot rule out the diagnosis 3
  • Clinical manifestations including vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, uterine contractions, and abnormal fetal heart rate patterns are the diagnostic foundation 4, 5
  • Ultrasound may show retroplacental hematoma or placental separation, but absence of these findings does not exclude abruption 3

Statement C (INCORRECT): Amniotomy Contraindication

  • Amniotomy is NOT contraindicated in placental abruption; in fact, it may be beneficial in certain scenarios 3
  • When vaginal delivery is planned (particularly in cases of fetal demise), amniotomy can facilitate labor progression 3
  • The key is that amniotomy decisions depend on the overall clinical picture: maternal stability, fetal status, and gestational age 3, 4

Statement D (INCORRECT): Cesarean for Fetal Demise

  • In cases of fetal demise from placental abruption, vaginal delivery is actually preferable, not cesarean 3
  • Cesarean delivery is indicated for fetal compromise (when the fetus is alive) or maternal instability requiring rapid delivery 1
  • When fetal death has occurred, vaginal delivery avoids the additional maternal morbidity of surgery while allowing for adequate management of potential disseminated intravascular coagulopathy 3, 6
  • Emergency cesarean is reserved for maternal hemodynamic instability or uncontrolled hemorrhage, not simply for fetal demise 1, 2

Clinical Management Algorithm

Based on maternal hemodynamic status:

  • Unstable patient: Immediate delivery (cesarean if rapid delivery needed) regardless of fetal status or gestational age 1, 2
  • Stable patient with live fetus: Mode and timing based on gestational age, fetal heart rate pattern, and severity of bleeding 4, 5
  • Stable patient with fetal demise: Vaginal delivery preferred with aggressive management of coagulopathy 3, 6

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never delay treatment waiting for laboratory results - initiate transfusion protocols based on clinical presentation first 1
  • Never perform digital cervical examination until placenta previa is excluded, as this can trigger catastrophic hemorrhage 7
  • Maintain maternal temperature above 36°C as clotting factors function poorly at lower temperatures 1, 2, 7
  • Monitor fibrinogen levels closely as declining levels indicate consumption and predict need for transfusion 1

References

Guideline

Management of Placental Abruption

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Abruptio Placenta After Trauma in the 2nd Trimester

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Placental abruption.

Obstetrics and gynecology, 2006

Research

Placental Abruption: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management.

Clinical obstetrics and gynecology, 2025

Guideline

Management and Treatment of Placenta Previa

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.