Does buprenorphine have a lower misuse risk than methadone for opioid use disorder?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Buprenorphine Has Lower Misuse Risk Than Methadone for Opioid Use Disorder

Buprenorphine has a lower potential for misuse compared to methadone in treating opioid use disorder, making it a safer option for many patients requiring medication-assisted treatment. 1

Pharmacological Properties Contributing to Lower Misuse Risk

Buprenorphine's safety advantage stems from its unique pharmacological properties:

  • Partial mu-opioid receptor agonist: Unlike methadone (a full agonist), buprenorphine has a ceiling effect on respiratory depression, significantly reducing overdose risk 1
  • High binding affinity: Buprenorphine strongly binds to opioid receptors, blocking effects of other opioids and reducing the rewarding effects of concurrent opioid use 1
  • Formulation advantages: The buprenorphine/naloxone combination (Suboxone) includes naloxone specifically to deter misuse by injection 1

Evidence Supporting Lower Misuse Potential

The American College of Physicians position paper notes that while both medications have misuse potential, buprenorphine has specific advantages 1:

  • The buprenorphine/naloxone formulation was specifically designed to mitigate misuse risk
  • Studies show similar mortality rates between buprenorphine and methadone, but with lower overall misuse potential for buprenorphine 1

A network meta-analysis found that buprenorphine had the highest probability (85%) of being the most effective treatment for opioid use disorder, compared to methadone (12.1%), suggesting better overall outcomes 1.

Clinical Considerations

When choosing between these medications, consider:

  1. Treatment setting requirements:

    • Methadone requires daily dosing at federally regulated treatment facilities
    • Buprenorphine can be prescribed in office-based settings, improving accessibility 1
  2. Formulation options:

    • Buprenorphine is available in sublingual tablets/films and long-acting injectable formulations
    • The buprenorphine/naloxone combination specifically reduces injection misuse risk 2, 3
  3. Patient factors affecting misuse risk:

    • Prior injection drug use history
    • Social stability and support system
    • Concurrent substance use disorders

Patterns of Misuse

Research shows that when buprenorphine is misused, it's often for different reasons than typical drug-seeking behavior 4:

  • Self-medication for withdrawal symptoms
  • As a substitute when preferred opioids are unavailable
  • Self-directed attempts to wean off stronger opioids

In contrast, methadone is more likely to be misused for its euphoric effects.

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  1. Diversion risk still exists: While lower than methadone, buprenorphine can still be diverted. Prescribers should implement appropriate monitoring strategies.

  2. Induction challenges: Patients must be in mild-to-moderate withdrawal before starting buprenorphine to avoid precipitated withdrawal.

  3. Access limitations: Despite advantages, buprenorphine remains underutilized due to:

    • Provider waiver requirements (though these have been modified recently)
    • Insurance restrictions
    • Limited number of waivered physicians 1
  4. Patient selection: Some patients with severe opioid use disorder may require the structure of daily observed dosing that methadone programs provide.

By considering these factors, clinicians can make informed decisions about which medication will provide the best balance of effectiveness and safety for patients with opioid use disorder.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.