Liver Transplantation Indications in Adults
Liver transplantation should be considered for adults with end-stage liver disease from hepatitis C or alcoholic liver disease when they develop life-threatening complications (ascites, variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome) or reach a MELD score ≥15, as this threshold indicates transplant benefit exceeds waitlist mortality risk. 1
Primary Disease Categories Warranting Transplantation
Chronic Liver Disease Indications
- Chronic hepatitis C with decompensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class C or MELD-Na ≥21) requires referral for transplantation 1
- Alcoholic liver disease with decompensation is an established indication, with transplantation in selected patients improving outcomes 2
- Other chronic noncholestatic disorders including chronic hepatitis B and autoimmune hepatitis are established indications 1
MELD Score-Based Prioritization
The allocation system operates algorithmically based on disease severity:
- MELD ≥15: List for transplantation, as benefit exceeds waitlist mortality 1
- MELD 15-29: Standard priority with regional allocation 1
- MELD >30: Urgent priority with macro-area level allocation 1
Referral should occur before development of malnutrition, hepatorenal failure, and advanced disease severity to optimize outcomes 1
Disease-Specific Considerations
Hepatitis C
- End-stage liver disease from hepatitis C with any hepatic decompensation warrants transplant evaluation 1
- Early referral at first decompensation event facilitates optimal timing 1
Alcoholic Liver Disease
The critical algorithmic approach for ALD:
Assess disease severity: Decompensated cirrhosis with Child-Pugh class C or MELD-Na ≥21 requires referral 1
Abstinence evaluation: A 6-month period of supervised community abstinence is desirable but not mandatory 2, 1
Multidisciplinary assessment requirements:
Special circumstances: Young patients on first medical presentation with life-threatening illness may not need stringent evaluation 2
Common pitfall: The strict 6-month rule may unfairly penalize low-risk patients unlikely to survive the waiting period 3. Active alcohol use is a relative contraindication, not absolute 2, 3.
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Complicating Cirrhosis
- Small HCC meeting Milan criteria (single tumor ≤5 cm or ≤3 tumors each ≤3 cm) should receive transplantation, providing 75% 4-year survival with 83% recurrence-free survival 2, 1
- Tumors >5 cm or >3 in number should only be assessed with novel management strategies 2
- Extrahepatic HCC is an absolute contraindication 2, 1
Acute Liver Failure
- All patients with non-paracetamol acute/subacute liver failure with encephalopathy (including fulminant Wilson's disease) must be referred to a transplant center 2, 1
- Paracetamol hepatotoxicity meeting specific criteria requires specialist referral 2, 1
- Progressive coagulopathy without encephalopathy warrants discussion with transplant center 2
Absolute Contraindications (Preclude Transplantation)
The following conditions make transplantation impossible:
- AIDS 2, 1
- Extrahepatic malignancy (except neuroendocrine tumors and hemangioendothelioma in some centers) 2, 1
- Advanced cardiopulmonary disease 2, 1
- Cholangiocarcinoma (unless experimental protocol) 2, 1
- Limited life expectancy from non-liver-related comorbidities 1
Relative Contraindications (Weigh Against but Not Absolute)
- HIV positivity 2, 1
- Age above 70 years 2, 1
- Significant sepsis outside biliary tree 2, 1
- Active alcohol/substance misuse (emphasis on "active") 2, 1, 3
- Severe psychiatric disorder 2, 1
- Portal venous system thrombosis (requires transplant center assessment) 2, 1
- Pulmonary hypertension (requires transplant center assessment) 2, 1
Mandatory Evaluation Components
Before listing, patients must undergo:
- Multidisciplinary assessment involving transplant hepatologist, transplant surgeon, and specialists 1
- Evaluation of comorbidities compromising post-transplant outcomes 1
- Assessment of ability to comply with complex medical regimens 1
- Exclusion of significant comorbid disease 2, 1
Critical timing consideration: The evaluation process itself takes time, so beginning evaluation does not mean immediate listing or transplantation 3