What is the appropriate treatment and dosage of cefixime (cephalosporin antibiotic) for a child with a bacterial respiratory infection?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 29, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Cefixime for Respiratory Infections in Children

Critical Limitation: Cefixime is NOT Recommended for Most Pediatric Respiratory Infections

Cefixime should NOT be used as first-line therapy for bacterial respiratory infections in children because it has inadequate activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae, the most common bacterial respiratory pathogen, and has no clinically significant activity against drug-resistant S. pneumoniae (DRSP). 1

Why Cefixime Fails for Respiratory Infections

Inadequate Pneumococcal Coverage

  • The American Academy of Otolaryngology explicitly states that cefixime has limited gram-positive coverage including S. pneumoniae, may occasionally fail against even penicillin-susceptible pneumococci, and has no activity against DRSP 1
  • The Infectious Diseases Society of America specifically excludes cefixime from recommended alternatives for acute bacterial sinusitis, stating that third-generation cephalosporins like cefpodoxime-proxetil and cefotiam-hexetil are acceptable, but NOT cefixime 2
  • Cefixime's predicted clinical efficacy in children with acute bacterial rhinosinusitis is only 82-87% (based on H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis coverage only), which is significantly lower than high-dose amoxicillin-clavulanate at 91-92% 1

When Cefixime Has Limited Role

  • Cefixime has potent activity against H. influenzae but this narrow spectrum makes it unsuitable as monotherapy for respiratory infections where S. pneumoniae is the primary concern 1
  • It may only be considered as part of combination therapy (e.g., high-dose amoxicillin or clindamycin plus cefixime) for moderate disease or treatment failures, but this approach lacks robust clinical trial evidence 1

Recommended First-Line Therapy Instead

For Mild Respiratory Infections in Children

  • High-dose amoxicillin (90 mg/kg/day) is the preferred first-line agent for children who have not received antibiotics in the previous 4-6 weeks 1
  • High-dose amoxicillin-clavulanate (90 mg/6.4 mg per kg per day) for children with recent antibiotic exposure or moderate disease 1
  • Alternative second-generation/third-generation cephalosporins with adequate pneumococcal coverage: cefpodoxime proxetil, cefuroxime axetil, or cefdinir 1

For Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Children

  • The Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society recommends ampicillin or penicillin G for hospitalized children who are fully immunized 1
  • For outpatient pneumonia in children under 5 years: high-dose amoxicillin (90 mg/kg/day) 1
  • Cefixime is not mentioned in the PIDS/IDSA pneumonia guidelines as an appropriate option 1

FDA-Approved Indications for Cefixime

What Cefixime IS Approved For

While cefixime is FDA-approved for certain respiratory conditions, this does not mean it is the optimal choice:

  • Pharyngitis and tonsillitis caused by Streptococcus pyogenes (though penicillin remains the drug of choice) 3
  • Acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis caused by S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae 3
  • Otitis media (though the suspension formulation is required, not tablets/capsules) 3

Dosing IF Cefixime is Used (Despite Limitations)

  • Pediatric dose: 8 mg/kg/day as a single daily dose or divided into 4 mg/kg every 12 hours 3
  • Maximum daily dose: 400 mg 3
  • Duration: At least 10 days for S. pyogenes infections 3
  • Must use suspension formulation for otitis media due to superior pharmacokinetics 3

Clinical Evidence Shows Limited Efficacy

Research Findings

  • A 1995 post-marketing surveillance study showed 98% cure/improvement rates in children with respiratory infections, but this study lacked bacteriologic confirmation and included many viral infections 4
  • A 1998 multinational study demonstrated 96-100% clinical success in acute sinusitis and otitis media, but microbiologic data showed all S. pneumoniae isolates were eradicated only because the study population had predominantly susceptible strains 5
  • These older studies (1980s-1990s) predate the current era of widespread pneumococcal resistance 6, 7

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Critical Errors in Prescribing

  • Do not assume all cephalosporins are equivalent for respiratory infections—cefixime's spectrum is fundamentally different from cefuroxime, cefpodoxime, or cefdinir 1
  • Do not use cefixime for suspected pneumococcal pneumonia—it lacks adequate coverage and may lead to treatment failure 1, 2
  • Do not substitute tablets/capsules for suspension in otitis media—pharmacokinetics differ significantly 3

When to Reassess

  • If no clinical improvement occurs after 72 hours of any antibiotic therapy, switch to an agent with broader pneumococcal coverage or consider hospitalization 1
  • Therapeutic efficacy should be assessed by fever resolution (within 24 hours for pneumococcal infections) rather than cough resolution, which may persist longer 2

Bottom Line Algorithm

For pediatric bacterial respiratory infections:

  1. First-line: High-dose amoxicillin (90 mg/kg/day) or high-dose amoxicillin-clavulanate (90 mg/6.4 mg per kg per day) 1
  2. Second-line (if β-lactam allergy without anaphylaxis): Cefpodoxime, cefuroxime, or cefdinir 1
  3. Cefixime: Reserve only for combination therapy in treatment failures or when specifically treating pharyngitis/tonsillitis with documented S. pyogenes 1, 3
  4. Never use cefixime alone for suspected pneumococcal respiratory infections 1, 2

Related Questions

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.