Is fluticasone propionate (FP) 110 similar to Pulmicort (budesonide)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 23, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Fluticasone Propionate 110 mcg vs Pulmicort (Budesonide): Comparison

Fluticasone propionate 110 mcg is approximately equivalent to budesonide 200-220 mcg based on established dosing guidelines, making them similar but not identical in potency—fluticasone is roughly 1.5-2 times more potent per microgram than budesonide. 1

Dose Equivalency Based on Guidelines

The EPR-3 asthma guidelines provide clear dose equivalency tables that establish the relationship between these medications 1:

For adults:

  • Fluticasone propionate (HFA/MDI) 110 mcg/puff: Low daily dose is 88-264 mcg
  • Budesonide (DPI) 90,180, or 200 mcg/inhalation: Low daily dose is 180-600 mcg

This translates to fluticasone 110 mcg being roughly comparable to budesonide 180-220 mcg in clinical practice 1.

For children (5-11 years):

  • Fluticasone 88-176 mcg daily (low dose) corresponds to budesonide 180-400 mcg daily (low dose) 1

Potency Ratio Evidence

Clinical Trial Data

The DICE study established a rank order of systemic potency based on HPA axis suppression, showing that fluticasone propionate delivered by DPI had a potency ratio of 2.08:1 compared to reference, while budesonide DPI was 3.45:1 1. This suggests fluticasone has greater systemic effects at equivalent labeled doses.

Direct comparison research demonstrates:

  • The potency ratio of fluticasone propionate (Flixotide Diskus) to budesonide (Pulmicort Turbuhaler) is 1.50:1 to 1.75:1 (95% CI 1.10:1-2.43:1) 2
  • This potency difference is most evident at low daily doses below 200 mcg 2

Efficacy Comparisons

Multiple Cochrane meta-analyses comparing fluticasone to budesonide at a 1:2 dose ratio (half the dose of fluticasone) found 3, 4, 5:

  • FEV1 improvement: Fluticasone at half the dose produced significantly greater improvements (0.11-0.14 liters, 95% CI 0.01-0.22 liters) 3, 4
  • Morning PEF: Fluticasone showed 11-13 L/min greater improvement (95% CI 3-22 L/min) 3, 4, 5
  • Evening PEF: Fluticasone demonstrated 9-11 L/min greater improvement (95% CI 1-20 L/min) 3, 4, 5

A pooled meta-analysis of 1,980 patients confirmed fluticasone at half the microgram dose was more effective than budesonide, with an overall PEFR difference of +11 L/min 6.

Safety Profile Differences

Systemic effects at equivalent doses:

  • When fluticasone is given at half the dose of budesonide, there is greater likelihood of pharyngitis (Peto OR 2.16,95% CI 1.43-3.24) 3, 4
  • No significant difference in oral candidiasis rates between the two medications 3, 4, 5
  • At low doses, no differences in serum cortisol suppression, but at higher doses, fluticasone shows less cortisol suppression than budesonide 6

Clinical Application

For practical prescribing:

  • Fluticasone propionate 110 mcg twice daily (220 mcg/day total) is clinically similar to budesonide 200 mcg twice daily (400 mcg/day total) 1
  • The preparations are not interchangeable on a mcg-per-puff basis and require dose adjustment when switching 1
  • Both medications require proper inhaler technique and consideration of delivery device characteristics 1

Important caveats:

  • Both fluticasone and budesonide are metabolized by CYP3A4 enzymes, requiring caution with potent inhibitors like ritonavir or ketoconazole 1
  • Local side effects (cough, dysphonia, oral thrush) can be minimized with spacer devices and mouth rinsing after use 1
  • The clinician must monitor patient response and titrate to the minimum effective dose once control is achieved 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.