What is the difference between atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS) and typical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 1, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Distinguishing Atypical HUS from Typical HUS

The fundamental difference is that typical HUS (STEC-HUS) is caused by Shiga toxin-producing E. coli infection and represents 90% of pediatric HUS cases, while atypical HUS (aHUS) is a complement-mediated disease caused by genetic or acquired defects in the alternative complement pathway, requiring immediate treatment with complement inhibitors. 1

Etiological Differences

Typical HUS (STEC-HUS):

  • Caused by infection with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), confirmed by stool testing 1, 2
  • Represents approximately 90% of HUS cases in children but only 5-10% in adults 3, 2
  • Follows a gastrointestinal infection with STEC, with diarrhea preceding HUS by 4-5 days 1, 2

Atypical HUS (aHUS):

  • A multifactorial disease characterized by genetic or acquired (anti-CFH antibodies) anomalies affecting the alternative complement pathway 4, 1
  • Represents the majority of HUS cases in adults 3
  • Genetic mutations are found in 50-60% of cases, including mutations in complement regulatory proteins: factor H (20-30%), membrane cofactor protein/MCP (5-15%), factor I (4-10%), thrombomodulin (3-5%), C3 (2-10%), and factor B (1-4%) 4, 3
  • Anti-factor H antibodies are present in 6-10% of patients 3
  • In 40-50% of cases, no identifiable mutation or immunologic background is detected, but this does not exclude the diagnosis 4

Clinical Presentation Differences

Typical HUS:

  • Diarrhea (often bloody) precedes HUS by 4-5 days 1
  • Positive stool test for STEC or Shiga toxin 1, 5
  • Classic triad of hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and renal impairment is usually present 5

Atypical HUS:

  • Suspicion should be raised when diarrhea is absent, when the interval between diarrhea and HUS is short, or when diarrhea and HUS occur simultaneously 1
  • All three clinical signs (hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, renal involvement) may not always be clearly present at onset 4
  • In pediatric patients, particularly newborns, aHUS may be present even if one of these three parameters is absent: thrombocytopenia, anemia, or increased creatinine levels 4, 6
  • Triggers may include medications, pregnancy, malignant lesions, infections (H1N1, influenza A, HIV, SARS-CoV-2), and organ transplantation 4

Diagnostic Approach

Essential first-line tests to differentiate:

  • Stool culture and PCR for Shiga toxins/E. coli O157 to confirm or exclude STEC-HUS 1, 5
  • ADAMTS13 activity to exclude thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) 5, 6
  • Complete blood count with peripheral smear showing >1% schistocytes 5
  • Complement tests (C3, C4, CH50, and anti-complement antibodies) 5

For confirmed aHUS:

  • Genetic testing should be performed using next-generation sequencing of complement genes (CFH, CFHR1-5, C3, CD46, CFI, THBD, DGKE, CFB) 4, 5
  • However, genetic testing results should NOT delay treatment initiation 1, 5

Management Differences

Typical HUS (STEC-HUS):

  • Supportive treatment is the mainstay of therapy 1
  • Platelet transfusions are contraindicated as they can worsen microangiopathic thrombosis 1, 5
  • Most cases resolve with supportive care alone 2

Atypical HUS (aHUS):

  • Immediate initiation of complement inhibitors (eculizumab or ravulizumab) is required without waiting for genetic testing results 1, 5
  • Treatment should be administered for at least 6 months 1, 5
  • Patients must be vaccinated against meningococcal infection (serogroups A, C, W, Y, and B) at least 2 weeks prior to therapy, or receive antimicrobial prophylaxis if urgent treatment is needed 1, 7
  • Long-term antimicrobial prophylaxis is required during complement inhibitor therapy 1, 6
  • Eculizumab is FDA-approved for aHUS but NOT indicated for STEC-HUS 7

Prognosis Differences

Typical HUS:

  • Generally favorable prognosis with supportive care 2
  • Most pediatric patients recover renal function 3

Atypical HUS:

  • Without treatment, 20-50% progress to end-stage renal failure at first episode 3
  • Mortality can reach 2-10% at first episode 3
  • 50% of patients experience relapses 3
  • Risk of recurrence after discontinuation of C5 inhibitors is 10-20%, with potential for renal failure 1, 6
  • Higher mortality rates occur in children than adults with aHUS 4
  • Prognosis varies by genetic mutation: factor H mutations have the worst prognosis (20% mortality, 50% progress to ESRD), while MCP mutations have the best prognosis with preserved renal function in most cases 3

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not delay eculizumab/ravulizumab therapy while awaiting genetic testing if aHUS is suspected and STEC-HUS is excluded, as genetic mutations are found in only 50-60% of cases 1, 5
  • Do not administer platelet transfusions in HUS unless there is life-threatening bleeding, as they can worsen microangiopathic thrombosis 1, 5
  • Do not assume typical HUS based solely on presence of diarrhea, as aHUS can be triggered by infections 4
  • In transplant recipients, absence of marked thrombocytopenia or significant anemia should not exclude a TMA diagnosis 4
  • When assessing renal involvement in pediatric patients, creatinine levels must be evaluated in relation to age 4, 6

References

Guideline

Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Diagnosis and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

HUS and atypical HUS.

Blood, 2017

Research

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.

Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2011

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (aHUS) Treatment Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Diagnosis and Treatment of Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Related Questions

What is the treatment for Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (aHUS)?
What is Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (aHUS) type of anemia?
What are the diagnostic criteria and treatment for atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS)?
What are the diagnostic criteria for Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS)?
What is the best course of action for a 21-year-old male with severe anemia (hemoglobin (Hgb) 4), impaired renal function (creatinine (Cr) 30), nose bleeds, nausea, and vomiting?
What are the treatment options for a patient with renal (kidney) stones, considering size, location, composition, and underlying medical conditions?
When should a patient with lower GI bleed and a history of gastrointestinal disease, bleeding disorders, or taking anticoagulant medications, such as warfarin (coumarin) or aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), be consulted with gastro surgery?
What are the potential complications of epididymoorchitis in a young to middle-aged man with a history of sexually transmitted infections or urinary tract infections?
What is the appropriate treatment and management for hydrocephalus?
What is the best course of action for a 52-year-old female patient with diverticulitis, hypocalcemia, hypoalbuminemia, and low total protein levels, currently being treated with IV fluids, clear liquid diet, and antibiotic therapy?
What is the management approach for a patient with urosepsis secondary to left pyonephrosis following a recent left Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedure for a proximal 3rd ureterolithiasis?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.