Are café‑au‑lait macules normal, and at what size, number, or features do they become pathological (e.g., indicative of neurofibromatosis type 1)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 18, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Café-au-Lait Spots: Normal vs. Pathological

Isolated café-au-lait macules (CALMs) are normal in up to 25% of healthy children, but become pathological when ≥6 spots are present with each measuring ≥5mm in prepubertal children or ≥15mm postpubertal, which meets diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and carries an 8-15 year reduction in life expectancy. 1, 2

When CALMs Are Normal

  • 1-2 isolated CALMs without other features are considered low-risk and benign, occurring in up to 25% of preschool-aged children 1, 3, 4
  • Fair-skinned children with red or blond hair may have 5-15 feathery, irregular CALMs with no other NF1 features and appear unlikely to develop pathological conditions 5
  • Solitary CALMs are common birthmarks in up to 2.5% of normal neonates 4

When CALMs Become Pathological

Primary Diagnostic Threshold: Neurofibromatosis Type 1

The critical threshold is ≥6 CALMs meeting size criteria (≥5mm prepubertal, ≥15mm postpubertal), which is one of the NIH diagnostic criteria for NF1 1, 2. NF1 affects 1 in 2,000-3,000 people and requires lifelong surveillance due to:

  • 8.5% risk of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) by age 30, rising to 15.8% by age 85 2
  • 15-20% risk of optic pathway gliomas in young children 1
  • Significantly increased breast cancer risk requiring mammography starting at age 30 2

Additional Pathological Features to Assess

Perform a comprehensive skin and systemic examination looking for:

  • Axillary or inguinal freckling (Crowe's sign) - highly specific for NF1, typically appears within first 3 years of life 1, 2
  • Cutaneous or subcutaneous neurofibromas - diagnostic for NF1 1, 2
  • Lisch nodules on slit-lamp examination (iris hamartomas) - diagnostic for NF1 1, 2
  • Plexiform neurofibromas - may be congenital but subtle in infancy 1

Alternative Genetic Syndromes to Consider

CALMs plus specific associated features suggest non-NF1 syndromes:

  • RASopathies (Noonan, Costello, CBL syndromes): CALMs + dysmorphic facial features + congenital heart defects + short stature + cryptorchidism 1, 2
  • Legius syndrome: CALMs + freckling but NO neurofibromas, NO optic gliomas, NO tumor risk - requires SPRED1 genetic testing to distinguish from NF1 2
  • Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency (CMMRD): CALMs + hypopigmented spots + pilomatrixomas + childhood cancers (leukemia, brain tumors, GI malignancies) - carries extremely high cancer risk 6, 1, 2, 3
  • McCune-Albright syndrome: Large segmental CALMs + precocious puberty + fibrous dysplasia 3

Clinical Management Algorithm

For Children with Multiple CALMs (≥3 spots):

  1. Document exact number and measure size of each CALM to determine if ≥6 spots meet size criteria 1, 2

  2. Examine for NF1-associated features:

    • Axillary/inguinal freckling 1, 2
    • Any neurofibromas (cutaneous, subcutaneous, or plexiform) 1, 2
    • Slit-lamp examination for Lisch nodules 1, 2
    • Visual assessment for optic pathway gliomas 1
  3. Screen for alternative syndromes:

    • Dysmorphic features, heart defects, short stature (RASopathies) 1, 2
    • Hypopigmented spots, pilomatrixomas, family history of childhood cancers (CMMRD) 1, 2
  4. Obtain detailed three-generation family history examining for CALMs, neurofibromatosis, childhood cancers, learning disabilities, unexplained tumors 1

Referral Criteria to Genetics

Immediate referral is warranted for: 1, 2

  • ≥2 NIH diagnostic criteria for NF1 met
  • CALMs + developmental delays, hypotonia, or neurologic symptoms (high-risk for CMMRD or other genetic conditions)
  • CALMs + dysmorphic features suggesting RASopathy
  • CALMs + family history of childhood cancers
  • CALMs + childhood leukemia diagnosed at age <18

Surveillance Protocol

For children with multiple CALMs but <2 NF1 criteria (intermediate-risk): 1

  • Clinical examination every 3-6 months during first 3 years of life
  • Annual visits after age 3-5 years if no additional features develop
  • Monitor for new skin freckling, skin lumps, vision changes, developmental concerns

For confirmed NF1 (≥2 NIH criteria met): 2

  • Refer to specialized NF1 clinic for coordinated care
  • Annual comprehensive physical examination throughout life
  • Blood pressure monitoring for pheochromocytoma and renovascular hypertension
  • Neurologic examination for new deficits
  • Women: annual mammography starting age 30, consider breast MRI ages 30-50

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not confuse Legius syndrome with NF1 - Legius patients have CALMs and freckling but lack tumor risks and require different surveillance; genetic testing (SPRED1 vs. NF1 gene) definitively distinguishes these 2
  • Do not delay referral in children with CALMs plus developmental delays, hypotonia, or childhood leukemia - these suggest CMMRD or other syndromic diagnoses requiring immediate specialized care 6, 1, 2
  • Do not provide false reassurance about benign nature in fair-skinned children with >6 CALMs - while some fair-skinned children with feathery CALMs may not develop NF1, proper documentation and surveillance are still required 5
  • Do not overlook CMMRD - it can mimic NF1 with CALMs, freckling, neurofibromas, and Lisch nodules in up to one-third of patients, but has higher frequency of hypopigmented spots and pilomatrixomas 2

Parent Education Priorities

Instruct parents to urgently report: 1, 2

  • New skin freckling in armpits or groin
  • Any skin lumps or bumps
  • Vision changes or eye problems
  • Developmental concerns or learning difficulties
  • Rapid growth, bleeding, or severe pain in any skin lesion (suggests MPNST transformation)

References

Guideline

Evaluation and Management of Isolated Multiple Café au Lait Spots in Infants

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Management and Evaluation of Significant Café au Lait Spots

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

The diagnostic and clinical significance of café-au-lait macules.

Pediatric clinics of North America, 2010

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Related Questions

What is the significance of café au lait (calico-colored) spots?
What size single café (coffee with milk) au lait spot in children is significant?
What is the diagnosis and management for knee pain in a patient with cafe au lait spots?
What is the recommended workup for an infant under one year of age with isolated multiple cafe au lait spots and no other features or significant past medical history?
When are cafe au lait (CAL) spots significant in children?
How should I manage an adult patient with a confirmed pulmonary embolism, including initial therapy based on hemodynamic status, anticoagulation selection, treatment duration, and options for contraindications?
What is the recommended evaluation and management for a patient suspected of having choriocarcinoma?
What is the most useful bedside test to diagnose hepatopulmonary syndrome?
In a 2‑month‑old infant with a brief resolved fever, cough, normal respiratory rate, clear lungs, and good feeding, what is the most likely diagnosis and appropriate management?
How can I calculate LDL cholesterol from total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides using the Friedewald equation?
When should cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim‑sulfamethoxazole) prophylaxis be started in an HIV‑positive individual (CD4 ≤200 cells/µL, pregnancy, infant of an HIV‑positive mother, or risk for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, toxoplasmosis, severe bacterial infection, or malaria), and what are the recommended dosing, duration, monitoring, contraindications, and alternative agents if intolerant?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.