What is the optimal wavelength for low-level laser therapy (LLLT) or photobiomodulation (PBM) using red light?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The best wavelength for red light therapy is 630 nm, as it has been shown to increase the depth of tumor necrosis by 72% compared to 405 nm, according to Monte Carlo simulations 1.

Key Considerations

  • Red light therapy with a wavelength of 630 nm is effective for skin conditions, wound healing, and surface-level concerns, as it penetrates skin tissue to a depth of about 8-10 mm.
  • Near-infrared light (810-850 nm) is better for pain relief and deeper tissue healing, as it penetrates deeper into the body, reaching muscles, bones, and joints.
  • The use of red light therapy with a wavelength of 630 nm has been supported by studies, including one that used low-level laser therapy with a wavelength of 650 nm to prevent oral mucositis in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy and total body irradiation, followed by autologous stem cell transplantation 1.

Treatment Parameters

  • Sessions typically last 10-20 minutes daily or every other day, with the light positioned 6-12 inches from the treatment area.
  • Higher-quality devices with proper wavelength specifications will provide more consistent results than generic "red light" products without specified wavelengths.

Clinical Evidence

  • A study published in the British Journal of Dermatology found that a wavelength of 630 nm was more effective than 405 nm in increasing the depth of tumor necrosis, according to Monte Carlo simulations 1.
  • Another study published in the International Journal of Oral Science discussed the use of photodynamic therapy with a wavelength of 630 nm ± 5 nm for the treatment of oral leucoplakia 1.

From the Research

Red Light Therapy Wavelengths

The best wavelength for red light therapy is a topic of ongoing research, with various studies investigating different wavelengths and their effects on the body.

  • A study published in 2017 2 discusses the use of red and near-infrared light for photobiomodulation, but does not specify a particular wavelength.
  • Another study from 2023 3 uses a wavelength of 630 ± 10 nm for red light photobiomodulation to reverse skin aging signs.
  • A 2017 study 4 compares the efficacy of 660 nm and 411 to 777 nm light-emitting devices for treating wrinkles, finding that both are effective but with slightly better results for the 660 nm group.
  • A 2019 study 5 investigates the effects of 630 nm red light on oxidative stress and memory restoration in SAMP8 mice, finding that it reduces oxidative stress and improves memory.
  • A 2016 study 6 examines the effects of red and infrared low-level laser therapy (660 nm and 780 nm) on oxidative stress during the muscle repair process, finding that both wavelengths can modulate oxidative stress and reduce muscle damage.

Wavelength Options

Based on these studies, some potential wavelengths for red light therapy include:

  • 630 nm, used in studies on skin aging and oxidative stress 3, 5
  • 660 nm, used in studies on wrinkle treatment and muscle repair 4, 6
  • 780 nm, used in a study on muscle repair 6 It is essential to note that the optimal wavelength may depend on the specific application and desired effects of the red light therapy.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Reverse skin aging signs by red light photobiomodulation.

Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI), 2023

Research

The Efficacy and Safety of 660 nm and 411 to 777 nm Light-Emitting Devices for Treating Wrinkles.

Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.], 2017

Related Questions

Is low-level laser therapy (LLLT) or photobiomodulation (PBM) effective for anti-aging?
What is the best red light therapy device for general use?
Does low-level laser therapy (LLLT) or photobiomodulation (PBM) reduce facial rhytides (wrinkles)?
Is red light therapy effective for removing fine lines and wrinkles?
What are the benefits of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) or photobiomodulation (PBM) using red light?
What is the next treatment option for a 65-year-old woman with a BRCA2 mutation and metastatic estrogen receptor (ER) negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) low breast cancer, who has previously received doxorubicin (Adriamycin) and cyclophosphamide (AC), docetaxel (Taxotere)/cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan), gemcitabine (Gemzar) and carboplatin (Carboplatin), and has progressed on olaparib (Lynparza)?
What is the efficacy of aspiration and injection for treating a dorsal wrist ganglion cyst?
What are the options for Malaria (Plasmodium infection) prophylaxis medication?
What is Central Venous Pressure (CVP) and its implications in diagnosing different types of shock?
Can straightening and reversal of normal cervical lordosis (cervical curvature) cause pain?
What is the diagnosis for a 44-year-old female with low ferritin (Ferritin) levels, indicating iron deficiency, hypoferritinemia, with corresponding laboratory results showing low iron (Iron) levels, elevated total iron-binding capacity (TIBC), low iron saturation, mild anemia as evidenced by low hemoglobin (Hb) levels, microcytic anemia as indicated by low mean corpuscular volume (MCV), low mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), low mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), elevated red cell distribution width (RDW), and thrombocytosis as indicated by elevated platelet count?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.