What is the guideline‑directed medical therapy for an adult with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and a left‑ventricular ejection fraction of 43%?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 27, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Heart Failure with Ejection Fraction 43%

A patient with LVEF 43% has heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and should receive the identical four-pillar guideline-directed medical therapy used for HFrEF—specifically, simultaneous initiation of an ARNI (or ACE-inhibitor), beta-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and SGLT2 inhibitor—because this EF category follows a dynamic trajectory and shares the same therapeutic responsiveness as HFrEF. 1, 2

Classification and Rationale

  • LVEF 43% falls into the HFmrEF category (LVEF 41–49%), which the 2022 ACC/AHA guidelines explicitly state warrants the same therapeutic approach as HFrEF (LVEF ≤40%). 1

  • HFmrEF represents a dynamic state—approximately 27% of patients decline to HFrEF (LVEF ≤40%) while 45% improve to HFpEF (LVEF ≥50%) over time, making serial LVEF monitoring essential every 6–12 months. 2, 3

  • Post-hoc analyses and subgroup data demonstrate that medications proven effective in HFrEF also reduce cardiovascular mortality and HF hospitalization in the mildly reduced EF range. 2, 3

Four-Pillar Pharmacologic Therapy (Initiate All Simultaneously)

1. Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI)

  • Start sacubitril/valsartan 24/26 mg or 49/51 mg twice daily as first-line RAAS inhibition; post-hoc analyses show superior reduction in HF hospitalization and mortality even in the mildly reduced EF range compared with ACE-inhibitors. 2, 4

  • Titrate to the target dose of 97/103 mg twice daily over 3–6 weeks while monitoring blood pressure, renal function, and potassium. 2, 4

  • If ARNI is unavailable or unaffordable, substitute an ACE-inhibitor (enalapril 10–20 mg twice daily or lisinopril 20–40 mg once daily) and titrate to at least 50% of the evidence-based target dose. 2

  • ARBs are reserved only for patients who develop intolerable cough with ACE-inhibitors, as the evidence base for mortality reduction is stronger for ACE-inhibitors and ARNIs. 2

2. Beta-Blocker

  • Initiate a guideline-recommended beta-blocker (carvedilol 3.125 mg twice daily, metoprolol succinate 12.5–25 mg daily, or bisoprolol 1.25 mg daily) concurrently with ARNI; beta-blockers confer mortality benefit in all patients with LVEF <50% regardless of symptom status. 2, 4

  • Titrate every 1–2 weeks toward target doses: carvedilol 25–50 mg twice daily, metoprolol succinate 200 mg daily, or bisoprolol 10 mg daily, aiming for a resting heart rate of 50–60 bpm. 2, 4

  • Use a "start-low, go-slow" approach while monitoring heart rate, blood pressure, and clinical status after each dose increase. 2

3. Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist (MRA)

  • Add spironolactone 12.5–25 mg daily (or eplerenone 25 mg daily) for patients with LVEF ≤35% after initial therapy, provided eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m² and serum potassium ≤5.0 mmol/L. 2, 4

  • For LVEF 41–49%, MRA initiation is reasonable (Class IIa) if the patient has persistent NYHA class II–IV symptoms despite ARNI and beta-blocker therapy. 2

  • Check potassium and creatinine at 3 days, 1 week, then monthly for three months to detect hyperkalemia; contraindicated if eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m² or K⁺ >5.0 mmol/L. 2, 4

4. SGLT2 Inhibitor

  • Prescribe dapagliflozin 10 mg daily or empagliflozin 10 mg daily irrespective of diabetes status; this class reduces cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization across the full spectrum of reduced and mildly reduced EF. 2, 4

  • SGLT2 inhibitors carry a Class I, Level A recommendation and should be started at full dose immediately with minimal blood-pressure effects. 2, 4

Monitoring Strategy

  • Schedule clinical follow-up every 3–6 months initially to assess symptom emergence, medication tolerance, blood pressure, renal function, and serum potassium. 2

  • Repeat transthoracic echocardiography every 6–12 months to track LVEF trajectory and identify either improvement (HFimpEF, LVEF >40%) or progression to HFrEF (LVEF ≤40%). 2, 5

  • Continue full GDMT even if LVEF improves above 40% (HFimpEF); abrupt discontinuation is associated with relapse of LV dysfunction and clinical HF (ACC/AHA Class I, Level A). 2, 4

  • Measure natriuretic peptides (BNP or NT-proBNP) to support the diagnosis and provide prognostic information, recognizing that normal levels do not rule out HFmrEF. 2, 5

Device Therapy Considerations

  • Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is not routinely indicated in patients with LVEF 41–49% because primary-prevention trials enrolled patients with LVEF ≤35% (ACC/AHA Class III, Harm). 2

  • Re-evaluate LVEF after 3–6 months of optimal medical therapy; if EF declines to ≤35% and the patient meets standard ICD criteria (≥40 days post-MI for ischemic disease or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with expected survival >1 year), primary-prevention ICD becomes indicated. 2

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is not indicated unless LVEF falls to ≤35% together with left-bundle-branch block (QRS ≥150 ms) and sinus rhythm. 2

Additional Pharmacologic Considerations

  • Loop diuretics (furosemide, torsemide, or bumetanide) should be used to relieve congestion, titrating to the lowest dose that maintains euvolemia; diuretics do not confer mortality benefit. 4, 5

  • Ivabradine (starting at 2.5–5 mg twice daily) should be considered for patients in sinus rhythm with heart rate ≥70 bpm despite maximally tolerated beta-blocker therapy. 4

  • Hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate combination provides additional benefit in self-identified African-American patients with NYHA class III–IV symptoms despite optimal therapy. 4

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not postpone GDMT awaiting symptom development; early treatment in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic LV dysfunction reduces mortality and prevents progression to overt HF (ACC/AHA Class I, Level A). 2

  • Avoid reliance on a single LVEF measurement for definitive therapeutic decisions; confirm with repeat imaging to prevent misclassification due to measurement variability. 2, 5

  • Never discontinue GDMT when LVEF improves above 40%; maintain therapy to prevent relapse of ventricular dysfunction and clinical HF. 2, 4

  • Do not combine ACE-inhibitors with ARBs or with sacubitril/valsartan, because dual RAAS blockade increases adverse events without additional benefit (ACC/AHA Class III, Harm). 4

Up-Titration Algorithm

  • Increase one medication at a time every 1–2 weeks, selecting the class most likely to be tolerated based on hemodynamics. 4

  • If heart rate >70 bpm, prioritize beta-blocker up-titration to target doses. 4

  • If systolic blood pressure >100 mmHg, up-titrate ARNI/ACE-inhibitor toward target doses. 4

  • If serum potassium <4.5 mmol/L and renal function is stable, up-titrate MRA toward target doses. 4

  • Before each dose increase, re-measure blood pressure and heart rate; after each MRA or ARNI/ACE-inhibitor increase, re-check potassium and creatinine 1–2 weeks later. 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Guideline‑Directed Management of Asymptomatic Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction (LVEF 41‑49%)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Evidence‑Based Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure by Ejection‑Fraction

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Related Questions

Is an ejection fraction of 45%–50% classified as heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)?
What is the guideline‑directed management for a patient with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%) who has stable blood pressure, including initial medication choices, dosing, titration, and adjunctive therapies?
What is the guideline‑based approach to diagnosing and managing heart failure, including classification into reduced and preserved ejection fraction and the recommended pharmacologic and device therapies?
Is an ejection fraction (EF) of 55-60 percent considered normal?
How is heart failure classified based on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)?
According to KDOQI guidelines, how should antibiotics be administered for a peritoneal dialysis patient with a Pseudomonas exit‑site infection?
What is the recommended initial management for a trauma patient presenting with hypovolemic (hemorrhagic) shock?
What is the recommended norepinephrine (Norad) infusion dose, titration, line selection, and monitoring for an adult with hypotensive shock after fluid resuscitation to achieve a target mean arterial pressure of ≥65 mmHg?
For an adult patient with a tunneled cuffed dialysis catheter exit‑site infection caused by Pseudomonas, how does KDOQI recommend administering systemic anti‑pseudomonal antibiotics (choice, dosing, route, and duration)?
What cefepime dose should be given to a hemodialysis patient with a catheter exit‑site infection caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa?
What IV fluids should be started for an adult patient who is nil per os awaiting surgery, with no fluid restriction, normal electrolytes, and no cardiac or renal failure?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.