When and how should a central venous catheter be placed using an anatomic landmark technique without ultrasound guidance?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 20, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Central Venous Catheter Placement Without Ultrasound

Landmark-based central venous catheter placement should only be performed when ultrasound is truly unavailable—such as in emergencies, equipment failure, or resource-limited settings—because ultrasound guidance reduces complications by 70% and improves success rates. 1

When Landmark Technique Is Justified

The landmark approach is reserved for specific scenarios where ultrasound cannot be used:

  • Emergency situations where ultrasound devices are not immediately accessible 2
  • Equipment unavailability, reported by 28% of intensivists as a barrier to routine ultrasound use 2
  • Resource-limited settings lacking ultrasound equipment 2
  • Extensive subcutaneous emphysema that prevents adequate ultrasound visualization 1

Clinicians must maintain landmark skills for these rare situations, even though ultrasound is now standard of care. 1, 2

Site Selection for Landmark Technique

Internal Jugular Vein (Preferred)

The internal jugular vein should be the primary target vessel when performing landmark-based catheterization because it has lower complication rates compared to subclavian access. 3

Anatomical approach:

  • Identify the triangle formed by the two heads of the sternocleidomastoid muscle and the clavicle 2
  • Palpate the carotid artery; the internal jugular vein lies lateral to it 2
  • In 2008,50% of UK anesthesiologists used surface landmarks and 30% relied on carotid artery palpation for IJV cannulation 2

Subclavian Vein (Higher Risk)

Subclavian access carries significantly higher risk of pneumothorax and should be avoided when possible without ultrasound. 2, 3

Technique:

  • Locate the junction of the middle and medial thirds of the clavicle 2
  • Insert the needle approximately 1 cm below the clavicle 2
  • Subclavian approach resulted in 29.2% overall complications versus 17.7% for other sites 3
  • Arterial puncture occurred in 8% of subclavian attempts versus 1.6% at other sites 3

Femoral Vein (Emergency Alternative)

The femoral site is acceptable when internal jugular or subclavian access is not feasible, though it carries higher infection and thrombosis risk. 1, 2

Critical Limitations and Risks

Landmark techniques cannot detect anatomic variations or venous thrombosis, both of which occur frequently and substantially increase complication risk. 1, 2

Complication Rates Without Ultrasound

  • Total complications: 13.5% with landmark versus 4.0% with ultrasound for internal jugular access 1
  • Arterial puncture: 7.2% without ultrasound versus 2.1% with ultrasound 3
  • Overall procedural complications: 19.5% in landmark-based series 3
  • Mechanical complications (pneumothorax, hemothorax) occur more frequently with landmark technique 2

Operator Experience Matters Critically

Operators with fewer than 25 previous insertions cause significantly more complications (25.2% versus 13.6% for experienced operators). 3

  • Inexperienced operators combined with subclavian approach are significant predictors for increased complications 3
  • Close supervision reduces complication rates from 23.8% to 10.7% 3

Procedural Approach When Ultrasound Is Unavailable

Pre-Procedure Assessment

  • Verify there are no alternative options for ultrasound availability 1
  • Select internal jugular vein as first choice unless contraindicated 3
  • Ensure adequate supervision if operator has <25 prior insertions 3

Technique Principles

  • Use strict aseptic technique with maximum barrier precautions 1
  • Limit attempts: switch to another operator before complications occur rather than persisting 4
  • Avoid rapid "searching" movements with the needle 1
  • Maintain awareness of needle direction and depth at all times 1

Post-Procedure Verification

Chest radiography is mandatory after landmark-based insertion to confirm tip position and rule out pneumothorax. 1, 5

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume anatomic landmarks are reliable—variations occur in a substantial proportion of patients 1, 2
  • Do not persist with multiple attempts—switch operators or sites early 4
  • Do not use subclavian approach in patients with potential dialysis needs—it causes central venous stenosis 6
  • Do not skip post-procedure chest X-ray—complications may not be immediately apparent 5

The De-Skilling Concern

Thirteen percent of intensivists express concern about losing landmark proficiency due to predominant ultrasound use. 2 This creates a paradox: landmark skills must be maintained for emergencies, yet routine ultrasound use means fewer opportunities to practice landmark techniques. The solution is simulation-based training and periodic skill maintenance, not routine use of an inferior technique. 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Landmark Central Venous Catheter Placement When Ultrasound Is Unavailable

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

[How to improve central venous catheter use in intensive care unit?].

Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation, 2006

Guideline

Brachiocephalic Vein Access for Neurointerventional Procedures – Evidence‑Based Recommendations

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Central Venous Catheter Placement in Cardiac Surgery

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.