What are the next steps in evaluating a patient with hematuria (presence of red blood cells (RBC) in urine) and squamous cells in a clean catch urine sample?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 25, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Squamous Cells in Clean Catch Urine: Clinical Significance and Next Steps

Squamous cells in a clean catch urine specimen do not indicate contamination and should not delay or prevent appropriate evaluation of hematuria. The presence of RBCs requires confirmation with microscopic urinalysis and subsequent risk-stratified workup regardless of squamous cell presence.

Understanding Squamous Cells in Urine

  • Squamous cells are present in 94-96% of both catheterized and clean catch urine samples from women and do not predict bacterial contamination 1
  • The overall predictive value of squamous cells for bacterial contamination is only 21% in midstream clean catch samples 1
  • Squamous cells are normally shed from the urethra, trigone area of the bladder, or cervicovaginal region in women 2
  • Laboratory personnel may incorrectly report renal tubular epithelial cells as squamous cells, which can lead to misinterpretation 3

Confirming True Hematuria

Before initiating any workup, confirm true microscopic hematuria with ≥3 RBCs per high-power field on microscopic examination of at least two of three properly collected clean-catch midstream urine specimens 4, 5. This is critical because:

  • Dipstick testing has limited specificity (65-99%) and requires microscopic confirmation 4, 5
  • The presence of both RBCs and blood on dipstick suggests true hematuria, not a false-positive result 6
  • Do not proceed with extensive urologic workup based solely on dipstick results 5

Risk Stratification for Confirmed Hematuria

Once microscopic hematuria is confirmed (≥3 RBCs/HPF on 2 of 3 specimens), stratify patients into risk categories 5:

High-Risk Features (Require Full Urologic Evaluation)

  • Age ≥60 years (men) or ≥60 years (women) 5
  • Smoking history >30 pack-years 5, 7
  • 25 RBCs per high-power field 5

  • Any history of gross hematuria 5, 7
  • Occupational exposure to chemicals/dyes (benzenes, aromatic amines) 4, 7
  • Irritative voiding symptoms without infection 5, 7

Intermediate-Risk Features

  • Women age 50-59 years or men age 40-59 years 5
  • Smoking history 10-30 pack-years 5
  • 11-25 RBCs per high-power field 5

Low-Risk Features

  • Women age <50 years or men age <40 years 5
  • Never smoker or <10 pack-years 5
  • 3-10 RBCs per high-power field 5

Distinguishing Glomerular from Non-Glomerular Sources

Examine urinary sediment for features suggesting glomerular disease 5, 7:

Glomerular Indicators (Require Nephrology Referral)

  • 80% dysmorphic RBCs 5, 6

  • Red blood cell casts (pathognomonic for glomerular disease) 5, 6
  • Significant proteinuria (>500 mg/24 hours or protein-to-creatinine ratio >0.5) 5, 6
  • Tea-colored or cola-colored urine 5
  • Elevated serum creatinine or declining renal function 5, 6

Non-Glomerular Indicators (Proceed with Urologic Evaluation)

  • <20% dysmorphic RBCs 6
  • Absence of red cell casts 6
  • Minimal or no proteinuria 6
  • Bright red blood 6

Complete Urologic Evaluation for Non-Glomerular Hematuria

Upper Tract Imaging

Multiphasic CT urography is the preferred imaging modality 5, 7, 6, including:

  • Unenhanced phase (to detect stones) 6
  • Nephrographic phase (to detect renal masses) 6
  • Excretory phase (to evaluate collecting systems, ureters, bladder) 6

Lower Tract Evaluation

Cystoscopy is mandatory for 5, 6:

  • All patients ≥40 years old with confirmed microscopic hematuria 6
  • Younger patients with risk factors (smoking, occupational exposure, irritative symptoms, history of gross hematuria) 6
  • Flexible cystoscopy is preferred over rigid cystoscopy as it causes less pain with equivalent or superior diagnostic accuracy 5

Laboratory Testing

  • Serum creatinine to assess renal function 5, 7
  • Complete urinalysis with microscopy 5
  • Urine culture if infection suspected (preferably before antibiotics) 5, 7
  • Voided urine cytology in high-risk patients 5, 7

Special Considerations

If Urinary Tract Infection is Suspected

  • Obtain urine culture before initiating antibiotics 7
  • Treat appropriately and repeat urinalysis 6 weeks after treatment completion to confirm resolution of hematuria 7
  • If hematuria persists after documented UTI treatment, proceed with risk-stratified evaluation 7

If Glomerular Disease is Suspected

Refer to nephrology in addition to completing urologic evaluation 5, 6 if:

  • Dysmorphic RBCs >80% with or without red cell casts 6
  • Proteinuria >500 mg/24 hours 6
  • Elevated serum creatinine or declining renal function 6
  • Hypertension accompanying hematuria and proteinuria 6

Follow-Up Protocol for Negative Initial Evaluation

If complete urologic workup is negative but hematuria persists 5, 6:

  • Repeat urinalysis at 6,12,24, and 36 months 5, 6
  • Monitor blood pressure at each visit 5, 6
  • Consider repeat complete evaluation within 3-5 years for persistent hematuria in high-risk patients 6

Immediate Re-Evaluation is Warranted If:

  • Gross hematuria develops 5, 6
  • Significant increase in degree of microscopic hematuria 5, 6
  • New urologic symptoms appear 5, 6
  • Development of hypertension, proteinuria, or evidence of glomerular bleeding 5, 6

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never dismiss hematuria because squamous cells are present—squamous cells do not indicate contamination 1
  • Never defer evaluation due to anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy—these medications may unmask underlying pathology but do not cause hematuria 5, 6
  • Never ignore gross hematuria, even if self-limited—it carries a 30-40% malignancy risk and mandates urgent urologic referral 5, 6
  • Never rely solely on dipstick testing—confirm with microscopic urinalysis showing ≥3 RBCs/HPF before initiating workup 4, 5
  • Never attribute hematuria to a "convenient explanation" like crystals or medication without completing appropriate evaluation 6

References

Research

Comparison and interpretation of urinalysis performed by a nephrologist versus a hospital-based clinical laboratory.

American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2005

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Hematuria Evaluation and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Evaluation and Management of Hematuria

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Management of Hematuria in the Outpatient Setting

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.