What is the likelihood that a patient with a history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 (CIN 3) and recent development of hematuria with epithelial squamous cells in urine, post-loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), actually has cervical cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 25, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Likelihood of Invasive Cervical Cancer in CIN 3 with Hematuria and Squamous Cells in Urine

The presence of hematuria with red blood cells and squamous epithelial cells in urine following LEEP for CIN 3 is highly concerning for bladder mucosal infiltration by invasive cervical cancer and requires immediate cystoscopy, as this finding has 100% sensitivity for detecting bladder involvement and would upstage the disease to at least stage IVA cervical cancer. 1, 2

Understanding the Clinical Context

The critical distinction here is whether you are dealing with true CIN 3 (preinvasive disease) versus occult invasive cervical cancer that was incompletely evaluated or treated:

  • True CIN 3 is by definition non-invasive and should not cause bladder symptoms or hematuria 1
  • Only about 1% of properly treated CIN 3 progresses to invasive cancer 3
  • Untreated CIN 3 has a 30% probability of becoming invasive cancer over 30 years, with 50.3% progression risk in those with persistent disease within 24 months 3, 4

Immediate Diagnostic Algorithm

Step 1: Urgent Cystoscopy with Biopsy

  • Hematuria in cervical cancer patients has 100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value for detecting bladder mucosal infiltration 2
  • The specificity is 60.3%, meaning some false positives occur, but no cases of bladder involvement are missed when hematuria is present 2
  • Cystoscopy with biopsy is the gold standard and must be performed immediately 1, 2

Step 2: Histologic Confirmation

  • If cystoscopy reveals bladder mucosal infiltration confirmed by biopsy showing metastatic squamous cell carcinoma, this represents stage IVA cervical cancer, not CIN 3 1
  • This fundamentally changes management from excisional procedures to definitive chemoradiation 1
  • The original diagnosis should be reconsidered—true CIN 3 does not invade the bladder 1

Critical Pitfalls in This Clinical Scenario

The LEEP procedure may have been inadequate for diagnosis:

  • When CIN 3 is diagnosed on colposcopically-directed biopsy, 23-55% of subsequent LEEP specimens reveal CIN 2 or CIN 3 that was more extensive than initially appreciated 3
  • More importantly, up to 7% of women with biopsy-confirmed CIN 2/3 and unsatisfactory colposcopy have occult invasive cancer on diagnostic conization 3
  • Hematuria with squamous cells suggests the original lesion may have been microinvasive or frankly invasive cancer that was incompletely sampled 1

Histologic features that distinguish invasion from CIN 3:

  • Giant bizarre cells (present in 66.7% of invasive cancer vs. 6.3% of CIN 3) 5
  • Large keratinized cells (87% of invasive cancer vs. 0% of CIN 3) 5
  • Keratin pearls (40.6% of invasive cancer vs. 0% of CIN 3) 5
  • Necrosis (79.7% of invasive cancer vs. 8.3% of CIN 3) 5
  • The original pathology should be re-reviewed for these features 5

Management Based on Cystoscopy Results

If bladder involvement is confirmed:

  • Immediate referral to gynecologic oncology for stage IVA cervical cancer management 1
  • Treatment with definitive chemoradiation, not excisional procedures 1
  • Excisional treatment (LEEP, conization) is contraindicated once invasion is confirmed 1

If bladder involvement is ruled out:

  • Proceed with diagnostic excisional procedure (cold-knife conization or repeat LEEP) to definitively exclude occult invasion in the cervix itself 1
  • The hematuria may be from the LEEP procedure itself or unrelated urologic pathology 2
  • Follow-up with cervical cytology at 4-6 month intervals until 3 consecutive negative results, then annual cytology 1
  • HPV DNA testing at 6-12 months post-treatment is an alternative; if negative, proceed to annual cytology 1

Risk Stratification Post-LEEP

If the patient tests positive for carcinogenic HPV after LEEP:

  • Women positive for HPV16 have a 37.0% 2-year risk of recurrent CIN 2+, significantly higher than other carcinogenic types (10.8%) 6
  • Women who test HPV-negative after LEEP have 0% risk of subsequent CIN 2+ 6
  • HPV testing post-LEEP has 96.9% sensitivity for detecting recurrent disease, superior to cytology alone (78.1%) 6

Bottom Line

The presence of hematuria with RBCs and squamous cells in urine is not consistent with properly treated CIN 3 and strongly suggests either bladder infiltration by invasive cervical cancer or inadequate initial evaluation that missed invasion. Cystoscopy cannot be delayed, as this finding has never been associated with a false negative for bladder involvement in the literature 2. If cystoscopy is negative, the cervix itself must be re-evaluated with diagnostic excision to rule out occult invasion that was missed on the initial LEEP 1.

References

Guideline

Invasive Cervical Cancer Diagnosis and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Hematuria screening test for urinary bladder mucosal infiltration in cervical cancer.

Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2012

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Human papillomavirus testing following loop electrosurgical excision procedure identifies women at risk for posttreatment cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 disease.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2006

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.