What are the HRS (Hepatorenal Syndrome) criteria for diagnosing hepatorenal syndrome in patients with advanced liver disease, likely with a history of cirrhosis and potential comorbidities such as portal hypertension?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 29, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

HRS Diagnostic Criteria

The diagnosis of hepatorenal syndrome requires serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL (133 μmol/L) in a patient with advanced liver disease and ascites, after excluding shock, hypovolemia, nephrotoxic drugs, and parenchymal renal disease. 1

Essential Diagnostic Criteria

All of the following must be present to diagnose HRS 1:

  • Serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL (133 μmol/L) 1

  • Absence of shock 1

  • Absence of hypovolemia, defined as no sustained improvement in renal function (creatinine failing to decrease to <133 μmol/L) following at least 2 days of diuretic withdrawal (if on diuretics) AND volume expansion with albumin at 1 g/kg/day up to a maximum of 100 g/day 1

  • No current or recent treatment with nephrotoxic drugs 1

  • Absence of parenchymal renal disease, defined by:

    • Proteinuria <0.5 g/day 1
    • No microhematuria (<50 red blood cells/high powered field) 1
    • Normal renal ultrasonography 1

HRS Classification

Type 1 HRS (HRS-AKI) is characterized by rapid and progressive impairment in renal function with an increase in serum creatinine ≥100% compared to baseline to a level >2.5 mg/dL in less than 2 weeks 1, 2

Type 2 HRS shows stable or less progressive impairment in renal function and is commonly associated with refractory ascites 1

Clinical Context

HRS occurs in patients with advanced liver disease, most commonly cirrhosis with portal hypertension and ascites 1. The diagnosis is essentially one of exclusion of other causes of renal failure 1. The condition represents functional renal failure without structural kidney damage, as evidenced by histologically normal kidneys on postmortem examination 3.

Key Diagnostic Pitfalls

The distinction between HRS-AKI and acute tubular necrosis remains challenging with currently available clinical tools, yet this distinction has direct management implications since treatment differs between these conditions 4. The albumin challenge (1 g/kg/day for 2 days) is critical to exclude volume-responsive AKI before diagnosing HRS 1. Failure to withdraw diuretics and adequately volume expand before making the diagnosis is a common error that can lead to misclassification of prerenal azotemia as HRS 1.

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.