Treatment of Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women
For a postmenopausal woman with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), treatment should follow the same evidence-based algorithms as invasive ductal carcinoma, prioritizing breast-conserving surgery with radiation therapy when feasible, followed by adjuvant endocrine therapy (aromatase inhibitors preferred over tamoxifen), with consideration of family history for genetic counseling and potential risk-reducing strategies. 1, 2
Surgical Management
Primary Tumor Treatment
- Breast-conserving surgery (lumpectomy) with whole-breast radiation is the preferred approach for early-stage ILC (stages I-II), achieving equivalent overall survival to mastectomy with local recurrence rates of only 3% 3
- Mastectomy is indicated when: tumor size >3-4 cm relative to breast size, multicentric disease, inability to achieve negative margins, or patient preference 1
- MRI imaging should be strongly considered before surgery specifically for lobular cancers due to their insidious, infiltrative growth pattern that can be underestimated on conventional mammography and ultrasound 1
Axillary Staging
- Sentinel lymph node biopsy is the standard of care for axillary staging unless nodes are clinically or radiographically suspicious 1
- Full axillary dissection is reserved only for documented macrometastatic disease in sentinel nodes 1
Margin Requirements
- Negative margins are mandatory; margins <2 mm are considered inadequate and require re-excision 1
- ILC's diffuse growth pattern makes achieving clear margins more challenging, necessitating careful intraoperative assessment 4, 5
Radiation Therapy
- Whole-breast radiation (4,500-5,000 cGy over 25 fractions) is strongly recommended after breast-conserving surgery, reducing local recurrence risk by two-thirds 1
- A boost to the tumor bed provides an additional 50% risk reduction and is generally indicated 1
- Post-mastectomy radiation is recommended for ≥4 positive nodes or T3 tumors 1
- Omission of radiation after lumpectomy significantly increases risk of early recurrence (<5 years) in ILC patients 6
Systemic Endocrine Therapy
Postmenopausal Standard Treatment
- Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are superior to tamoxifen as first-line adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive ILC 2
- Standard duration is 5 years, though extended therapy may be considered given ILC's propensity for late recurrences 2, 6, 4
- Most ILCs are estrogen receptor-positive (>90%), HER2-negative, and luminal A subtype, making them highly endocrine-responsive 7, 4, 5
Critical Treatment Principle
- Omission of adjuvant endocrine therapy dramatically increases risk of early recurrence in ILC patients 6
- Endocrine therapy should be initiated for all hormone receptor-positive tumors 2
Genetic Counseling and Family History Considerations
When to Refer for Genetic Assessment
- Postmenopausal diagnosis with family history of breast cancer warrants genetic counseling evaluation 1
- If BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations are identified, consider risk-reducing contralateral mastectomy, which reduces subsequent breast cancer risk by 90-95% 1
- Annual MRI screening of remaining breast tissue is recommended for proven BRCA carriers 1
Chemotherapy Considerations
- ILC tumors are typically low-to-intermediate grade, ER-positive, and HER2-negative, making them less chemotherapy-responsive than ductal carcinomas 4, 5
- Chemotherapy decisions should follow standard risk stratification: node-positive disease, large tumor size (>2 cm), high grade, or uncertain endocrine responsiveness 1
- Emerging data suggest ILC may have differential response to standard chemotherapy regimens compared to ductal carcinoma, though treatment algorithms remain the same 4
Exercise and Lifestyle Interventions
- Recommend 7.5-15 MET-hours per week of moderate-to-vigorous aerobic exercise combined with resistance training to reduce recurrence risk by 24% and breast cancer-specific mortality by 34% 7
- This translates to approximately 150 minutes weekly of brisk walking, cycling, or swimming 7
- ILC does not require different exercise recommendations than other breast cancers, as most have luminal A phenotype and respond similarly to lifestyle interventions 7
Surveillance Strategy
Early Follow-Up (Years 1-5)
- Clinical examination every 3-4 months for first 2 years, then every 6 months for years 3-5 1
- Annual mammography with ultrasound of ipsilateral (if breast-conserving) and contralateral breast 1
- Consider MRI for young patients, dense breasts, or familial predisposition 1
Late Follow-Up (Beyond 5 Years)
- Annual clinical examinations indefinitely 1
- Maintain heightened vigilance for late recurrences (>5 years), which are characteristic of ILC, particularly in younger patients and those with elevated BMI 6, 4
- Late recurrences are associated with patient factors (younger age at diagnosis, BMI >25) rather than tumor aggressiveness 6
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not underestimate tumor extent on conventional imaging—ILC's single-file infiltrative pattern makes it notoriously difficult to assess true disease burden without MRI 1, 4, 5
- Do not omit radiation therapy after lumpectomy—this significantly increases early recurrence risk in ILC 6
- Do not omit endocrine therapy—this is the most critical systemic treatment for hormone receptor-positive ILC 6
- Do not use tamoxifen as first-line in postmenopausal women—aromatase inhibitors are superior 2
- Do not perform routine staging tests (bone scan, CT, liver function) in asymptomatic early-stage disease 8
- Be aware of atypical metastatic patterns—ILC has propensity for unusual metastatic sites (peritoneum, retroperitoneum, GI tract, gynecologic organs) compared to ductal carcinoma 4, 5
Special Consideration: Lobular Carcinoma In Situ (LCIS)
If LCIS is found in association with invasive ILC:
- LCIS increases ipsilateral breast recurrence risk, particularly in patients <50 years, T1 tumors, and those not receiving systemic therapy 9
- Tamoxifen or raloxifene for 5 years reduces invasive cancer risk by 46% in postmenopausal women with LCIS 1
- LCIS in surgical margins warrants consideration of wider excision or more aggressive systemic risk reduction 1, 9