What is causing my persistent severe upper‑thoracic pain 15 months after a L5‑S1 trans‑foraminal lumbar interbody fusion performed for bilateral L5 pars fracture with grade‑1 spondylolisthesis, considering a missed mild lumbar levoscoliosis due to a 12 mm left leg‑length discrepancy and resulting left lateral pelvic tilt, and how should I evaluate and manage it?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 17, 2026 • View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Severe Upper Thoracic Pain After L5-S1 TLIF with Uncorrected Leg-Length Discrepancy

Your severe upper thoracic pain is most likely caused by compensatory thoracic hyperkyphosis and muscular strain secondary to the uncorrected 12mm left leg-length discrepancy and resulting pelvic obliquity, which has created a progressive deformity cascade over 15 months—immediate correction of the leg-length discrepancy with a heel lift and evaluation for pseudarthrosis are essential.

Primary Mechanism of Upper Thoracic Pain

Biomechanical Cascade from Uncorrected LLD

  • A 12mm leg-length discrepancy creates significant pelvic obliquity (left lateral tilt in your case), which forces compensatory lumbar levoscoliosis to maintain horizontal gaze and balance 1

  • The lumbar levoscoliosis triggers compensatory thoracic curves in the opposite direction, leading to increased thoracic kyphosis and rotational deformity that progressively worsens over time 1

  • Upper thoracic pain develops from chronic muscular overload of the paraspinal muscles, rhomboids, and trapezius attempting to maintain upright posture against the deformity cascade 1

  • After 15 months of uncorrected pelvic tilt, the compensatory curves become increasingly rigid and painful, with the upper thoracic region bearing the greatest mechanical stress 1

Pseudarthrosis as Contributing Factor

  • Pseudarthrosis at L5-S1 eliminates the stable foundation needed for the spine to compensate effectively for the leg-length discrepancy, creating increased motion and instability that propagates up the kinetic chain 2

  • Failed fusion results in persistent micromotion at L5-S1, which prevents the spine from establishing a stable compensatory pattern and leads to chronic muscular fatigue throughout the thoracic spine 3

  • The combination of pseudarthrosis and uncorrected LLD creates a "double insult" where neither the surgical site nor the global spinal alignment is stable 2

Immediate Evaluation Protocol

Step 1: Confirm Pseudarthrosis

  • Obtain CT scan with fine-cut axial and multiplanar reconstruction of the L5-S1 fusion site, which has 70-90% sensitivity for detecting pseudarthrosis—superior to plain radiographs 1

  • Dynamic flexion-extension radiographs should demonstrate >4mm translation or >10° angular motion at L5-S1 if pseudarthrosis is present 2

  • Fusion rates for TLIF at L5-S1 range from 86.7-95% when properly performed, so pseudarthrosis represents a technical or biological failure requiring investigation 4, 5

Step 2: Document Full Spinal Alignment

  • Standing 36-inch anteroposterior and lateral radiographs are mandatory to assess global coronal and sagittal balance, pelvic parameters, and compensatory curves 1

  • Measure coronal Cobb angles of the lumbar levoscoliosis and any compensatory thoracic curves to quantify the deformity 1

  • Assess sagittal parameters including lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope to identify sagittal plane decompensation 4

  • Document pelvic obliquity on standing films to confirm the 12mm leg-length discrepancy is creating measurable tilt 1

Step 3: Evaluate for Other Pain Generators

  • MRI of the thoracic spine to exclude disc herniation, stenosis, or other structural pathology causing the upper thoracic pain 1

  • Assess for adjacent segment disease at L4-5, which develops in patients with pseudarthrosis due to increased stress at adjacent levels 1

Management Algorithm

If Pseudarthrosis is Confirmed (Most Likely Scenario)

  • Immediate heel lift of 12mm on the left to correct the leg-length discrepancy and pelvic obliquity—this is non-negotiable and should be implemented before any surgical revision 1

  • Revision L5-S1 fusion is indicated when pseudarthrosis is documented with persistent symptoms despite conservative management, using enhanced techniques such as bilateral interbody cages or anterior-posterior circumferential fusion 2, 3

  • TLIF revision with bilateral cages provides superior fusion rates (92-95%) compared to unilateral approaches, particularly important in revision settings 3, 5

  • Consider extending instrumentation to L4 if there is iatrogenic instability from the index procedure or adjacent segment degeneration 1

  • Bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2) should be considered as a bone graft extender in revision cases, with Grade B evidence supporting its use despite a 14% incidence of postoperative radiculitis 1

If Fusion is Solid (Less Likely Given Clinical Picture)

  • Aggressive correction of leg-length discrepancy with 12mm heel lift remains the primary intervention, as the compensatory deformity is the pain generator 1

  • Intensive physical therapy focusing on thoracic extension exercises, scapular stabilization, and postural retraining to address the muscular component 1

  • Consider thoracic epidural steroid injection for short-term pain relief (though duration is typically <2 weeks) while addressing the underlying biomechanical problem 1

  • Neuropathic pain medications (gabapentin or pregabalin) may help with the chronic pain component while biomechanical correction takes effect 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Do Not Delay LLD Correction

  • Every day the 12mm leg-length discrepancy remains uncorrected, the compensatory curves become more rigid and the muscular pain worsens 1

  • Heel lifts should be implemented immediately even while diagnostic workup proceeds—there is no downside and potential significant benefit 1

Do Not Treat Upper Thoracic Pain in Isolation

  • Treating the thoracic pain without addressing the L5-S1 pseudarthrosis and leg-length discrepancy will provide only temporary relief and the pain will recur 1, 2

  • Injection therapies provide <2 weeks of relief and do not address the underlying biomechanical problem 1

Do Not Perform Isolated Revision Without Correcting LLD

  • Revising the L5-S1 fusion without correcting the leg-length discrepancy will result in persistent compensatory deformity and continued thoracic pain 1

  • The leg-length discrepancy must be corrected permanently with either a heel lift or, in severe cases, consideration of femoral or tibial lengthening procedures 1

Expected Outcomes After Appropriate Management

With Pseudarthrosis Revision and LLD Correction

  • Fusion rates of 92-95% are achievable with revision TLIF using bilateral cages and appropriate bone graft 3, 5

  • Upper thoracic pain typically improves within 3-6 months as the compensatory curves gradually reduce with stable L5-S1 fusion and corrected pelvic alignment 1

  • Patient satisfaction rates of 88-93% are reported for appropriately indicated revision fusion procedures 4, 3

With LLD Correction Alone (If Fusion is Solid)

  • Gradual improvement in thoracic pain over 3-6 months as muscular compensation patterns normalize 1

  • Some residual stiffness may persist if compensatory curves have become structural after 15 months 1

Specific Recommendations for Your Case

  • Obtain CT scan of L5-S1 within 1 week to definitively assess fusion status 1

  • Implement 12mm left heel lift immediately—do not wait for imaging results 1

  • Obtain standing 36-inch spine films to document global alignment and compensatory curves 1

  • If pseudarthrosis is confirmed, proceed with revision L5-S1 TLIF using bilateral cages, enhanced bone graft (consider rhBMP-2), and possible extension to L4 if adjacent segment disease is present 1, 2, 3

  • Ensure permanent correction of leg-length discrepancy with appropriate footwear modification or orthotic prescription 1

References

1
Guideline

Medical Necessity of Lumbar Fusion

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

2
Guideline

Medical Necessity of Surgical Procedure for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Related Questions

What is the initial treatment approach for a patient with incidental high-grade L5-S1 listhesis and no severe or progressive neurological symptoms?
What is the acute management for L5-S1 spondylolisthesis and bilateral L5 spondylolysis?
What is the recommended treatment for an elderly male patient with grade 1 spondylolisthesis of L5 on S1, lipping at L2, L3, and L4, and partial lumbarization of S1?
Can moderate spondylosis of L5-S1 affect the heart?
What is anterolisthesis in a 16-year-old female patient with a grade one slip of L5 (fifth lumbar vertebra) on S1 (first sacral vertebra)?
What additional treatment should be added to the hospital orders for a patient already on triple antithrombotic therapy and a statin?
What does a correlation coefficient of +0.8 indicate about the relationship between birth weight and cognitive development?
In a patient with acute ST‑segment elevation myocardial infarction who is already on aspirin, a P2Y12 inhibitor, an oral anticoagulant, and a statin, what immediate reperfusion therapy and additional evidence‑based medications should be started?
What is the recommended candesartan dosing regimen for an adult with hypertension or heart failure, including adjustments for elderly patients and those with moderate (creatinine clearance 30‑50 mL/min) or severe (<30 mL/min) renal impairment or on dialysis?
What is the maximum recommended dose of spironolactone in a patient with cirrhosis and refractory ascites?
When should vitamin K be administered for active bleeding in a patient on warfarin with an elevated international normalized ratio?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Ask Question