What is the cardiac murmur grading system and how are the grades I through VI defined?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 27, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Cardiac Murmur Grading System

The Standard Grading Scale

Cardiac murmurs are graded on a 1-through-6 intensity scale for systolic murmurs, with each grade representing progressively louder sounds that help distinguish innocent from pathological murmurs. 1

The Six Grades Defined

  • Grade 1/6: Very faint murmur, barely audible even with optimal listening conditions 2

  • Grade 2/6: Soft murmur but readily heard with the stethoscope on the chest 2

  • Grade 3/6: Moderately loud murmur without a palpable thrill; this grade represents a critical threshold where echocardiography becomes necessary as the murmur is more likely to represent organic heart disease 1, 2

  • Grade 4/6: Loud murmur with an associated palpable thrill (vibration felt on the chest wall) 2

  • Grade 5/6: Very loud murmur that can be heard with the stethoscope barely touching the chest, with palpable thrill 2

  • Grade 6/6: Extremely loud murmur that can be heard with the stethoscope held just off the chest wall, with palpable thrill 2

Alternative Grading for Diastolic Murmurs

  • Diastolic murmurs are typically graded on a simpler 4-point scale (Grade 1 being very faint, Grade 4 being very loud), though this distinction is less clinically relevant since all diastolic murmurs, regardless of grade, virtually always represent pathological conditions and require immediate echocardiographic evaluation 2, 3

Clinical Significance by Grade

Low-Grade Murmurs (1-2/6)

  • Grade 1-2 systolic murmurs in asymptomatic adults with normal S2 splitting, no other abnormal cardiac findings, and normal ECG/chest X-ray are typically innocent and require no further workup 2

  • However, even soft grade 1-2 murmurs require echocardiography when accompanied by symptoms (syncope, angina, heart failure, thromboembolism), signs of endocarditis, or abnormal physical findings 2

High-Grade Murmurs (≥3/6)

  • Any midsystolic murmur of grade 3 or greater intensity mandates echocardiographic evaluation, as these are more likely to represent organic valvular disease rather than innocent flow murmurs 1, 2

  • Historical data from Freeman and Levine's landmark 1933 study demonstrated that all patients with grade 3 or 4 murmurs had either organic heart disease or anemia, establishing this threshold as clinically significant 4

Critical Timing and Type Considerations

Murmurs Requiring Evaluation Regardless of Grade

  • All holosystolic (pansystolic) murmurs require echocardiography regardless of intensity, as they indicate flow between chambers with widely different pressures throughout systole (e.g., mitral regurgitation, ventricular septal defect) 2, 3

  • All late systolic murmurs at the apex or left sternal border require echocardiography regardless of grade 2

  • All diastolic murmurs require immediate cardiac evaluation regardless of intensity—this is a non-negotiable rule 1, 2, 3

  • All continuous murmurs require evaluation except for the clearly innocent venous hums and mammary souffles 1

Complete Assessment Beyond Intensity

The grading system is only one component of murmur assessment. Complete characterization requires documenting: 1

  • Timing: Systolic (holosystolic, midsystolic, early, late), diastolic (early, mid, presystolic), or continuous 1

  • Configuration: Crescendo, decrescendo, crescendo-decrescendo (diamond-shaped), or plateau 1

  • Location: Primary auscultation site (apex, left lower sternal border, right upper sternal border, etc.) 2

  • Radiation: To carotids, axilla, back, or other distant sites 2

  • Pitch: High, medium, or low frequency 2

  • Response to dynamic maneuvers: Changes with respiration, Valsalva, standing, squatting, handgrip exercise 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never dismiss a diastolic murmur based on low grade—even a grade 1 diastolic murmur represents pathology and requires echocardiography 2, 3

  • Do not assume grade 1-2 systolic murmurs are innocent in elderly patients with hypertension, as these may represent sclerotic aortic valve leaflets or flow into noncompliant vessels 2

  • Avoid overlooking holosystolic or late systolic murmurs even when soft, as these indicate regurgitant lesions requiring evaluation 3

  • Remember that symptoms override murmur characteristics—any murmur accompanied by syncope, angina, heart failure, or thromboembolism requires echocardiography regardless of grade 2, 3

  • Be aware that echocardiography may detect trivial physiological regurgitation in normal patients who have no audible murmur at all, so correlation with clinical findings is essential 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Evaluation of Systolic Murmurs

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Characterization of Heart Murmurs

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Samuel A. Levine and the history of grading systolic murmurs.

The American journal of cardiology, 2008

Related Questions

What are the grades of heart murmurs?
What is the standard method for grading heart murmurs?
How are heart murmurs graded?
How is the grading of a murmur done?
How do you determine the location of a heart murmur?
In a 66‑year‑old woman taking rosuvastatin 5 mg daily, with total cholesterol 139 mg/dL, LDL‑cholesterol 64 mg/dL, HDL‑cholesterol 48 mg/dL, and triglycerides 208 mg/dL, is any change in therapy needed?
In a patient with a left‑sided deep neck abscess (suprahyoid and infrahyoid, 1.7 × 1.6 × 4.2 cm, posterior to the left carotid space, with surrounding inflammation and prevertebral fluid at C4–C5, no airway compromise, managed non‑surgically by ENT) who has received intravenous vancomycin and ampicillin‑sulbactam for three days and intravenous steroids for two days and remains febrile with leukocytosis, how many additional days of intravenous antibiotics are recommended and when can the patient be safely transitioned to oral therapy?
What is the likely diagnosis and first‑line management for a 24‑year‑old woman with hard stools, pain on defecation, white mucus and a small amount of blood in the stool?
In a 66-year-old woman with diabetes mellitus on rosuvastatin 5 mg daily, LDL cholesterol 64 mg/dL and triglycerides 208 mg/dL, should the rosuvastatin dose be increased?
In a 66‑year‑old man with Gleason 6 prostate cancer treated with external‑beam radiation, what is the expected PSA trend after a recent PSA of 2.9 ng/mL?
How should I manage a 52‑year‑old obese woman with reactive hypoglycemia, including dietary measures and dosing of diazoxide (25 mg three times daily) and semaglutide (Wegovy) 0.25 mg weekly?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.