What is the estimated radiation exposure for a patient undergoing a 30-minute stroke thrombectomy procedure using a biplane angiography machine?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 23, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Radiation Exposure During 30-Minute Stroke Thrombectomy with Biplane Angiography

For a 30-minute stroke thrombectomy using biplane angiography, you can expect a patient radiation exposure of approximately 91-148 Gy·cm² (dose-area product/KAP), which translates to an effective dose of roughly 18-30 mSv—equivalent to 6-10 years of natural background radiation. 1

Patient Radiation Dose Estimates

The most robust contemporary data comes from a 2019 multicenter study of 1,096 thrombectomy patients, which established the 75th percentile achievable level at 148 Gy·cm² for biplane systems with radiation dose-reduction systems (RDS). 1 This represents the benchmark for modern practice.

Dose Ranges by Equipment Type

  • Biplane systems with RDS: Median DAP of 91 Gy·cm² (air kerma 0.46 Gy), with 75th percentile at 148 Gy·cm² and 0.73 Gy respectively 1
  • Biplane systems without RDS: Median DAP of 140 Gy·cm² (air kerma 0.97 Gy)—representing 35% higher DAP and 53% higher air kerma compared to RDS-equipped systems 1
  • Skin equivalent dose range: 0.16-4.80 Gy, with mean of 1.00 Gy and 75th percentile of 1.24 Gy 2

Converting to Effective Dose

Using the ACC/AHA conversion factor of 0.20 mSv per Gy·cm² for thoracic/head imaging, a typical 30-minute thrombectomy delivers: 3

  • With RDS: 91 Gy·cm² = approximately 18 mSv effective dose
  • Without RDS: 140 Gy·cm² = approximately 28 mSv effective dose
  • Upper achievable limit: 148 Gy·cm² = approximately 30 mSv effective dose

Clinical Context and Risk Assessment

These doses fall well below the 100 mSv threshold where detectable increased cancer risk begins, according to ACC guidelines. 3, 4 To contextualize:

  • Natural background radiation in the US averages 3 mSv per year 3, 4
  • A typical thrombectomy (18-30 mSv) equals 6-10 years of background radiation
  • This is comparable to 2-3 cardiac CT scans (10-21 mSv each) 4
  • Standard diagnostic coronary angiography delivers 5-6 mSv 4

Deterministic Skin Injury Risk

The threshold for skin reactions is 3 Gy absorbed dose, which was exceeded in only 6% of thrombectomy cases in a 50-patient German study. 2 However, 36% of patients received 1-3 Gy, approaching concerning levels. 2

ACC/AHA guidelines recommend warning patients and arranging follow-up at 1 and 3 months post-procedure if fluoroscopy time exceeds 50 minutes on modern equipment or 30 minutes on older systems (>5 years), or if dose exceeds 4 Gy at the interventional reference point. 3

Factors Affecting Dose Variability

Radiation exposure varies considerably based on:

  • Occlusion location: Posterior circulation and carotid occlusions produce highest doses 2
  • Fluoroscopy time: Range of 5.7-137.3 minutes (mean 39.5 minutes) in clinical practice 2
  • Equipment age and technology: RDS reduces exposure by 35-53% 1
  • Patient characteristics: Obesity increases dose requirements 3
  • Operator technique: Beam collimation, positioning, and minimizing beam-on time are critical 3

Operator Exposure

For the interventionalist, typical operator exposure is approximately 0.1 mSv per Gy·cm² of patient KAP, meaning a 100 Gy·cm² thrombectomy delivers roughly 10 mSv to the operator—about 1/2,000th of patient exposure. 3 An active neurointerventionalist performing 500 procedures annually may receive up to 10 mSv/year occupational dose. 3

Critical Dose Reduction Strategies

The ACC/AHA emphasizes three fundamental ALARA principles: 3

  1. Minimize beam-on time: Use fluoroscopy only when actively viewing; utilize last-image-hold feature 3
  2. Optimize beam collimation: Actively collimate to minimum necessary field size 3
  3. Optimize geometry: Minimize patient-to-detector distance; maximize source-to-patient distance 3

Modern biplane systems with radiation dose-reduction technology should be considered standard of care, as they reduce exposure by one-third to one-half without compromising procedural success or safety. 1

References

Research

Investigation of Radiation Exposure of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke during Mechanical Thrombectomy.

RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin, 2019

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Radiation Exposure Guidelines for Medical Imaging

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.