What is a recommended neoadjuvant therapy regimen for a patient with resectable pancreas cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 5, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

For patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, neoadjuvant therapy with sequential nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by modified FOLFIRINOX is now supported by the highest-quality evidence and should be strongly considered, particularly for patients with good performance status. 1

Primary Recommendation Based on Most Recent Evidence

The 2025 randomized phase 3 trial (324 patients) demonstrated that sequential neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by modified FOLFIRINOX significantly improved event-free survival (15.3 vs 10.9 months, HR 0.71, p=0.0136) and overall survival (35.4 vs 27.2 months, HR 0.73, p=0.0477) compared to upfront surgery. 1 This represents the most definitive evidence for neoadjuvant therapy in truly resectable disease.

Current Guideline Framework

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines create a nuanced framework:

  • For clearly resectable disease without high-risk features: Neoadjuvant therapy should only be performed within clinical trials 2
  • For resectable disease with poor prognostic features: Selected patients may be considered for neoadjuvant therapy after biopsy confirmation 2
  • For borderline resectable disease: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is recommended to downsize tumors and improve resectability 2

However, the 2025 trial evidence 1 now challenges the restriction on neoadjuvant therapy for standard resectable disease, showing clear survival benefits.

Recommended Neoadjuvant Regimens

First-Line Options (in order of preference):

  1. Sequential nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by modified FOLFIRINOX - supported by the highest quality 2025 phase 3 trial 1

    • Nab-paclitaxel 75 mg/m² plus gemcitabine 600 mg/m² on days 1,8,15 of 28-day cycles (dose level 1 from phase I data) 3
    • Followed by modified FOLFIRINOX
    • Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 47.6% of patients 1
  2. FOLFIRINOX - acceptable neoadjuvant regimen for fit patients 2

  3. Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel - acceptable alternative 2

  4. Gemcitabine/cisplatin - specifically for patients with BRCA1/2 or other DNA repair mutations 2

Patient Selection Criteria

Ideal candidates for neoadjuvant therapy:

  • Good performance status (able to tolerate combination chemotherapy) 2
  • Histologic confirmation via EUS-directed biopsy (preferred method) 2
  • Treatment coordinated through or at a high-volume center 2

Patients who may not be candidates:

  • Advanced age (>75-80 years) with significant comorbidities 4
  • Poor performance status precluding intensive chemotherapy 5

Treatment Algorithm

  1. Obtain tissue diagnosis via EUS-directed biopsy 2

  2. Administer neoadjuvant chemotherapy:

    • Sequential nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine followed by modified FOLFIRINOX (preferred based on 2025 trial) 1
    • Alternative: FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel alone 2
  3. Restaging after neoadjuvant therapy to assess resectability

  4. Surgical resection if disease remains resectable or has downstaged

  5. Adjuvant chemotherapy (4 cycles, preferably gemcitabine plus capecitabine) 1

    • Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy may be candidates for additional chemotherapy after surgery and multidisciplinary review 4, 2

Key Advantages of Neoadjuvant Approach

  • Improved survival outcomes: Median OS 35.4 months vs 27.2 months with upfront surgery 1
  • Higher R0 resection rates: 63% vs 31% in PREOPANC-1 trial 6
  • Early systemic therapy delivery: All patients receive chemotherapy, not just the 50% who complete adjuvant therapy 6
  • Better patient selection: Identifies rapidly progressive disease before major surgery 7, 6
  • Addresses occult metastatic disease: Treats micrometastases present at diagnosis 7, 6

Important Caveats

  • The 2025 trial included 50% of patients with pancreatic body or tail tumors, which may have different biology than head tumors 1
  • Neoadjuvant strategies may delay potentially curative surgery in some patients with truly resectable disease 2
  • Grade ≥3 adverse events are higher with neoadjuvant therapy (47.6%) compared to upfront surgery (30.7%) 1
  • Dose-limiting toxicity (neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, liver injury) occurred in 44.4% at the recommended dose level 3

Post-Neoadjuvant Considerations

After neoadjuvant therapy and resection, patients should receive adjuvant chemotherapy:

  • Preferably gemcitabine plus capecitabine for 4 cycles 1
  • Modified FOLFIRINOX is the preferred adjuvant regimen for fit patients who did not receive it neoadjuvantly 4
  • Adjuvant chemoradiation may be offered to patients with R1 resection and/or positive lymph nodes after completing 4-6 months of systemic chemotherapy 4

References

Guideline

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Pancreatic Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Conversion Surgery After Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.