What is aquablation therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Aquablation Therapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

Aquablation is a robotic-assisted surgical procedure that uses high-velocity water jets to remove prostate tissue in patients with BPH, providing similar symptom improvement to TURP with fewer sexual side effects. 1

What is Aquablation?

Aquablation is a surgical treatment for BPH that utilizes:

  • A robotic handpiece, console, and conformal planning unit (CPU)
  • High-velocity water jets for non-thermal ablation of obstructing prostatic tissue
  • Real-time transrectal ultrasound imaging for precise targeting
  • General anesthesia (not considered a minimally invasive surgical therapy)
  • Hemostasis achieved via electrocautery or catheter balloon traction after resection 1

The procedure involves:

  1. Treatment planning using ultrasound imaging to map the prostate anatomy
  2. Robotic delivery of high-velocity water jets to ablate the obstructing tissue
  3. Cystoscopic washout and hemostasis after ablation 2

Efficacy and Outcomes

Aquablation has demonstrated:

  • Similar symptom improvement to TURP through 12 months (RR 0.9 [95% CI 0.7 to 1.1]) 1
  • Sustained improvements in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life, and maximum flow rate (Qmax) through 36 months 1
  • At 36 months, mean IPSS improvement of 11.0 points (50% from baseline) and quality of life improvement of 49% from baseline 1
  • Similar maximum flow rate improvements compared to TURP at 12 months (10.3 vs. 10.6 mL/s) 1
  • Effective treatment for large prostates (80-150 mL) and those with intravesical median lobes 3, 4

Safety Profile and Advantages

Compared to TURP, Aquablation shows:

  • Fewer Clavien-Dindo grade 2 complications at 3 months (26% vs. 42%, p=0.015) 1
  • Significantly lower rates of retrograde ejaculation (6% vs. 23%, p=0.002) 1
  • Less sexual dysfunction (33% vs. 56% reporting worsening sexual function at 6 months, p=0.03) 1
  • Similar rates of other complications including bladder spasms, bleeding, dysuria, pain, and urethral damage 1
  • Less reduction in prostate volume at 3 months (31% vs. 44%, p=0.007) 1

Clinical Applications and Patient Selection

Aquablation is particularly beneficial for:

  • Patients concerned about preserving sexual function 1, 2
  • Men with larger prostates (30-150 mL) 4
  • Patients with intravesical median lobes 3

Limitations and Considerations

  • Requires general anesthesia unlike some minimally invasive options 1
  • Long-term durability beyond 3 years is still being established 5
  • Higher risk of complications in larger prostates, though still clinically acceptable 4
  • Received a Conditional Recommendation with Evidence Level Grade C from the American Urological Association 1

Comparison to Other BPH Treatments

The American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines position Aquablation as:

  • One of several surgical options for BPH treatment 1
  • Having similar efficacy to TURP but with better sexual function preservation 1
  • Not classified as a minimally invasive surgical therapy (MIST) due to the requirement for general anesthesia 1

Aquablation represents an important advancement in BPH treatment, offering a balance between effective symptom relief and preservation of sexual function, with particular benefits for men with larger prostates or those concerned about sexual side effects.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.