Does Aygestin (norethindrone acetate) increase cervical cancer risk in reproductive‑age women?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 18, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Does Aygestin (Norethindrone Acetate) Increase Cervical Cancer Risk?

No, Aygestin (norethindrone acetate) as a progestin-only contraceptive does not appear to increase cervical cancer risk based on current evidence. 1, 2

Key Evidence on Progestin-Only Contraceptives and Cervical Cancer

The distinction between combined hormonal contraceptives (containing both estrogen and progestin) and progestin-only formulations is critical here:

  • Progestin-only contraceptives show no increased cervical cancer risk. The CDC's Medical Eligibility Criteria found that among women with persistent HPV infection, long-term use (≥5 years) of combined hormonal contraceptives may increase risk, but this applies specifically to estrogen-containing products. 1

  • A large South African case-control study of 524 cervical cancer cases found no increased risk with injectable progestogen contraceptives (primarily depot medroxyprogesterone acetate), with an adjusted relative risk of 1.0 (95% CI 0.8-1.3), even with duration extending to ≥15 years. 2

  • Recent Danish cohort data (2021) involving over 20 million person-years showed current or recent users of progestin-only contraception had a relative risk of 0.91 (95% CI 0.78-1.07)—actually suggesting no increased risk and possibly a protective trend. 3

Why Combined Contraceptives Show Different Results

The cervical cancer risk associated with hormonal contraception appears confined to combined estrogen-progestin products:

  • Combined oral contraceptives show a modest duration-dependent increase in cervical cancer risk among HPV-positive women. Current or recent users of combined contraceptives had a relative risk of 1.40 (95% CI 1.28-1.53), translating to approximately 1 extra cervical cancer per 14,700 women using combined contraceptives for 1 year. 3

  • The risk increases with duration of combined contraceptive use: relative risks of 1.1 for <5 years, 1.6 for 5-9 years, and 2.2 for ≥10 years among all women, with similar patterns in HPV-positive women (2.5 for ≥10 years). 4

  • This risk appears to decline after discontinuation, disappearing approximately 10 years after stopping combined contraceptives. 1

Clinical Context: HPV as the Primary Driver

Persistent high-risk HPV infection remains the primary cause of cervical cancer, far outweighing any hormonal influence. 5 The mechanism by which combined contraceptives may increase risk is thought to involve potentiation of HPV oncogenicity in the presence of estrogen, which is absent in progestin-only formulations like Aygestin. 4

Practical Recommendations for Aygestin Users

  • Women using Aygestin should follow standard cervical cancer screening guidelines (beginning at age 25 for average-risk women, or age 21 for those with HIV). 1, 6

  • HPV vaccination and regular screening remain the cornerstone prevention strategies, regardless of contraceptive choice. 5

  • Women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) can use progestin-only contraceptives (Category 2 per CDC criteria), as there is no evidence of worsening outcomes. 1

Important Caveat

The evidence base specifically examining norethindrone acetate (Aygestin) and cervical cancer is limited. Most studies examine depot medroxyprogesterone acetate or do not distinguish between different progestin-only formulations. 7 However, the consistent finding across multiple progestin-only products is reassuring that this class does not increase cervical cancer risk. 3, 2

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.