HCV Testing in Dialysis Patients with Discordant Results
Yes, HCV RNA testing is absolutely necessary in this dialysis patient with a positive card test but negative ELISA. 1
Why HCV RNA Testing is Essential in This Case
Dialysis patients have a uniquely high rate of false-negative antibody tests and occult HCV infection that makes RNA testing mandatory when any screening test is positive. 1, 2
Critical Evidence from Dialysis Populations
- Up to 28% of hemodialysis patients who are HCV antibody-negative have detectable HCV RNA by PCR, representing true active infection that would be missed by antibody testing alone 2
- In dialysis units with high HCV prevalence, initial testing with nucleic acid testing (NAT) should be considered rather than relying on antibody assays 1
- The immunosuppressed state of dialysis patients creates a prolonged window period where HCV RNA is positive but antibodies remain negative or equivocal 3, 4
KDIGO 2022 Guideline Recommendations
The most authoritative guidance comes from the KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline, which provides two acceptable screening strategies for dialysis patients 1:
- NAT (HCV RNA) alone (Grade 1A recommendation)
- Immunoassay followed by NAT if immunoassay is positive (Grade 1A recommendation)
Your patient falls into the second category—any positive screening test (including the card test) mandates confirmatory HCV RNA testing. 1
Understanding the Discordant Results
The positive card test followed by negative ELISA creates diagnostic uncertainty that can only be resolved by RNA testing 1:
- Different antibody assays use different antigens and platforms, so discordant results between tests are not uncommon 5, 6
- The card test may have detected early antibody formation that the ELISA missed, or vice versa 1, 4
- False-negative ELISA results occur in 10% of dialysis patients with active HCV infection due to immunosuppression, uremia, or technical factors 1, 2
Practical Testing Protocol
Draw blood for HCV RNA testing BEFORE the dialysis session, as hemodialysis reduces viremia levels and can produce falsely low or negative results 1:
- Use a quantitative HCV RNA assay with a detection limit ≤25 IU/mL 1
- If HCV RNA is positive, proceed with genotype testing and liver disease staging 7
- If HCV RNA is negative, repeat testing in 3 months given the discordant antibody results and ongoing dialysis exposure risk 1
High-Risk Context of Dialysis
This patient requires RNA testing because dialysis patients represent a uniquely high-risk population 1:
- HCV prevalence in hemodialysis patients is significantly higher than the general population 1
- Patient-to-patient transmission occurs repeatedly in dialysis centers despite infection control measures 1
- Any new HCV infection must be reported to public health authorities and triggers facility-wide screening 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never rely on a single antibody test (positive or negative) to diagnose or exclude HCV in dialysis patients 1, 2
- Do not assume a negative ELISA rules out infection when another screening test is positive 1, 2
- Do not delay RNA testing while repeating antibody assays—proceed directly to molecular testing 1, 3
- Remember that antibody tests cannot distinguish active infection from resolved infection—only HCV RNA confirms current viremia 1, 5
Alternative: HCV Core Antigen Testing
If HCV RNA testing is unavailable or cost-prohibitive, HCV core antigen assay is an acceptable alternative with 84-89% sensitivity and specificity in dialysis populations 8, 4, 9:
- Core antigen testing is less expensive than PCR but more sensitive than antibody testing alone 8
- It can detect infection during the window period when antibodies are absent 4, 9
- However, it has a higher detection threshold (150-3000 IU/mL) than RNA testing and may miss low-level viremia 1
The definitive answer: Proceed immediately with HCV RNA testing drawn before dialysis to confirm or exclude active infection in this patient with discordant antibody results. 1