What is the recommended surgical procedure for a young to middle-aged adult with suspected otosclerosis and conductive hearing loss?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 21, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Stapedotomy for Otosclerosis

Stapedotomy is the recommended surgical procedure for young to middle-aged adults with otosclerosis and conductive hearing loss, offering superior high-frequency hearing outcomes and lower complication rates compared to stapedectomy. 1

Diagnostic Confirmation

Before proceeding to surgery, confirm the diagnosis with:

  • High-resolution CT of the temporal bone as the first-line imaging modality to identify otospongiosis (otosclerosis), ossicular chain abnormalities, and rule out other causes of conductive hearing loss 2
  • Comprehensive audiologic evaluation documenting air-conduction and bone-conduction thresholds to establish baseline hearing and quantify the air-bone gap 3

CT provides excellent delineation of the ossicular chain and bony labyrinth, which is essential for surgical planning in otosclerosis. 2 MRI is insufficient for evaluating the bony details needed in conductive hearing loss evaluation. 2

Surgical Approach: Stapedotomy vs Stapedectomy

Stapedotomy is the preferred technique based on comparative evidence:

  • Better high-frequency hearing preservation with stapedotomy compared to stapedectomy 1
  • Lower complication rates with small fenestra stapedotomy 1
  • Comparable overall hearing improvement between both techniques, with significant air-bone gap closure in 70-85% of patients achieving ABG ≤20 dB 3, 4
  • Long-term stability of hearing outcomes with both procedures 1

While stapedotomy is favored by most surgeons, if intraoperative findings necessitate conversion to stapedectomy, surgeons should proceed confidently as both techniques yield favorable outcomes. 5

Expected Outcomes

Patients can anticipate:

  • Mean air-conduction threshold improvement of approximately 18-24 dB postoperatively 3, 4
  • 61-70% achieving complete ABG closure (<10 dB) at speech frequencies (0.5,1,2,4 kHz) 4
  • Over 94% experiencing hearing improvement of some degree 4
  • Significant improvement in speech recognition thresholds 5

Complication Profile

Stapedotomy is a safe procedure with:

  • Low overall complication rates (approximately 13%) 4
  • Tympanic membrane perforation as the most common complication (5.6%) 4
  • Negligible risk of sensorineural hearing loss when performed by experienced surgeons 3
  • No increased risk of vertigo or other vestibular complications compared to stapedectomy 5

Special Considerations

For patients with mixed hearing loss (conductive plus sensorineural components):

  • Stapedotomy remains effective and can improve both air-conduction and bone-conduction thresholds 3
  • Preoperative counseling should address realistic expectations, as the sensorineural component will persist 3

For very far-advanced otosclerosis with profound hearing loss:

  • Stapedotomy with well-fitted hearing aids should be the initial treatment approach, as it is simpler, safer, and lower cost than cochlear implantation 6
  • Cochlear implantation remains an option if stapedotomy fails to provide adequate benefit 6
  • Temporal bone high-resolution CT is mandatory in these cases to confirm otosclerosis and rule out other pathology 6

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely on MRI for preoperative evaluation of conductive hearing loss; CT temporal bone is essential 2
  • Do not proceed without comprehensive audiometry establishing baseline air and bone conduction thresholds 3
  • Do not dismiss patients with mixed hearing loss as poor surgical candidates; they can achieve significant benefit from stapedotomy 3
  • Ensure adequate surgical experience, as outcomes are highly dependent on surgical technique and minimizing trauma 4

References

Research

Stapedectomy Versus Stapedotomy.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America, 2018

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Stapedotomy or Stapedectomy: Does It Really Matter?

International archives of otorhinolaryngology, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.