What is the management approach for a patient with a tracheal injury based on the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grading system?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 22, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

AAST Grading of Tracheal Injury

I cannot provide the AAST grading system for tracheal injury because the evidence provided does not contain the AAST tracheal injury classification scale. The available evidence only includes the AAST liver trauma classification 1, which is not applicable to tracheal injuries.

What the Evidence Does Provide

Management Approach for Tracheal Injuries

While the AAST grading system is not available in the evidence, I can outline the management principles for tracheal injuries based on the available literature:

Conservative Management is Preferred for Most Iatrogenic Tracheal Injuries

Non-surgical treatment should be the initial approach for most post-intubation tracheal lacerations (PITLs), with surgery reserved only for injuries involving esophageal damage or mediastinitis 2.

Morphological Classification for Treatment Decisions

A proposed classification system for PITLs guides non-surgical treatment 2:

  • Level I injuries (mucosal/submucosal involvement without mediastinal emphysema): Managed conservatively with 100% success 2

  • Level II injuries (tracheal lesion to muscular wall with subcutaneous/mediastinal emphysema, no esophageal injury): Successfully treated non-surgically in all cases 2

  • Level IIIA injuries (complete tracheal wall laceration with herniation but no esophageal injury): Can be managed conservatively in selected institutions with adequate respiratory status 2

  • Level IIIB injuries (any laceration with esophageal injury or mediastinitis): Requires immediate surgical repair 2

Pediatric Considerations

Conservative management is particularly effective in children with non-penetrating tracheobronchial injuries, avoiding open surgical procedures in the majority of cases 3. All eight pediatric patients in one series healed spontaneously without initial open surgery, though 62.5% developed some degree of tracheal stenosis requiring monitoring 3.

Emergency Airway Management

Airway control and appropriate ventilation represent the key aspects of emergency management for tracheal trauma 4. Endotracheal intubation or alternative airway management should be performed without delay in the presence of airway obstruction, altered consciousness (GCS ≤8), hypoventilation, or hypoxemia 1.

Diagnostic Approach

Laryngoscopy, flexible and/or rigid bronchoscopy, and computed tomography of the chest are the procedures of choice for definitive diagnosis 4. Early diagnostic evaluation is critical for successful treatment 5.

Critical Gap in Evidence

To properly answer your question about AAST grading of tracheal injury, you would need access to the official AAST Organ Injury Scale for tracheal/tracheobronchial injuries, which typically grades injuries from I to V based on anatomical severity. This classification system is not present in the provided evidence.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Tracheal lacerations after endotracheal intubation: a proposed morphological classification to guide non-surgical treatment.

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2010

Research

Traumatic tracheal injury in children: a case series supporting conservative management.

International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2015

Research

Tracheal damage.

B-ENT, 2016

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.