What is the treatment for an elderly patient with a 3-centimeter liver mass, showing increased arterial phase on computed tomography (CT) scan, and recurrent ascites (Ascitic Tap) in the emergency room (ER)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The most appropriate treatment for an elderly patient with a 3 cm liver mass showing increased arterial phase enhancement on CT and requiring recurrent ascitic taps in the emergency room is liver transplantation (Option A). This clinical picture strongly suggests hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with decompensated cirrhosis, as evidenced by the recurrent ascites requiring drainage. The arterial enhancement pattern on CT is characteristic of HCC, and the 3 cm size falls within transplant criteria 1. Liver transplantation addresses both the cancer and the underlying liver disease causing the ascites. Other options are less appropriate:

  • Lobar hepatectomy would be risky in a patient with decompensated cirrhosis;
  • Ablation (flugration) is typically reserved for smaller lesions in patients who cannot undergo transplantation;
  • Chemotherapy alone would not address the underlying liver dysfunction causing ascites. The patient would need evaluation for transplant eligibility, including assessment of comorbidities, cardiopulmonary status, and absence of extrahepatic disease, with bridge therapy such as transarterial chemoembolization potentially considered while awaiting transplantation 1. Key considerations in managing such a patient include the high risk of recurrence of HCC, particularly within the first year after treatment, and the importance of addressing the underlying liver disease to prevent further decompensation. Given the complexity of the case, a multidisciplinary approach involving hepatology, oncology, and transplant services is crucial for optimal management. The use of multiphase CT or MRI for surveillance after treatment for HCC is recommended, with the choice between these modalities depending on factors such as the patient's renal function and the presence of contraindications to certain contrast agents 1. Ultimately, the goal of treatment should be to improve the patient's quality of life, reduce morbidity, and prolong survival, with liver transplantation offering the potential for a cure for both the HCC and the underlying cirrhosis.

From the FDA Drug Label

The FDA drug label does not answer the question.

From the Research

Treatment Options for Elderly Patient with Liver Mass

  • The patient's condition involves a 3 cm liver mass with increased arterial phase in CT and recurrent ascetic tap in the ER.
  • Considering the patient's age and liver condition, the following treatment options are available:
    • Liver transplantation: According to 2, liver transplantation is an important therapeutic option for patients with life-limiting liver disease, including primary hepatic cancers.
    • Radiofrequency ablation (RFA): Studies such as 3 and 4 suggest that RFA can be safely utilized as a bridge to liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
    • Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE): 3 and 4 also mention TACE as a treatment option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplantation.
    • Lobe hepatectomy: 5 suggests that resection can be considered for multiple tumors within the Milan criteria, but it may come with a slightly increased risk of complication.

Comparison of Treatment Options

  • The studies do not provide a direct comparison of the treatment options for an elderly patient with a 3 cm liver mass.
  • However, 5 compares the outcomes of liver resection, RFA, and TACE for multiple small hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria, suggesting that resection may provide better long-term outcomes.
  • 4 finds no difference in waitlist mortality and dropout for transplant candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma who received TACE versus RFA.

Considerations for Treatment

  • The patient's age, comorbidity profile, and liver function should be taken into account when selecting a treatment option.
  • According to 2, patients over 65 years may be transplant candidates if they possess a favorable comorbidity profile.
  • The treatment options should be discussed with a healthcare provider to determine the best course of action for the patient.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.