IVF Efficacy in a 34-Year-Old Woman with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
IVF with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) significantly improves live birth rates in women with recurrent pregnancy loss, with adjusted odds ratios of 1.31-1.45 for women aged 34-37 years compared to IVF without PGT-A. 1
Evidence for IVF with PGT-A in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
The most robust evidence comes from a large SART-CORS database study analyzing 12,631 frozen embryo transfer cycles in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (defined as ≥3 losses). 1 For women in the 35-37 age bracket (which includes your 34-year-old patient), IVF-FET with PGT-A demonstrated an adjusted odds ratio of 1.45 (95% CI: 1.21-1.75) for live birth compared to IVF without PGT-A. 1
Key Outcome Data by Age Group
- For ages <35 years: Live birth OR 1.31 (95% CI: 1.12-1.52) with PGT-A versus without 1
- For ages 35-37 years: Live birth OR 1.45 (95% CI: 1.21-1.75) with PGT-A versus without 1
- Clinical pregnancy rates showed similar improvements, with OR 1.26 for age <35 and 1.37 for ages 35-37 1
Mechanism of Benefit
Chromosomal abnormalities are significantly elevated in preimplantation embryos from women with recurrent miscarriage, particularly affecting chromosome 13. 2 This explains why PGT-A provides substantial benefit—it allows selection of euploid embryos, thereby reducing the baseline miscarriage rate to 14-16% across all maternal ages. 3
A prospective study demonstrated that PGT-A reduced spontaneous abortion rates from an expected 35.9% to 12.8% in patients with more than two previous losses. 3 The benefit was consistent regardless of fertility status, with fertile patients achieving 37% delivery rates and infertile patients achieving 34% delivery rates. 3
Underlying Causes to Consider
Before proceeding with IVF, comprehensive evaluation should identify treatable causes:
- Genetic factors: 29% of recurrent miscarriage cases show genetic causes 4
- Thrombophilic factors: 21% isolated, 24% combined with immune factors 4
- Immune factors: 14% isolated 4
- Idiopathic: Only 12% of cases remain unexplained after thorough workup 4
Important caveat: Even with PGT-A selecting euploid embryos, this addresses only the 29% of cases due to genetic factors. 4 The remaining 71% of cases require evaluation for immune, thrombophilic, endocrine, and anatomical factors. 5, 6
Recommended Evaluation Prior to IVF
Your 34-year-old patient should undergo:
- Parental karyotyping (both partners) 6
- Antiphospholipid antibody testing (lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, anti-β2 glycoprotein I) 5
- Thrombophilia screening if family history of VTE (Factor V Leiden, Prothrombin G20210A) 6
- Uterine cavity assessment via transvaginal ultrasound and sonohysterography 5
- Thyroid function testing (TSH, free T4) 5
- Assessment for PCOS and ovarian reserve (AMH, antral follicle count) 5, 6
- Male partner evaluation including karyotype and consideration of sperm DNA fragmentation testing 6
Clinical Algorithm
For a 34-year-old woman with recurrent pregnancy loss:
Complete diagnostic workup as outlined above to identify treatable causes 5, 6
If genetic mutations in NLRP7 or KHDC3L genes are identified (recurrent molar pregnancies), consider ovum donation rather than conventional IVF 5, 6
For idiopathic or chromosomal causes: Proceed with IVF-FET with PGT-A 1
If thrombophilia identified: Women with homozygous Factor V Leiden or Prothrombin G20210A with positive family history for VTE should receive prophylactic or intermediate-dose LMWH during pregnancy 6
Optimize modifiable factors: Thyroid function, glycemic control, avoid smoking/alcohol, maintain healthy BMI 5, 6
Expected Outcomes
Based on the highest quality evidence, a 34-year-old woman with recurrent pregnancy loss undergoing IVF with PGT-A can expect:
- Clinical pregnancy rate improvement of 26-37% compared to IVF without PGT-A 1
- Live birth rate improvement of 31-45% compared to IVF without PGT-A 1
- Reduction in spontaneous abortion rate from expected 34-36% to approximately 14% 3
- Overall delivery rate of approximately 34-37% per transfer cycle 3
Critical Pitfall to Avoid
Do not assume IVF with PGT-A alone will solve all recurrent pregnancy loss. While it addresses chromosomal abnormalities (29% of cases), it does not address immune, thrombophilic, anatomical, or endocrine causes that account for the majority of cases. 4 A comprehensive workup and treatment of identified factors is essential for optimal outcomes. 5, 6