Can a patient with ulcerative colitis (UC) use omega 3 fatty acids, specifically eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), as a treatment option?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 29, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Omega-3 Fatty Acids Should Not Be Used as Treatment for Ulcerative Colitis

Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation (EPA and DHA) should not be advised for patients with ulcerative colitis, either for treating active disease or maintaining remission. 1

Evidence Against Omega-3 Use in Ulcerative Colitis

Maintenance of Remission - No Benefit Demonstrated

The most recent and authoritative ESPEN guidelines (2017) provide a Grade B recommendation with 100% consensus against omega-3 supplementation for maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease, including ulcerative colitis. 1

Key trial findings demonstrate lack of efficacy:

  • A 2-year study showed initial improvement in relapse-free survival at 2-3 months, but this effect disappeared and cumulative relapse rates at 2 years were identical to placebo. 1

  • A 12-month trial using a combination of gamma-linolenic acid, EPA, and DHA actually showed numerically more relapses in the actively treated group compared to placebo. 1

  • Multiple systematic reviews, including a Cochrane review, concluded that omega-3 supplementation is ineffective for maintaining remission in UC patients. 1, 2

Active Disease - Insufficient Evidence and Potential Harm

For active ulcerative colitis, the evidence is even more concerning:

  • The 2006 ESPEN guidelines noted that while omega-3 fatty acids improved histological indices and leukotriene ratios, no clinical benefit was proven. 1

  • One comparative study found that sulfasalazine was superior to omega-3 fatty acids, with omega-3 treatment resulting in greater disease activity as measured by increased platelet count, ESR, C-reactive protein, and fecal nitrogen excretion. 3

  • The value of omega-3 fatty acids on disease activity remains "controversial and not proven" according to established guidelines. 1

Contradictory Research Findings

While one small crossover trial (n=11) showed a 56% decline in disease activity index with fish oil versus 4% with placebo 4, this finding has not been replicated in larger, more rigorous studies and is contradicted by the systematic review evidence. 1, 2

Clinical Implications

For patients asking about omega-3 supplementation:

  • Explain that despite theoretical anti-inflammatory properties, clinical trials have failed to demonstrate meaningful benefit for UC. 1

  • The evidence applies to both adults and children with UC. 1

  • Standard medical therapy (aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immunomodulators, biologics) remains the evidence-based approach. 1

Important Caveats

  • If patients have nutritional deficiencies, these should be corrected with appropriate supplementation (such as iron for anemia), but omega-3 is not indicated specifically for UC management. 1

  • Omega-3 supplementation for general cardiovascular health in UC patients without IBD-specific benefit is a separate consideration, though even for cardiovascular prevention, evidence is limited. 5

  • Modified enteral formulae enriched with omega-3 fatty acids are not recommended because no clear benefits have been shown. 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Omega 3 fatty acids (fish oil) for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007

Research

Comparison of omega-3 fatty acids and sulfasalazine in ulcerative colitis.

Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.), 2000

Guideline

Omega-3 Supplementation in Healthy Adults

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.