What are the anatomic and clinical classifications of diverticulitis?

Types of Diverticulitis

Primary Classification Framework

The World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) classification system divides acute diverticulitis into two fundamental categories—uncomplicated and complicated—with complicated disease further stratified into stages 1A through 4 based on CT imaging findings. 1, 2

This CT-guided classification has become the international standard because it directly links anatomic findings to specific management decisions and provides a universal language for clinicians managing acute diverticulitis in emergency settings. 1, 2

---

Uncomplicated Diverticulitis (Stage 0)

Uncomplicated diverticulitis is defined by inflammation confined to the colon wall and immediate pericolic tissue, without extension beyond the colon itself. 1, 2

CT Imaging Findings:

• Presence of diverticula 1, 2
• Bowel wall thickening 1, 2
• Increased density of pericolic fat (fat stranding) 1, 2
• Absence of abscess, perforation, free gas, or distant complications 1, 2

Clinical Significance:

• Represents approximately 85% of acute diverticulitis cases 3
• Can be managed as outpatient in immunocompetent patients without comorbidities 2, 4
• Antibiotics are not routinely required for this stage 2, 3

---

Complicated Diverticulitis (Stages 1A–4)

Complicated diverticulitis occurs when the infectious or inflammatory process extends beyond the colon, requiring progressively more aggressive intervention as stage severity increases. 1, 2

Stage 1A: Pericolic Micro-perforation

• CT Findings: Pericolic air bubbles or small fluid collection ≤5 cm from the inflamed bowel segment 1, 2
• Management: IV broad-spectrum antibiotics covering gram-negative and anaerobic organisms; close monitoring; no percutaneous drainage required 1, 2

Stage 1B: Small Pericolic Abscess

• CT Findings: Abscess ≤4 cm in diameter 1, 2
• Management: IV antibiotics alone for 7 days; hospital admission recommended; drainage generally not needed 1, 2, 4

Stage 2A: Large Pericolic Abscess

• CT Findings: Abscess >4 cm in diameter 1, 2
• Management: IV antibiotics plus percutaneous CT-guided drainage; continue antibiotics for 4 days if source control is adequate in immunocompetent patients, extending to 7 days for immunocompromised individuals 1, 2, 4

Stage 2B: Distant Free Gas

• CT Findings: Free intraperitoneal gas located >5 cm from the inflamed bowel segment 1, 2
• Management: IV antibiotics immediately; urgent surgical consultation mandatory; consider percutaneous drainage if accessible abscess present 1, 2
• Critical Caveat: Non-operative management fails in 57–60% of cases when large volumes of distant free air are present 2

Stage 3: Diffuse Fluid Without Distant Free Gas

• CT Findings: Diffuse intra-abdominal fluid without distant free gas (purulent peritonitis) 1, 2
• Management: IV antibiotics; percutaneous drainage if abscess identified; surgical consultation advised 1, 2

Stage 4: Generalized Peritonitis

• CT Findings: Diffuse fluid with distant free gas (fecal or purulent peritonitis) 1, 2
• Management: IV antibiotics and urgent surgical intervention; laparoscopic approach preferred when feasible 1, 2
• Mortality Risk: Postoperative mortality for emergent colon resection is 10.6% compared to 0.5% for elective procedures 3

---

Alternative Classification Systems

While the WSES classification is recommended for contemporary practice, clinicians should be aware of historical systems still referenced in the literature:

Modified Hinchey Classification

• Stage 0: Mild clinical diverticulitis 1, 4
• Stage 1a: Confined pericolic inflammation 1
• Stage 1b: Confined pericolic abscess 1
• Stage 2: Pelvic or distant intra-abdominal abscess 1
• Stage 3: Generalized purulent peritonitis 1
• Stage 4: Fecal peritonitis 1

This classification was the international standard for three decades but has been largely superseded by the WSES system, which provides more granular CT-based staging. 1

Sallinen Classification

This system incorporates clinical, radiologic, and physiologic parameters including organ dysfunction, demonstrating superior predictive ability for mortality and need for surgery compared to purely anatomic classifications. 4 However, it is less widely adopted in emergency practice than the WSES system.

---

Critical Diagnostic Considerations

Contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis is mandatory for all patients with suspected acute diverticulitis, because clinical examination alone has only a 65% positive predictive value and misdiagnoses the condition in 34–68% of patients. 2, 5

When CT Can Be Omitted:

• Only in patients with a prior CT-confirmed episode who present with mild, recurrent symptoms matching their previous attacks 2

Laméris Criteria (High-Specificity Clinical Rule):

When all three criteria are present, they achieve 97% positive predictive value: 2, 5

1. Left lower quadrant tenderness only
2. CRP >50 mg/L
3. Absence of vomiting

However, this combination occurs in only 24% of patients, so imaging remains necessary in most emergency presentations. 2

---

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

• Pericolonic lymphadenopathy >1 cm on CT should raise suspicion for colonic carcinoma masquerading as diverticulitis and warrants colonoscopy after acute inflammation resolves 2
• Approximately 5% of patients with severe diverticulitis present without fever or leukocytosis, so absence of systemic signs does not exclude complicated disease 5
• In premenopausal women with pelvic pressure pain, obtain β-hCG and consider pelvic ultrasound to exclude gynecologic emergencies (ovarian torsion, tubo-ovarian abscess, ectopic pregnancy) before attributing symptoms to diverticulitis 2

---

Red Flags Predicting Progression to Complicated Disease

The following clinical features indicate higher risk of progression from uncomplicated to complicated diverticulitis and warrant closer monitoring or earlier imaging: 5

• Symptoms lasting >5 days
• Pain score ≥8 on visual analog scale
• Vomiting
• CRP >140 mg/L
• Age <50 years