What is the recommended diagnostic workup and management for an adult patient with suspected polycythemia vera?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 18, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Polycythemia Vera: Diagnostic Workup and Management

Diagnostic Workup

Begin with JAK2 V617F mutation testing and serum erythropoietin (EPO) level immediately after confirming sustained hemoglobin elevation (>16.5 g/dL in men, >16.0 g/dL in women), as this combination distinguishes polycythemia vera from secondary causes with >90% specificity. 1, 2

Initial Laboratory Assessment

  • Complete blood count with differential and red cell indices to document erythrocytosis and identify accompanying thrombocytosis (present in 53% of cases) or leukocytosis (49% of cases). 3, 4

  • JAK2 V617F mutation testing is present in >95% of polycythemia vera cases, making it the single most definitive diagnostic test. 1, 3, 5

    • An additional 2-4% of cases harbor JAK2 exon 12 mutations, raising overall molecular sensitivity to 97-99%. 6
  • Serum erythropoietin level interpretation:

    • Low or inappropriately normal EPO has >90% specificity for polycythemia vera. 1, 2
    • However, EPO sensitivity is only 64-70%, so normal EPO does not exclude polycythemia vera. 7, 6
    • Elevated EPO strongly suggests secondary polycythemia and triggers evaluation for hypoxia-driven or tumor-related causes. 7, 2
  • Serum ferritin, iron, and transferrin saturation are mandatory because iron deficiency can mask polycythemia vera by suppressing hemoglobin into the normal range despite active clonal proliferation. 7, 6

Bone Marrow Examination

  • Bone marrow biopsy is the cornerstone of diagnosis when EPO is low or when JAK2 is positive with borderline hemoglobin. 2

  • Characteristic findings include:

    • Hypercellularity with trilineage proliferation (panmyelosis). 1, 2
    • Increased megakaryocytes with cluster formation, giant forms, and pleomorphic morphology. 2
    • Decreased bone marrow iron stores. 2
    • Mild reticulin fibrosis may be present. 2

WHO 2016 Diagnostic Criteria

Diagnosis requires either:

  1. All three major criteria: elevated hemoglobin/hematocrit + JAK2 mutation + characteristic bone marrow morphology, OR
  2. First two major criteria + subnormal serum EPO. 7

Evaluation for Secondary Causes (When EPO is Elevated)

  • Detailed smoking history and carboxyhemoglobin measurement – smoker's polycythemia is the most common secondary cause and resolves with cessation. 7, 2

  • Arterial oxygen saturation and chest imaging to exclude chronic lung disease, right-to-left cardiopulmonary shunts, or sleep apnea. 7, 2

  • Sleep study if obstructive sleep apnea is suspected. 7

  • Abdominal ultrasound or CT to screen for EPO-producing tumors: renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, uterine leiomyomas, pheochromocytoma, meningioma. 7, 2

  • Medication review for exogenous testosterone, anabolic steroids, or erythropoietin administration. 7

  • Renal function testing to evaluate for post-renal transplant erythrocytosis. 7


Risk Stratification

Patients are classified as high-risk if age >60 years OR prior history of thrombosis. 1

  • High-risk patients require cytoreductive therapy in addition to phlebotomy and aspirin. 1
  • Low-risk patients are managed with phlebotomy and aspirin alone. 1

Management

Universal First-Line Therapy (All Patients)

  • Therapeutic phlebotomy to maintain hematocrit <45% reduces thrombotic events and improves survival. 1, 3, 4

  • Low-dose aspirin (100 mg daily) significantly reduces vascular events without significantly increasing major bleeding. 1, 3, 4

  • Aggressive management of cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia) and smoking cessation are mandatory. 1, 4

Cytoreductive Therapy (High-Risk Patients)

High-risk patients should receive cytoreduction with either hydroxyurea or interferon-α at any age. 1

First-Line Cytoreductive Agents

  • Hydroxyurea is the preferred first-line cytoreductive agent for most high-risk patients. 1, 3, 4

    • Use with caution in patients <40 years due to potential leukemogenic risk. 1
    • Dose titrated to maintain platelet count <400 × 10⁹/L and WBC <10 × 10⁹/L. 1
  • Interferon-α (including pegylated formulations) is an alternative first-line agent, particularly in younger patients. 1, 8

    • Induces molecular remissions with reduction in JAK2V617F allele burden. 1, 8
    • Currently undergoing phase III trials. 8
  • Busulfan may be considered in elderly patients (>70 years). 1

Additional Indications for Cytoreductive Therapy (Beyond Age/Thrombosis Risk)

  • Poor tolerance of phlebotomy or frequent phlebotomy requirement. 1
  • Symptomatic or progressive splenomegaly. 1
  • Severe disease-related symptoms (pruritus, constitutional symptoms). 1
  • Platelet count >1,500 × 10⁹/L. 1
  • Progressive leukocytosis. 1

Second-Line Therapy

Ruxolitinib (JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor) is approved for patients with resistance or intolerance to hydroxyurea. 8, 3, 5

  • Effectively alleviates pruritus and decreases splenomegaly. 3
  • Does not reduce thrombotic risk or prevent disease transformation. 8

Criteria for Hydroxyurea Resistance/Intolerance

  1. Need for phlebotomy to keep hematocrit <45% after 3 months of ≥2 g/day hydroxyurea, OR
  2. Uncontrolled myeloproliferation (platelet count >400 × 10⁹/L AND WBC >10 × 10⁹/L) after 3 months of ≥2 g/day, OR
  3. Failure to reduce massive splenomegaly by >50% or relieve splenomegaly symptoms after 3 months of ≥2 g/day, OR
  4. Cytopenias (ANC <1.0 × 10⁹/L OR platelet <100 × 10⁹/L OR hemoglobin <10 g/dL) at lowest effective dose, OR
  5. Unacceptable hydroxyurea-related toxicity (leg ulcers, mucocutaneous manifestations, GI symptoms, pneumonitis, fever). 1

Monitoring Response

Use European LeukemiaNet clinicohematologic criteria to monitor response to cytoreductive therapy. 1

  • Routine monitoring of JAK2V617F allele burden is not indicated except when using interferon-α, which can induce molecular responses. 1

  • Bone marrow monitoring is not indicated for routine clinical follow-up. 1

  • Stable patients: Monitor CBC and cause-specific parameters every 3-6 months. 7

  • Newly diagnosed or unstable patients: Monitor monthly for the first 3 months. 7


Critical Diagnostic Pitfalls

  • Do not exclude polycythemia vera based on normal EPO alone – sensitivity is only 64-70%. 7, 6, 2

  • Do not dismiss polycythemia vera when hemoglobin is normal or borderline-high with microcytosis – iron deficiency can mask the expected hemoglobin rise. 7, 6

    • When microcytosis is present with borderline hemoglobin plus thrombocytosis, leukocytosis, splenomegaly, aquagenic pruritus, or unusual thrombosis, proceed immediately with JAK2 testing. 7, 6
  • Do not perform red cell mass measurements routinely – modern JAK2 testing and EPO levels have largely replaced this costly test. 2

  • Do not overlook smoking as a reversible cause – smoker's polycythemia resolves with cessation, with risk reduction beginning within 1 year. 7, 2


Management Pitfalls

  • Do not perform aggressive or repeated routine phlebotomies in secondary polycythemia – this depletes iron, reduces oxygen-carrying capacity, and paradoxically increases stroke risk. 7

    • In cyanotic heart disease, phlebotomy is indicated only when hemoglobin >20 g/dL and hematocrit >65% with hyperviscosity symptoms after excluding dehydration. 7
  • Do not use cytoreductive drugs in low-risk patients with well-controlled cardiovascular risk factors – phlebotomy and aspirin are sufficient. 1


Prognosis and Complications

  • Median survival from diagnosis ranges from 14.1 to 27.6 years. 3

  • Thrombotic events: Arterial thrombosis occurs in 16% and venous thrombosis in 7% at or before diagnosis, often involving unusual sites (splanchnic veins). 3

  • Disease transformation: 12.7% develop myelofibrosis and 6.8% develop acute myeloid leukemia. 3

  • Bleeding risk is increased, especially with extreme thrombocytosis (≥1,000 × 10⁹/L) due to acquired von Willebrand disease. 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Approach to Polycythemia

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Polycythemia Vera: Rapid Evidence Review.

American family physician, 2021

Research

Polycythaemia vera.

Nature reviews. Disease primers, 2025

Guideline

Duration and Masking Mechanisms of Asymptomatic Polycythemia Vera

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Secondary Polycythemia Diagnosis and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.