What is the treatment for Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)

The HLH-94 protocol, consisting of etoposide, dexamethasone, and cyclosporine A, is the recommended standard treatment for HLH, with individualized modifications based on the underlying trigger, disease severity, and patient characteristics. 1

Classification and Initial Approach

Treatment of HLH should be tailored based on:

  1. Patient stability and disease severity:

    • Clinically stable patients: Identify and treat the HLH trigger
    • Deteriorating/unstable patients: Start corticosteroids (±IVIG)
    • Transient HLH responding to disease-specific treatment: Monitor closely 1
  2. Type of HLH:

    • Primary (genetic) HLH: Requires full HLH-directed therapy followed by stem cell transplantation
    • Secondary HLH: Treatment depends on underlying cause (infection, malignancy, autoimmune disease)

Standard Treatment Protocol (HLH-94)

The HLH-94 protocol includes:

  • Etoposide: Highly effective against T-cell proliferation and cytokine secretion

    • Standard dose: 150 mg/m² twice weekly
    • For adults (especially elderly): Consider reduced frequency (once weekly) and/or reduced dose (50-100 mg/m²) 1
    • Cumulative dose should stay below 2-3 g/m², particularly in non-malignancy HLH 1
  • Dexamethasone: Suppresses inflammatory cytokine production

  • Cyclosporine A: Added after 8 weeks in HLH-94 (or upfront in HLH-2004)

    • Note: HLH-94 remains the recommended standard despite HLH-2004 modifications 1
  • Intrathecal therapy: Only for progressive neurological symptoms after 2 weeks or if abnormal CSF hasn't improved by then 1

Treatment Modifications Based on HLH Subtype

Malignancy-Associated HLH:

  • Consider combined HLH-directed and malignancy-directed approach
  • Etoposide has shown better survival compared to treatment directed only at underlying pathology 1
  • Lymphoma regimens containing etoposide, cyclophosphamide, or methotrexate may treat both HLH and the underlying neoplasm 1
  • Consider allogeneic stem cell transplantation for consolidation in malignancy-associated HLH 1

Infection-Associated HLH:

  • Aggressive treatment of the underlying infection is crucial
  • For EBV-driven HLH: Consider rituximab (anti-B-cell therapy) 1
  • Anti-infectious prophylaxis and screening (antifungal, pneumocystis jiroveci, aspergillus, EBV, CMV) 1

Autoimmune/Autoinflammatory HLH:

  • Anti-interleukin-1 treatment can be used in addition to standard therapy 1

Stem Cell Transplantation

  • Indications for allogeneic HSCT:

    • Primary (familial) HLH
    • Persistent or recurrent disease
    • High-risk malignancy-associated HLH 1
  • Conditioning regimens:

    • No clear superiority of reduced-intensity conditioning over myeloablative conditioning in adults 1
    • Inactive HLH before transplantation strongly associated with better survival 1

Salvage Therapy for Refractory HLH

For patients not responding to initial therapy:

  • Anti-CD52 antibody (alemtuzumab) 1
  • Cytokine adsorption using filter columns or plasma exchange
  • JAK2 inhibitor (ruxolitinib) (off-label)
  • Anti-IFN-γ antibody (emapalumab) 1

Monitoring Response to Treatment

Early response markers at day 7 of therapy predict outcomes:

  • Improvement in soluble CD25 (sCD25) of at least 25% from pre-therapy levels
  • Platelet count
  • Absolute lymphocyte count
  • Blood urea nitrogen 2

Prognosis

  • 5-year survival with HLH-94 protocol: approximately 54% 3
  • Primary HLH: 50% 5-year survival with HSCT; none survive without HSCT 3
  • Malignancy-associated HLH: 30-day survival 56-70%, with T-cell lymphoma having worse prognosis than B-cell lymphoma 1

Important Considerations and Pitfalls

  1. Early mortality risk factors:

    • Jaundice, edema, elevated creatinine 3
    • Failure to improve sCD25 levels by day 7 2
  2. Treatment challenges in adults:

    • Chronic comorbidities may increase vulnerability to cytokine storm and chemotherapy toxicity
    • Requires more individualized approach than in pediatric patients 4
  3. Interdisciplinary care:

    • Collaboration with rheumatologists, gastroenterologists, neurologists, transplant team, and pathologists is essential 4
  4. Common pitfalls:

    • Delayed diagnosis and treatment initiation
    • Failure to identify and treat underlying trigger
    • Inadequate monitoring of response markers
    • Not considering HSCT in appropriate cases

The heterogeneity of HLH in adults necessitates a disease- and risk-adapted treatment approach with continuous reassessment of therapeutic measures to improve outcomes in this life-threatening condition.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.