In a 66‑year‑old man with Gleason 6 prostate cancer treated with external‑beam radiation, what is the expected PSA trend after a recent PSA of 2.9 ng/mL?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 27, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Expected PSA Trend After External Beam Radiation for Gleason 6 Prostate Cancer

Following external beam radiation therapy for Gleason 6 prostate cancer, PSA should decline to ≤1.0 ng/mL within 16 months and ideally reach a nadir of ≤0.5 ng/mL within 18–30 months, with the current PSA of 2.9 ng/mL expected to continue trending downward over the next 1–2 years. 1

Expected PSA Kinetics After Radiation

  • PSA decline after external beam radiation is gradual and continues for 18–30 months post-treatment, unlike the immediate undetectable levels expected after radical prostatectomy. 1

  • The PSA nadir (lowest point) typically occurs at a median of 18–24 months after completing radiation therapy, though it may take up to 30 months in some patients. 2, 3

  • A PSA nadir of ≤0.5 ng/mL is associated with the highest probability of long-term biochemical control, with 95% 5-year disease-free survival and 84% 10-year disease-free survival. 3

  • Patients achieving a nadir of 0.5–0.9 ng/mL have approximately 60% 5-year biochemical control, while those with nadir 1.0–1.9 ng/mL have 50% control. 2

Prognostic Indicators for This Patient

  • For low-risk disease (Gleason 6, PSA initially low), the time to reach nadir is typically longer—often 2–3 years—compared to higher-risk disease. 2

  • Patients who take ≥2.0 years to reach a nadir of ≤0.4 ng/mL have the highest probability of cure, with 100% biochemical control in one series. 2

  • The current PSA of 2.9 ng/mL is within the expected range during the first 1–2 years post-radiation and should continue declining if treatment is successful. 1, 2

Surveillance Protocol

  • PSA should be measured every 6–12 months for the first 5 years, then annually thereafter. 1

  • Digital rectal examination should be performed annually, though it may be omitted if PSA remains stable and low. 1

  • The first follow-up visit should occur at 3 months post-treatment to establish baseline, then continue with regular monitoring. 1

Definition of Biochemical Failure

  • Biochemical recurrence after radiation is defined by the Phoenix Consensus criteria: a rise of ≥2.0 ng/mL above the PSA nadir. 1

  • Failure is determined "at call" (not backdated to the first PSA rise), meaning the date of failure is when the 2 ng/mL rise above nadir is documented. 1

  • Biochemical failure rarely occurs beyond 5 years post-treatment; only 6 of 136 at-risk patients failed after 5 years in one large series. 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not interpret transient PSA rises ("benign bounces") as treatment failure—these are common after brachytherapy and can occur with external beam radiation. 1

  • Do not initiate salvage therapy based on a single elevated PSA; confirm the trend with serial measurements showing consistent rise of ≥2 ng/mL above nadir. 1

  • Patients with lower pretreatment PSA and Gleason scores require longer follow-up (often 3–5 years) to achieve certainty of cure compared to higher-risk patients. 2

  • A PSA that remains elevated at 1.5–2.0 years post-treatment does not necessarily indicate failure if it is still declining; continue monitoring for up to 30 months before concluding treatment efficacy. 1, 2

Reassurance for This Patient

  • The current PSA of 2.9 ng/mL with a downward trend is consistent with successful treatment response, as the nadir has not yet been reached. 1, 2

  • Continue monitoring PSA every 6 months; expect further decline over the next 12–18 months to a goal nadir of ≤1.0 ng/mL, ideally ≤0.5 ng/mL. 1, 3

  • If PSA reaches ≤0.5 ng/mL and takes ≥2 years to reach this level, the probability of long-term biochemical cure approaches 100%. 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Prostate-specific antigen nadir: the optimum level after irradiation for prostate cancer.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 1996

Related Questions

When should PSA be rechecked in a 79‑year‑old man with Gleason 8 prostate cancer post external‑beam radiation therapy who is on continuous androgen‑deprivation therapy, last injection three months ago and PSA <0.1 ng/mL?
What is the recommended management for an 85-year-old patient with a history of prostate cancer, post-EBRT PSA of 0.36, and a recent PSA increase to 1.0?
What is the best course of action for an elderly man with prostate cancer and rising PSA levels after I-125 interstitial implant treatment?
What are the next steps for an elderly man with prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy (seed implantation) and a rising Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) level from 0.1 to 0.3?
What is the next step in management for a 76-year-old male with prostate cancer (Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)) levels trending downward after External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT)?
What is the likely diagnosis and first‑line management for a 24‑year‑old woman with hard stools, pain on defecation, white mucus and a small amount of blood in the stool?
What is the cardiac murmur grading system and how are the grades I through VI defined?
In a 66-year-old woman with diabetes mellitus on rosuvastatin 5 mg daily, LDL cholesterol 64 mg/dL and triglycerides 208 mg/dL, should the rosuvastatin dose be increased?
How should I manage a 52‑year‑old obese woman with reactive hypoglycemia, including dietary measures and dosing of diazoxide (25 mg three times daily) and semaglutide (Wegovy) 0.25 mg weekly?
How can fertility be improved in a 35-year-old male?
What is the preferred first‑line topical antibiotic for a mild localized bacterial infection of an ingrown toenail in an otherwise healthy adult?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.