What is the risk of lead exposure in infants living in homes built before 1978 and what are the recommended screening tests for infants under 6 years old?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 15, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Homes Built Before 1978 Require Lead Risk Assessment in Infants

All homes built before 1978 should be presumed to contain lead-based paint hazards and warrant blood lead screening in infants and young children, with homes built before 1960 posing the highest risk. 1

Housing Age and Lead Hazard Risk

The year 1978 is the critical cutoff because lead-based paint was banned from residential use in the United States at that time. 1, 2 However, the risk stratifies significantly by decade:

  • Pre-1940 housing: 67% contain one or more lead paint hazards 1
  • 1940-1959 housing: 39% contain lead paint hazards 1
  • 1960-1977 housing: 11.4% contain lead paint hazards 1
  • 1978-1998 housing: Only 2.7% contain lead paint hazards 1

Houses built through the 1950s used paint with the highest lead concentrations, making pre-1960 homes particularly dangerous. 1

Why This Matters for Infant Screening

Infants and toddlers face peak exposure risk between 6-36 months of age due to normal mouthing behaviors, increasing mobility, and more efficient lead absorption compared to older children and adults. 1 Blood lead levels typically:

  • Increase rapidly between 6-12 months of age
  • Peak between 18-36 months of age
  • Then gradually decrease 1

Iron deficiency further increases lead absorption in young children, compounding the risk. 1

Screening Recommendations

Children living in pre-1978 housing should be considered high-risk and require blood lead screening, particularly those under 6 years of age. 2, 3 The screening is most critical for:

  • Infants and children in homes built before 1960 (highest risk) 1
  • Low-income families in older housing 4
  • Homes undergoing or recently completing renovation, repair, or painting activities 2
  • Homes with deteriorated paint or visible paint chips 1

Critical Exposure Pathways in Pre-1978 Homes

House dust contaminated with lead-based paint particles is the primary exposure pathway, not the intact paint itself. 1 Key sources include:

  • Deteriorated interior and exterior paint releasing fine lead dust 1
  • Window troughs and sills (often more contaminated than floors due to friction and higher exterior paint lead content) 1
  • Soil contaminated by exterior lead paint, tracked indoors 1
  • Dust generated during renovation, repair, or painting activities 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not assume a home is safe simply because paint appears intact—lack of visible deterioration does not ensure absence of lead-contaminated dust. 1

Renovation and repair activities in pre-1978 homes dramatically increase exposure risk, even when performed by well-intentioned homeowners or tenants. 2 In New York State, 66% of lead-exposure cases from renovation were performed by resident owners or tenants, not professional contractors. 2

Formula-fed infants face additional risk if tap water contains lead from old plumbing, as water can contribute approximately 20% of blood lead levels when concentrations exceed 5 ppb. 1

National Housing Data Context

As of 2011, approximately 37 million (35%) of 106 million U.S. housing units contain lead-based paint. 1 Of the 24 million units with significant lead-based paint hazards, 1.2 million house low-income families with children under 6 years of age. 4

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.