Imaging to Rule Out Appendicitis in Children
Ultrasound of the right lower quadrant (RLQ) or complete abdomen should be the first-line imaging modality for all children with suspected appendicitis, regardless of clinical risk stratification. 1, 2
Risk-Stratified Imaging Approach
Low Clinical Risk
- No imaging is generally recommended for children with low clinical suspicion based on scoring systems (Alvarado or Pediatric Appendicitis Score) 1
- Discharge with 24-hour follow-up instructions 2
Intermediate Clinical Risk
- Start with ultrasound (US) of the RLQ or complete abdomen as the initial imaging study 1, 2
- US demonstrates sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 95% for acute appendicitis in children 2, 3
- Point-of-care ultrasound performed by emergency physicians or surgeons shows even higher accuracy with sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 97% 2
Key ultrasound findings to identify:
- Appendiceal diameter ≥6-7 mm 2, 4
- Non-compressibility of the appendix (sensitivity 98.68%, specificity 64.71%) 4
- Appendiceal tenderness during examination 2
- Maximal mural thickness >3 mm (sensitivity 61.84%, specificity 82.35%) 4
High Clinical Risk
When imaging is performed (though some institutions proceed directly to surgery):
- US abdomen RLQ may be appropriate 1
- CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast is an alternative option 1
- MRI abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast is also appropriate 1
Management After Equivocal or Non-Diagnostic Ultrasound
If initial US is equivocal or non-diagnostic and clinical suspicion persists, proceed to either MRI or CT rather than repeating ultrasound. 3
Preferred next steps:
- CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast is usually appropriate (sensitivity 96-100%, specificity 93-95%) 1, 2, 3
- MRI abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast is a radiation-free alternative (sensitivity 94%, specificity 96%) 1, 2, 3
- MRI may require sedation in young children, which is an important practical consideration 3
The ACR panel did not reach consensus on recommending CT without IV contrast or repeat US for equivocal cases 1
Suspected Complicated Appendicitis
For children with clinical suspicion or initial imaging suggesting complications (abscess, perforation, bowel obstruction), CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast is usually appropriate as the next imaging study. 1
- US has limited accuracy in distinguishing perforated from non-perforated appendicitis 1
- CT provides broader field of view for assessing complications including perforation, abscess, and bowel obstruction 1
- Complicated appendicitis occurs in approximately 30% of pediatric appendicitis cases 1
Practical Algorithm
Step 1: Risk stratify using clinical scoring (Alvarado or Pediatric Appendicitis Score) combined with physical exam and labs (WBC, CRP) 2
Step 2:
- Low risk → No imaging, discharge with follow-up 1
- Intermediate risk → Ultrasound RLQ or complete abdomen 1, 2
- High risk → Consider proceeding directly to surgery OR obtain US/CT/MRI based on institutional practice 1
Step 3: If US is equivocal/non-diagnostic:
- CT with IV contrast (faster, widely available) OR MRI without IV contrast (no radiation, may need sedation) 1, 2, 3
Step 4: If complications suspected:
- CT abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Do not proceed directly to CT without attempting ultrasound first in children, as this exposes them to unnecessary ionizing radiation when US has excellent specificity (95%) 2, 5, 6
Do not dismiss appendicitis based on negative ultrasound alone if clinical suspicion remains high—US sensitivity is only 76%, and non-visualization of the appendix is common 2, 6, 7
Do not repeat ultrasound after an equivocal study—this delays diagnosis without improving accuracy; proceed to CT or MRI instead 3, 7
Ultrasound accuracy is highly operator-dependent, so institutional expertise should guide the imaging pathway 2, 8
Both MRI and ultrasound may incorrectly classify up to half of perforated appendicitis cases as simple appendicitis, so maintain high clinical suspicion for complications 2
Radiation Considerations
- Children are at inherently higher risk from radiation exposure due to organ sensitivity and longer life expectancy for potential effects to manifest 1
- The ultrasound-first approach can eliminate CT use in at least 33.7% of pediatric cases 5
- When CT is necessary, low-dose protocols maintain diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 97.8%, specificity 100%) while minimizing radiation 5
- Oral contrast is not necessary for CT and delays diagnosis without improving accuracy 2, 9