In a 74-year-old woman with acute epigastric pain radiating to the back, leukocytosis, mild lipase elevation, CT showing peripancreatic inflammation, segmental colonic wall thickening near the splenic flexure, and mild ascites, what are three differential diagnoses, how can each be ruled in or out using clinical exam, imaging, and laboratory findings, and what are the top three priorities for her admission management?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 16, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Differential Diagnoses and Diagnostic Approach

Three Most Likely Differential Diagnoses

In this 74-year-old woman with acute epigastric pain radiating to the back, mildly elevated lipase, peripancreatic inflammation, and segmental colonic wall thickening, the three differential diagnoses are: (1) acute pancreatitis with concurrent infectious colitis, (2) mesenteric ischemia affecting both pancreatic and colonic vasculature, and (3) perforated peptic ulcer with secondary colonic inflammation.


Diagnosis 1: Acute Pancreatitis with Concurrent Infectious Colitis

Rule In:

  • Serum lipase ≥2× upper limit of normal is the preferred diagnostic test with 80-90% specificity for acute pancreatitis 1
  • CT findings of peripancreatic inflammation confirm pancreatitis and help identify necrosis, which raises mortality from 0-11% to approximately 40% 1
  • Procalcitonin is the most sensitive biomarker for pancreatic infection; low levels strongly predict absence of infected necrosis 1
  • Elevated lipase can occur in infectious colitis without pancreatitis, particularly when there is colonic inflammation near the splenic flexure 2
  • The combination of segmental colonic wall thickening and loose stools supports concurrent infectious colitis 3

Rule Out:

  • If lipase is only mildly elevated (not ≥2× normal), pancreatitis becomes less likely and colitis with secondary lipase elevation is more probable 2
  • Absence of pancreatic necrosis on CT and normal procalcitonin argue against severe pancreatitis 1
  • Stool cultures and C. difficile testing can confirm infectious colitis as the primary process 3
  • If epigastric pain resolves with antibiotics alone without pancreas-specific therapy, infectious colitis was likely the primary diagnosis 2

Diagnosis 2: Mesenteric Ischemia (Acute Mesenteric Ischemia or Ischemic Colitis)

Rule In:

  • Pain out of proportion to physical examination is the hallmark of acute mesenteric ischemia, particularly in elderly patients with vascular risk factors 3, 1
  • Metabolic acidosis and elevated lactate are highly suggestive of bowel ischemia 3
  • CT angiography (CTA) of abdomen/pelvis is the gold standard, showing arterial occlusion, venous thrombosis, or bowel wall pneumatosis 3
  • Segmental colonic wall thickening near the splenic flexure (watershed area) is classic for ischemic colitis 4
  • Atrial fibrillation on apixaban raises concern for embolic acute mesenteric ischemia if anticoagulation is subtherapeutic 3
  • Hypoalbuminemia and frailty suggest chronic mesenteric ischemia with acute decompensation 3

Rule Out:

  • Normal arterial flow on CTA excludes acute mesenteric artery thrombosis or embolism 3
  • Absence of pneumatosis intestinalis, portal venous gas, or bowel wall thinning argues against transmural infarction 3
  • Improvement with fluid resuscitation and antibiotics suggests non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia or infectious colitis rather than embolic/thrombotic ischemia 3
  • Colonoscopy showing mucosal ulceration limited to the splenic flexure confirms ischemic colitis rather than acute mesenteric ischemia 4

Diagnosis 3: Perforated Peptic Ulcer with Secondary Colonic Inflammation

Rule In:

  • CT findings of extraluminal gas (97% sensitivity), fluid/fat stranding (89%), focal wall defect (84%), and ascites (89%) are diagnostic of perforation 5, 1
  • Sudden, severe epigastric pain that may generalize, accompanied by fever and abdominal rigidity, is classic for perforation 5
  • Leukocytosis and metabolic acidosis support sepsis from perforation 5
  • Hypoactive bowel sounds and mild distention are consistent with peritonitis 5
  • Perforated peptic ulcer carries approximately 30% mortality if treatment is delayed, making early recognition critical 5, 1

Rule Out:

  • Absence of free intraperitoneal air on CT makes perforation unlikely (97% sensitivity) 5, 1
  • Chest and abdominal X-ray showing no free air can help exclude perforation when CT is unavailable 1
  • If epigastric tenderness is mild without rebound or rigidity, perforation is less likely 5
  • Upper endoscopy showing intact mucosa definitively excludes perforation 5
  • Improvement with PPI therapy and antibiotics alone argues against perforation, which requires surgical intervention 5

Top Three Admission Priorities

Priority 1: Exclude Life-Threatening Cardiovascular Emergencies

Obtain a 12-lead ECG within 10 minutes of presentation to exclude acute coronary syndrome, especially in this elderly diabetic woman who may present atypically with isolated epigastric pain. 1, 6

  • Missed myocardial infarction presenting as epigastric pain carries 10-20% mortality 1
  • Check serial troponins at 0 and 6 hours 6
  • Assess for leaking abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients >50 years with vascular risk factors 1
  • Hypotension (BP 96/58 mmHg) and tachycardia (HR 108 bpm) are red flags for cardiogenic shock, sepsis, or hemorrhage 1

Priority 2: Aggressive Fluid Resuscitation and Hemodynamic Stabilization

Begin intravenous crystalloid resuscitation immediately, targeting urine output >0.5 mL/kg/h, while monitoring for fluid overload given the patient's age and cardiac history. 3, 1

  • Aggressive fluid resuscitation (>10 mL/kg/h initially) is indicated for acute pancreatitis, but recent evidence suggests caution in non-severe cases to avoid fluid overload 3
  • Tachycardia ≥110 bpm, fever ≥37.9°C, and hypotension are highly specific for sepsis, perforation, or anastomotic leak 1
  • Metabolic acidosis and elevated lactate require urgent correction and suggest bowel ischemia or sepsis 3
  • Hold apixaban until surgical emergencies are excluded and bleeding risk is assessed 3
  • Maintain nil per os status until perforation and bowel obstruction are ruled out 1

Priority 3: Urgent Contrast-Enhanced CT and Surgical Consultation

Perform immediate contrast-enhanced CT of abdomen/pelvis to confirm pancreatitis, identify necrosis, detect perforation, assess for mesenteric ischemia, and rule out surgical emergencies. 3, 1

  • CT with IV contrast is the gold standard for evaluating acute nonlocalized abdominal pain with fever 3
  • CTA is essential for mesenteric ischemia, showing arterial occlusion, venous thrombosis, or bowel wall pneumatosis 3
  • Extraluminal gas (97%), fluid/fat stranding (89%), and focal wall defects (84%) confirm perforation 5, 1
  • Peripancreatic inflammation on CT confirms pancreatitis and identifies necrosis, which raises mortality to 30-40% 1
  • Obtain surgical consultation immediately if perforation, bowel ischemia, or necrotizing pancreatitis is identified 3, 1
  • Start empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics (e.g., piperacillin-tazobactam) for suspected perforation, colitis, or infected pancreatic necrosis 3, 1
  • Initiate high-dose PPI therapy (omeprazole 40 mg IV twice daily) while awaiting definitive diagnosis, given the possibility of peptic ulcer disease 1, 6

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Delaying CT in elderly patients with nonspecific abdominal pain and fever leads to missed diagnoses of perforation, ischemia, or complicated diverticulitis 3, 4
  • Attributing all symptoms to pancreatitis when lipase is only mildly elevated may miss infectious colitis or other causes 2
  • Failing to obtain ECG and troponins in elderly diabetic patients with epigastric pain can result in missed myocardial infarction 1, 6
  • Overlooking mesenteric ischemia in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation, metabolic acidosis, and pain out of proportion to exam is a fatal error 3, 1
  • Assuming functional dyspepsia in a patient with persistent vomiting, weight loss, and epigastric tenderness ignores red-flag features that mandate urgent investigation 5, 1

{"question": "A patient in their 70s presents to the emergency department with acute onset epigastric and abdominal pain radiating to the back, associated with nausea, early satiety, and several episodes of loose stools over the past 48 hours. The patient reports a 10-lb unintentional weight loss over the past 3 months, decreased appetite, and fatigue. Medical history includes hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation on apixaban, and osteoarthritis. The patient lives alone and reports difficulty preparing meals. On exam, the patient appears frail. Vital signs show HR 108 bpm, BP 96/58 mm Hg, T 37.9°C. Abdominal exam reveals epigastric tenderness without rebound, mild abdominal distention, and hypoactive bowel sounds. Laboratory studies demonstrate leukocytosis, mildly elevated lipase, metabolic acidosis, and hypoalbuminemia. CT abdomen shows peripancreatic inflammation, segmental colonic wall thickening near the splenic flexure, and mild ascites. Please list three differential diagnoses. How would you differentiate (rule in/rule out) each of the diagnoses based on clinical exam, imaging, and lab values. Please list your top three priorities that you would address for this patient during admission."}

References

Guideline

Acute Pancreatitis – Evidence‑Based Diagnostic and Management Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Elevated lipase without pancreatitis in infectious colitis.

The Journal of emergency medicine, 2015

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

CT of acute abdomen in the elderly.

Insights into imaging, 2025

Guideline

Epigastric Pain Causes and Diagnostic Approach

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach to Epigastric Pain with Swallowing

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Related Questions

What is the complete management for abdominal pain?
How to differentiate acute abdominal pains in emergency settings?
What is the initial workup for a 40-year-old patient presenting with abdominal pain?
What is the baseline workup for a patient presenting with abdominal pain?
What is the best course of action for a patient with epigastric abdominal pain and pruritus, elevated INR (International Normalized Ratio) on clopidogrel, and slightly elevated lipase?
What is the appropriate comment and management for a 69-year-old overweight male (BMI ≈33 kg/m²) with early-stage avascular necrosis of the femoral head involving about 20% of the articular surface and no radiographic collapse?
What daily magnesium intake and supplementation regimen is recommended for an adult to support heart health, and what safety precautions (renal impairment, drug interactions, monitoring) should be considered?
For adults undergoing major abdominal surgery, how does epidural analgesia prevent postoperative ileus, what is the recommended continuous lumbar or thoracic epidural regimen (low‑dose local anesthetic plus a small opioid infusion for 48–72 hours), and how should ileus be managed if it develops while on the epidural?
What is the recommended pain management regimen for a patient with symptomatic cholelithiasis (gallstone disease) presenting with biliary colic?
What is the appropriate management for a 62-year-old woman with a normal comprehensive metabolic panel, controlled low-density lipoprotein (LDL) at 69 mg/dL on atorvastatin 20 mg daily, high‑normal high-density lipoprotein (HDL) at 63 mg/dL, hypertriglyceridemia at 219 mg/dL, prediabetes (hemoglobin A1c 5.7 %), normal vitamin D at 38.8 ng/mL, normal complete blood count, iron studies, ferritin, transferrin, and thyroid function, and microscopic hematuria (3–10 red blood cells per high‑power field) with calcium oxalate crystals on urinalysis?
Do elevated red‑cell‑derived microparticles (RMP) increase the risk of thrombosis in children?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.