Persistent Positive Dengue IgM Without IgG Seroconversion After One Month
This serological pattern—positive dengue IgM at presentation and again one month later without IgG seroconversion—most likely indicates a false-positive IgM result due to cross-reactivity with another flavivirus or non-specific reactivity, rather than true dengue infection. 1
Understanding the Expected Antibody Timeline
In genuine dengue infections, the antibody response follows a predictable pattern:
- Primary dengue infection: IgM appears 3-5 days after symptom onset, while IgG develops around day 5-7 and persists for months to years 1
- By one month post-infection, IgG antibodies should be robustly positive in all true dengue cases, as IgG is produced after 10-12 days and becomes a lifetime marker 2
- The absence of IgG seroconversion after 30 days essentially rules out acute dengue infection 1, 3
Why This Pattern Suggests False-Positive IgM
The failure to develop IgG antibodies over a month-long period is incompatible with true dengue infection. Several mechanisms explain persistent false-positive IgM:
- Cross-reactivity with other flaviviruses: IgM antibodies can cross-react with dengue assays following infection or vaccination with yellow fever, Japanese encephalitis, Zika, West Nile, or tick-borne encephalitis viruses 1, 4
- Non-specific reactivity: IgM assays can produce false positives in the absence of any flavivirus infection, particularly in low-prevalence settings 1
- Persistent IgM from remote infection: While dengue IgM can persist for 2-3 months after initial infection 4, this scenario would still show positive IgG, which is absent in your patient 1
Recommended Diagnostic Approach
Perform plaque reduction neutralization testing (PRNT) against dengue and other endemic flaviviruses to definitively resolve this discordant result. 1, 4
- PRNT is the reference standard for specificity and can distinguish true dengue infection from cross-reactive antibodies 1, 2
- A PRNT titer ≥10 for dengue with titers <10 for other flaviviruses would confirm dengue; conversely, higher titers against another flavivirus would identify the true infecting agent 1, 5
- Document complete vaccination history for all flavivirus vaccines, as prior immunization is a common cause of false-positive IgM 4
Clinical Interpretation Algorithm
If PRNT is unavailable, report this as "indeterminate for dengue infection" and consider alternative diagnoses:
- The negative Ross River virus IgG makes recent Ross River infection unlikely, though acute-phase testing (IgM) would be more informative
- Consider testing for other endemic flaviviruses based on exposure history 1
- If the patient was symptomatic at initial presentation, retrospective NS1 antigen or NAAT testing on stored acute-phase serum (if available) would be definitive, as these tests detect active viral replication 1, 4
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not assume acute dengue infection based on positive IgM alone, especially when IgG fails to develop 1, 4
- Do not repeat the same IgM assay expecting different results; the persistent positivity reflects assay characteristics, not evolving infection 1
- In areas with multiple circulating flaviviruses, integrate epidemiologic data about local virus circulation when interpreting results 1, 5
Secondary Dengue Infection Consideration
Secondary dengue infection does not explain this pattern. While IgM levels can be diminished or undetectable in secondary infections (absent in 28% of cases), IgG would be strongly positive from day 4-6 onward and detectable in all cases by day 12 6, 3. Your patient's negative IgG at one month excludes both primary and secondary dengue infection 3.