What are the differences between a pseudoaneurysm and a true aneurysm in terms of definition, etiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 17, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Pseudoaneurysm versus True Aneurysm

A pseudoaneurysm is a contained rupture of the arterial wall where blood leaks outside the vessel but remains confined by surrounding soft tissue, lacking the normal three-layer arterial wall structure, whereas a true aneurysm is a dilatation involving all three intact layers of the vessel wall (intima, media, and adventitia). 1, 2

Definition and Structural Differences

The fundamental distinction lies in wall architecture:

  • True aneurysm: The wall contains all three normal histological components of the arterial wall—intima, media, and adventitia—in a dilated configuration 2, 3
  • Pseudoaneurysm: Represents a full-thickness arterial wall disruption where the "wall" consists only of fibrous peel, adventitia, and perivascular connective tissue that has formed around the perforation 1, 2, 4
  • The pseudoaneurysm creates a "pulsating hematoma" that maintains free communication with the intravascular space through the arterial defect 1, 5

Etiology

True aneurysms develop from:

  • Degenerative atherosclerotic disease 6
  • Genetic connective tissue disorders 6
  • Chronic hypertension 6
  • Inflammatory arteritis 6

Pseudoaneurysms arise from:

  • Traumatic injury: Blunt deceleration trauma (motor vehicle accidents, falls) is the most common cause, particularly affecting the thoracic aorta at the isthmus in 45% of cases 6, 1
  • Iatrogenic injury: Arterial catheterization (0.1-0.2% after diagnostic angiography, 3.5-5.5% after interventional procedures), surgical procedures, or catheter-based interventions 6, 1
  • Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers: Erosion through the arterial wall in elderly patients with diffuse atherosclerosis 6, 1
  • Infection: Mycotic aneurysms or arterial erosion from adjacent infection 6, 1

Clinical Presentation

True aneurysms typically present as:

  • Asymptomatic incidental findings on imaging 6
  • Symptoms from mass effect on adjacent structures 6
  • Acute rupture with hemodynamic collapse 7

Pseudoaneurysms present as:

  • Pulsatile, painful mass at the site of injury 5, 8
  • Symptoms mimicking coarctation (arm BP > leg BP, interscapular murmur) in thoracic aortic pseudoaneurysms 6
  • Compression syndromes: Venous thrombosis, painful neuropathy from femoral nerve compression, or soft tissue erosion 6
  • Critical pitfall: Physical examination alone misses more than 60% of pseudoaneurysms, making them easily confused with hematomas or abscesses 1

Diagnosis

Imaging approach differs by location and stability:

Femoral/Peripheral Pseudoaneurysms

  • Duplex ultrasound is the first-line diagnostic test, showing a hypoechoic image communicating with the arterial lumen 6, 5
  • Color Doppler demonstrates characteristic "to-and-fro" flow pattern in the neck 6, 4

Thoracic/Abdominal Aortic Pseudoaneurysms

  • CT angiography is the gold standard (91.4% sensitivity, 93.6% specificity), showing contrast extravasation, periaortic hematoma, and the characteristic "mushroom-like outpouching with overhanging edges" 6, 7, 3
  • Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) provides high accuracy for bedside diagnosis in unstable patients 6, 7
  • Chest radiograph may show mediastinal widening or nasogastric tube displacement (80% sensitivity) but is neither sensitive nor specific 6, 7

Key imaging distinction: True aneurysms show smooth, symmetric dilatation with intact wall layers, while pseudoaneurysms demonstrate focal outpouching with a narrow "neck" corresponding to the point of arterial penetration 6, 3

Management

Small Femoral Pseudoaneurysms (<2.0 cm)

Conservative management is appropriate for asymptomatic lesions: 6, 1

  • 61% resolve spontaneously within 7-52 days without antithrombotic therapy 6, 1
  • Re-evaluate with duplex ultrasound at 1 month (Class IIa, Level B) 6
  • Only 11% ultimately require surgical intervention 6

Larger Femoral Pseudoaneurysms (≥2.0 cm)

Active intervention is indicated: 6, 1

  • Ultrasound-guided thrombin injection is first-line therapy for uncomplicated pseudoaneurysms 6
  • Ultrasound-guided compression therapy is an alternative but causes more pain and has longer compression times 6
  • Surgical repair is reasonable for pseudoaneurysms ≥2.0 cm that persist or recur after thrombin injection (Class IIa, Level B) 6

Thoracic Aortic Pseudoaneurysms

Urgent repair is mandatory due to high rupture risk: 6, 1

  • Pseudoaneurysms rarely resolve spontaneously and inevitably enlarge if left untreated 6, 1
  • Endovascular stent-graft repair is preferred when anatomically suitable 6
  • Open surgical repair for lesions not amenable to endovascular approach 6

Critical Management Pitfalls

  • Never insert a chest tube blindly in suspected thoracic aortic pseudoaneurysm—this can precipitate catastrophic exsanguination; obtain CTA first and achieve definitive aortic control before pleural drainage 9
  • Infected femoral pseudoaneurysms require extensive operative debridement with autogenous reconstruction or extra-anatomic bypass 6
  • Skin erosion or expanding rupture into soft tissue mandates urgent surgical repair regardless of size 6

Natural History and Prognosis

Size-dependent outcomes for pseudoaneurysms:

  • Small lesions (<2.0 cm): 90% spontaneous closure within 2 months 6, 1
  • Large lesions (≥2.0 cm): Progressive enlargement under arterial pressure with high rupture risk 1
  • When pressure within the pseudoaneurysm exceeds wall tension of surrounding tissue, fatal rupture occurs 1

True aneurysms: Rupture risk correlates with size and growth rate, with abdominal aortic aneurysms >5.5 cm carrying significant annual rupture risk 7

References

Guideline

Pseudoaneurysm Pathophysiology and Clinical Consequences

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Renal aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms.

Clinical imaging, 2011

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management and Outcomes of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Diagnosis and management of pseudoaneurysms: an update.

Current problems in diagnostic radiology, 2009

Guideline

Aortic Rupture as a Cause of Tension Hemothorax

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.