CA-125 Clinical Significance and Interpretation
CA-125 is a tumor marker most useful for monitoring treatment response and detecting recurrence in established epithelial ovarian cancer, but has limited value as a screening or diagnostic tool due to poor specificity—it is elevated in numerous benign conditions including endometriosis, menstruation, heart failure, liver disease with ascites, and pelvic inflammatory disease. 1, 2, 3
Primary Clinical Applications
Established Ovarian Cancer Management
- CA-125 should be used to monitor disease response to treatment and detect recurrence in patients with confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer, particularly high-grade serous carcinoma where it is most reliable 1, 4
- Measure CA-125 before each chemotherapy cycle and at each follow-up visit if initially elevated 4
- Serial measurements require two elevated values at least one week apart to confirm progression 4
- Rising CA-125 in asymptomatic patients typically precedes clinical relapse by 2-6 months 4
- CA-125 criteria for response and progression (GCIG criteria) have utility in routine practice but must be combined with radiological and clinical assessment—never use CA-125 alone for treatment decisions 1
Limitations by Histologic Subtype
- CA-125 is elevated in approximately 85% of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer but only 50% of early-stage disease 4, 5
- CA-125 is NOT a reliable marker in non-high-grade serous ovarian cancers, particularly mucinous carcinoma, clear cell, endometrioid, and low-grade serous types 1
- For mucinous tumors, measure CEA and CA 19-9 in addition to CA-125; a CA-125/CEA ratio >25 favors ovarian over gastrointestinal origin 4
Targeted Therapy Monitoring
- The role of CA-125 in assessing response to targeted therapies (including bevacizumab and PARP inhibitors) is not proven; use radiological and clinical assessment instead 1
Benign Conditions Causing CA-125 Elevation
Gynecologic Conditions
- In premenopausal women with clinical features of endometriosis, elevated CA-125 should NOT raise unnecessary concern for malignancy 2
- Menstruation elevates CA-125, with highest levels during menses (upper limit 62 U/mL) versus luteal phase (upper limit 32 U/mL) 6
- Pelvic inflammatory disease, adenomyosis, benign ovarian cysts, and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome all elevate CA-125 2, 3, 7
- Pregnancy and oral contraceptive use (5-10 years) are associated with lower CA-125 levels 8
Non-Gynecologic Conditions
- Cirrhosis with ascites universally elevates CA-125 because mesothelial cells under pressure from fluid produce the antigen—do not test CA-125 in patients with ascites of any cause as it is nonspecific 3, 4, 7
- Heart failure elevates CA-125 due to serous epithelial cell response to mechanical and inflammatory stimuli 9
- Coronary artery disease in postmenopausal women is associated with 28% higher CA-125 levels 8
- Peritonitis, pleural effusion, and previous radiotherapy can elevate CA-125 3, 4, 7
Marked Elevations in Benign Disease
- CA-125 levels >1000 U/mL and even up to 5000 U/mL can occur in benign conditions, limiting its diagnostic value 7
- No CA-125 concentration can be clearly diagnostic of malignancy 7
Screening and Risk Assessment
General Population
- Routine CA-125 screening is NOT recommended for the general population—randomized data do not support this approach 1
- CA-125 alone has insufficient sensitivity (only 50% of stage I ovarian cancers have elevated levels) and specificity for screening 1, 4
- Multimodality screening trials (UKCTOCS) showed some promise, but definitive mortality benefit data are still pending 1
High-Risk Populations
- For women with BRCA mutations or strong family history, some clinicians monitor with CA-125 and transvaginal ultrasound, though prospective validation remains elusive 1
- The ROCA algorithm (using age and longitudinal CA-125 changes) may have utility in high-risk women but is not validated for average-risk screening 1
Postmenopausal Women
- For postmenopausal women with elevated CA-125 and pelvic mass, immediate referral to a gynecologic oncologist is warranted 4
- Upper limit of normal CA-125 in postmenopausal women is 20 U/mL without vaginal bleeding and 35 U/mL with bleeding 6
- A normal CA-125 may provide false reassurance in postmenopausal women with intermediate- or high-risk ovarian lesions on imaging 2
Diagnostic Workup Algorithm
When CA-125 is Elevated
- Obtain transvaginal ultrasound with color Doppler as first-line imaging to evaluate for ovarian masses 4
- Apply O-RADS risk stratification: O-RADS 2 (<1% malignancy risk), O-RADS 3 (1-10%), O-RADS 4 (10-50%), O-RADS 5 (≥50%) 4
- Look for concerning ultrasound features: solid components, papillary projections, thick septations, ascites, complex masses 4
- If mass is present, follow up with CT chest/abdomen/pelvis, MRI, or PET-CT as clinically indicated 4
- Consider measuring CEA and CA 19-9 if mucinous tumor or gastrointestinal metastasis is suspected 4
Menopausal Status Matters
- Premenopausal: Upper limit 50 U/mL overall (62 U/mL during menses, 32 U/mL luteal phase) 6
- Postmenopausal: Upper limit 20 U/mL without bleeding, 35 U/mL with bleeding 6
- Mean CA-125 is significantly higher in premenopausal (19.3 U/mL) versus postmenopausal women (11.7 U/mL) 6
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never use CA-125 alone to make surgical decisions or diagnose ovarian cancer 1, 4
- Do not test CA-125 in patients with ascites—it will be universally elevated regardless of cause 3, 4
- Do not assume elevated CA-125 indicates malignancy in premenopausal women with endometriosis symptoms 2
- Do not rely on CA-125 for early ovarian cancer detection—it misses 50% of stage I disease 4
- Remember that current smoking and longer-duration OCP use are associated with lower CA-125 in premenopausal women 8
- In patients with diabetes and chronic disease, consider heart failure and inflammatory conditions as alternative explanations for CA-125 elevation 9, 8
Alternative and Complementary Markers
- HE4 combined with CA-125 improves sensitivity and specificity for epithelial ovarian cancer 5
- ROMA and OVA1 algorithms are FDA-approved for evaluating ovarian cancer risk in patients with pelvic masses 5
- Ultrasound-based models (IOTA Simple Rules, IOTA ADNEX) are superior to CA-125 alone for distinguishing benign from malignant ovarian tumors 4
- The OVA1 test should NOT be used as a screening tool per SGO and FDA guidance 1