When is the β‑D‑glucan assay indicated and how should its results be interpreted in a patient with suspected invasive fungal infection?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 24, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

β-D-Glucan Testing: Indications and Interpretation

When to Order β-D-Glucan Testing

Serial β-D-glucan testing (twice weekly) should be reserved for high-risk immunocompromised patients, specifically those with hematologic malignancies, allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients, or prolonged profound neutropenia. 1

Specific High-Risk Populations

  • Acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy 1
  • Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients during neutropenic periods 1
  • Persistently febrile neutropenic patients despite 4+ days of broad-spectrum antibiotics 2, 1
  • Neonates with suspected invasive candidiasis when blood cultures are negative or delayed 1
  • ICU patients with multiple risk factors (central venous catheter, broad-spectrum antibiotics, parenteral nutrition, dialysis, recent surgery, pancreatitis) and clinical suspicion for invasive fungal infection 2, 3

When NOT to Order

  • Do not order in low-risk patients without significant immunosuppression 1
  • Do not use for routine screening in general ICU populations due to poor specificity 2
  • Not recommended to guide pediatric clinical decision-making (mean levels higher in uninfected children, optimal thresholds not established) 3
  • Avoid routine surveillance in lung transplant recipients (specificity as low as 9%, positive predictive value only 14%) 3

Interpreting Positive Results (>80 pg/mL)

A single positive β-D-glucan result should NOT trigger immediate antifungal therapy; instead, obtain repeat testing within 3-5 days combined with comprehensive evaluation for confounding factors and additional diagnostic workup. 3, 1

What a Positive Result Means

  • Indicates probable invasive fungal infection but is NOT species-specific 2, 1
  • Detects Candida, Aspergillus, Pneumocystis jirovecii, and Fusarium species 2, 1
  • Does NOT detect Mucormycosis (zygomycetes) or most Cryptococcus species 3, 1
  • Sensitivity: 75-80% for invasive candidiasis, approximately 80% for aspergillosis 2, 4
  • Specificity: approximately 80%, but significantly lower in ICU patients 2

Critical False-Positive Causes (Must Exclude Before Treatment)

  • Beta-lactam antibiotics: piperacillin-tazobactam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefepime, ceftriaxone, carbapenems, ampicillin-sulbactam 3, 1, 5
  • Hemodialysis (especially with cellulose membranes) 2, 3, 1
  • Albumin or intravenous immunoglobulin administration 2, 3, 1
  • Gram-positive or gram-negative bacteremia 3, 5
  • Exposure to surgical gauze or glucan-containing materials 3, 1
  • Gastrointestinal mucositis or mucosal disruption 3
  • Fungal colonization without invasive disease 3

Immediate Diagnostic Actions

  • Obtain at least two sets of blood cultures from different sites 3, 1
  • Repeat β-D-glucan testing within 3-5 days (consecutive positive results significantly improve specificity to >96%) 2, 3, 6
  • Perform serum galactomannan if aspergillosis suspected 3
  • Obtain high-resolution chest CT if pulmonary symptoms present 3, 1
  • Culture site-specific specimens from normally sterile sites when clinically indicated 3

Interpreting Negative Results (<80 pg/mL)

A negative β-D-glucan has high negative predictive value (>90%) and effectively rules out invasive fungal infection in appropriate clinical contexts. 2, 1

Important Caveats for Negative Results

  • Does not exclude invasive aspergillosis in patients already receiving mold-active antifungal prophylaxis 1
  • Sensitivity may be reduced by concurrent antifungal therapy 2, 3
  • Serial negative results in high-risk patients support withholding empiric antifungal therapy 1

Treatment Decision Algorithm

DO NOT Start Antifungals Based On:

  • Single positive β-D-glucan result without supporting clinical evidence 3, 5
  • Positive result in presence of known false-positive causes (beta-lactams, hemodialysis, etc.) 3, 5
  • Respiratory secretions or colonization alone 1

START Empiric Antifungal Therapy When:

Two consecutive positive β-D-glucan results (>80 pg/mL) PLUS high-risk clinical features PLUS signs of sepsis unresponsive to antibiotics. 3, 5

Specific Treatment Triggers

  • Positive blood culture for Candida species (even single positive culture requires treatment) 5
  • Radiographic findings suggestive of invasive fungal infection (halo sign, nodular lesions) plus positive β-D-glucan 3, 5
  • Critically ill patient with septic shock and high clinical suspicion for invasive candidiasis 3
  • Neutropenic patient with persistent fever despite broad-spectrum antibiotics and high-risk features 3
  • Clinical deterioration with imaging findings suggestive of invasive fungal infection 3

First-Line Antifungal Regimens

For Suspected Invasive Candidiasis

Non-neutropenic critically ill patients: Echinocandin (preferred) 1, 5

  • Caspofungin: 70 mg loading dose, then 50 mg daily 3, 5
  • Micafungin: 100 mg daily 3, 5
  • Anidulafungin: 200 mg loading dose, then 100 mg daily 3, 5

Neutropenic patients: Echinocandin OR liposomal amphotericin B (3-5 mg/kg daily) 1, 5

For Suspected Invasive Aspergillosis (with concurrent positive galactomannan)

  • Voriconazole or isavuconazole (first-line) 1
  • Liposomal amphotericin B (alternative) 1

Treatment Duration and Monitoring

  • Documented candidemia: Minimum 14 days after first negative blood culture AND resolution of clinical symptoms 1, 5
  • Mandatory ophthalmologic examination to rule out endophthalmitis in all candidemia cases 1, 5
  • Source control is crucial: remove infected catheters, drain abscesses 1
  • Decreasing β-D-glucan levels may correlate with response to antifungal therapy 2

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not ignore beta-lactam antibiotics as a cause of false positivity - this is the most common overlooked confounding factor in ICU patients 3, 5
  • Do not use β-D-glucan results from respiratory secretions - only serum testing is validated 1
  • Do not rely on single positive result - require consecutive positivity for treatment decisions unless patient is critically ill 3, 6
  • Remember the test cannot differentiate between fungal pathogens - clinical context and additional testing (galactomannan, cultures) are essential 2, 1
  • Do not order in lung transplant recipients for routine surveillance - 90% have at least one positive result, making it unreliable 3

References

Guideline

Serum (1→3)-β‑D‑Glucan Testing: Indications, Interpretation, and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Approach to Indeterminate Beta-D-Glucan Results

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Positive Beta-D-Glucan in Patients on Cefepime

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Related Questions

What antifungal therapy is recommended for a patient with a positive beta-D-glucan test on cefepime?
When should serum (1→3)-β-D-glucan be ordered, what is the diagnostic cutoff, how are positive and negative results interpreted, and how should the results guide antifungal therapy?
What is the appropriate treatment for a patient with a positive beta-D-glucan (BDG) test indicating a potential invasive fungal infection?
What is the best course of treatment for a patient with eosinophilia, a positive galactomannan (GM) test, and bowel wall thickening, suggestive of invasive aspergillosis?
Is a Fungitell assay necessary with a positive tissue culture for Candida?
In an otherwise healthy infant with uncomplicated colic and no cow‑milk protein allergy, does feeding an extensively hydrolyzed formula (eHF) cause any harm?
What is a step‑by‑step flow chart for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults, including diagnosis confirmation, lifestyle modification, metformin initiation, individualized second‑line therapy based on comorbidities, and escalation to insulin?
I am taking aripiprazole and oxcarbazepine and switching my antidepressant from fluoxetine to fluvoxamine; do I need to adjust the aripiprazole dose?
How should I manage a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease, selecting glucose‑lowering agents based on estimated glomerular filtration rate and the presence of albuminuria, heart failure, or cardiovascular disease?
What is the appropriate work‑up for a patient presenting with a headache?
What is the appropriate management and antibiotic regimen for an adult male with an uncomplicated urinary tract infection?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.