Neoadjuvant Therapy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
For patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, neoadjuvant therapy with sequential nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by modified FOLFIRINOX is now supported by the highest-quality evidence and should be strongly considered, particularly for patients with good performance status. 1
Primary Recommendation Based on Most Recent Evidence
The 2025 randomized phase 3 trial (324 patients) demonstrated that sequential neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by modified FOLFIRINOX significantly improved event-free survival (15.3 vs 10.9 months, HR 0.71, p=0.0136) and overall survival (35.4 vs 27.2 months, HR 0.73, p=0.0477) compared to upfront surgery. 1 This represents the most definitive evidence for neoadjuvant therapy in truly resectable disease.
Current Guideline Framework
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines create a nuanced framework:
- For clearly resectable disease without high-risk features: Neoadjuvant therapy should only be performed within clinical trials 2
- For resectable disease with poor prognostic features: Selected patients may be considered for neoadjuvant therapy after biopsy confirmation 2
- For borderline resectable disease: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is recommended to downsize tumors and improve resectability 2
However, the 2025 trial evidence 1 now challenges the restriction on neoadjuvant therapy for standard resectable disease, showing clear survival benefits.
Recommended Neoadjuvant Regimens
First-Line Options (in order of preference):
Sequential nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by modified FOLFIRINOX - supported by the highest quality 2025 phase 3 trial 1
FOLFIRINOX - acceptable neoadjuvant regimen for fit patients 2
Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel - acceptable alternative 2
Gemcitabine/cisplatin - specifically for patients with BRCA1/2 or other DNA repair mutations 2
Patient Selection Criteria
Ideal candidates for neoadjuvant therapy:
- Good performance status (able to tolerate combination chemotherapy) 2
- Histologic confirmation via EUS-directed biopsy (preferred method) 2
- Treatment coordinated through or at a high-volume center 2
Patients who may not be candidates:
- Advanced age (>75-80 years) with significant comorbidities 4
- Poor performance status precluding intensive chemotherapy 5
Treatment Algorithm
Obtain tissue diagnosis via EUS-directed biopsy 2
Administer neoadjuvant chemotherapy:
Restaging after neoadjuvant therapy to assess resectability
Surgical resection if disease remains resectable or has downstaged
Adjuvant chemotherapy (4 cycles, preferably gemcitabine plus capecitabine) 1
Key Advantages of Neoadjuvant Approach
- Improved survival outcomes: Median OS 35.4 months vs 27.2 months with upfront surgery 1
- Higher R0 resection rates: 63% vs 31% in PREOPANC-1 trial 6
- Early systemic therapy delivery: All patients receive chemotherapy, not just the 50% who complete adjuvant therapy 6
- Better patient selection: Identifies rapidly progressive disease before major surgery 7, 6
- Addresses occult metastatic disease: Treats micrometastases present at diagnosis 7, 6
Important Caveats
- The 2025 trial included 50% of patients with pancreatic body or tail tumors, which may have different biology than head tumors 1
- Neoadjuvant strategies may delay potentially curative surgery in some patients with truly resectable disease 2
- Grade ≥3 adverse events are higher with neoadjuvant therapy (47.6%) compared to upfront surgery (30.7%) 1
- Dose-limiting toxicity (neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, liver injury) occurred in 44.4% at the recommended dose level 3
Post-Neoadjuvant Considerations
After neoadjuvant therapy and resection, patients should receive adjuvant chemotherapy:
- Preferably gemcitabine plus capecitabine for 4 cycles 1
- Modified FOLFIRINOX is the preferred adjuvant regimen for fit patients who did not receive it neoadjuvantly 4
- Adjuvant chemoradiation may be offered to patients with R1 resection and/or positive lymph nodes after completing 4-6 months of systemic chemotherapy 4