Surgical Indications for Acute Intracranial Hemorrhage
Immediate Surgical Evacuation Required
Large cerebellar hemorrhages ≥3 cm with brainstem compression or hydrocephalus require immediate surgical evacuation as soon as possible—this is a Class I recommendation where medical management alone results in poor outcomes. 1, 2, 3
Cerebellar Hemorrhage Criteria
Hematoma diameter ≥3 cm (volume ≥15 mL) with any of the following mandates urgent craniotomy: 1, 2
- Brainstem compression on imaging
- Fourth ventricle obliteration or obstruction
- Hydrocephalus development
- Clinical deterioration regardless of initial GCS score
Critical pitfall: External ventricular drainage (EVD) alone is insufficient and potentially harmful when brainstem compression exists—these patients require hematoma evacuation, not just CSF diversion. 2, 4
Supratentorial Hemorrhage: Selective Surgical Indications
Surgery may be beneficial for lobar hemorrhages within 1 cm of the cortical surface in patients with GCS 9-12, showing a 29% relative benefit in functional outcome compared to medical management. 1, 3
Lobar Hemorrhage Surgical Criteria
- Location: Hemorrhage extending to within 1 cm of cortical surface (trend toward improved outcomes: OR 0.69,95% CI 0.47-1.01) 3
- Consciousness level: GCS score 9-12 at presentation 1, 3
- Volume: Hematoma >15 mL associated with mortality benefit from surgery 3
- Clinical deterioration: Progressive neurological worsening despite medical management 2, 3
Additional Supratentorial Surgical Indications
- Midline shift >5 mm combined with hematoma thickness >10 mm or neurological deterioration 3
- Lifesaving measure: Patients with impending herniation, large hematomas with significant mass effect, or refractory elevated ICP 3, 5
- Decompressive craniectomy (with or without evacuation) may reduce mortality in comatose patients with large hematomas and significant midline shift 3
Contraindications to Surgery
Deep hemorrhages (basal ganglia, thalamus, putamen) consistently show worse outcomes with surgical intervention and should be managed conservatively. 2
Absolute Medical Management Preferred
- Deep ganglionic hemorrhages: STICH trial showed no benefit (26% favorable outcome surgical vs. 24% medical, OR 0.89) 2, 3
- Patients in deep coma (GCS ≤5-8): Tend to do better with medical management; surgery is probably harmful 1, 2
- Small hemorrhages <10 mL: No demonstrated benefit from surgical evacuation 2
- Lobar hemorrhages >1 cm from cortical surface: Do not benefit from evacuation 2
- Minimal deficits (GCS >12): Surgery introduces unnecessary risks without proven benefit 2
- Small cerebellar hemorrhages <3 cm without brainstem compression: Better outcomes with medical management alone 2
Relative Contraindications
- Advanced age (>70-80 years) with significant comorbidities creates prohibitive surgical risk 2
- Ultra-early surgery (<4 hours): Carries increased rebleeding risk and should be approached with caution 3
Timing Considerations
- Optimal window: Surgical intervention within 8 hours of hemorrhage may improve outcomes based on meta-analysis 3
- Avoid ultra-early (<4 hours): Increased rebleeding risk 3
- Monitor for deterioration: 26% of medically managed patients in STICH required crossover to surgery due to clinical worsening—this conversion may be lifesaving 2, 5
Special Populations
Epidural Hematoma (Traumatic)
- Volume >30 cm³: Surgical evacuation regardless of GCS score 6
- Coma (GCS <9) with anisocoria: Evacuate as soon as possible 6
- Conservative criteria: EDH <30 cm³, thickness <15 mm, midline shift <5 mm, GCS >8, no focal deficit—can observe with serial CT in neurosurgical center 6
Intraventricular Hemorrhage with Hydrocephalus
- EVD placement indicated for hydrocephalus from IVH 1
- Consider intraventricular fibrinolytic therapy (e.g., urokinase) in selected patients—one-year survival significantly higher (p=0.014) 1
Pontine/Brainstem Hemorrhage
- Routine surgical evacuation NOT recommended by AHA guidelines—fundamentally different from cerebellar hemorrhage 4
- Observation period: 24-72 hours after stabilization recommended before definitive prognostic decisions 4
- Medical management priorities: BP control (systolic <160 mmHg), airway protection, ICU monitoring 4
Critical Decision Algorithm
- Identify location: Cerebellar vs. supratentorial vs. brainstem
- Cerebellar ≥3 cm + compression/hydrocephalus → Immediate surgery
- Supratentorial lobar within 1 cm of surface + GCS 9-12 → Consider surgery
- Deep ganglionic location → Medical management
- GCS ≤5-8 (deep coma) → Medical management (surgery harmful)
- Progressive deterioration on medical management → Convert to surgical approach
- Impending herniation/refractory ICP → Emergency decompression
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not equate all intracranial hemorrhages: Cerebellar hemorrhage has strong surgical indication; pontine hemorrhage does not 4
- Do not continue conservative management if deterioration occurs: Crossover to surgery may be lifesaving 2, 5
- Do not operate on deep hemorrhages expecting benefit: Consistently worse outcomes than medical management 2
- Do not use minimally invasive techniques as standard: STICH showed worse outcomes (OR 1.3) compared to conservative management 1