First-Line Treatment for Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer with PD-L1 >1
For patients with HER2-negative gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer with PD-L1 CPS ≥5, nivolumab in combination with fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy is the recommended first-line treatment. 1
Treatment Algorithm Based on PD-L1 Expression
For PD-L1 CPS ≥5:
- First choice: Nivolumab plus fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy
For PD-L1 CPS ≥10:
- Alternative option: Pembrolizumab plus fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy
For PD-L1 CPS 1-5:
- Case-by-case consideration: Nivolumab plus fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy 1
- Less robust evidence for this subgroup
- Consider patient factors including performance status and comorbidities
For PD-L1 CPS <1:
- Standard chemotherapy: Fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy without immunotherapy 1
- No demonstrated benefit of adding immunotherapy in this population
Evidence Quality and Considerations
Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy (CheckMate 649)
- Fewer GEJ patients (170 patients, 16% of study population) compared to gastric cancer patients 1
- OS results for PD-L1 CPS ≥5 showed HR of 0.82 (95% CI 0.58-1.16) for GEJ patients 1
- Significant PFS and ORR improvements in overall population with PD-L1 CPS ≥5 1
Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy (KEYNOTE-590)
- Subgroup analysis of 97 patients with esophageal or Siewert type 1 GEJ adenocarcinoma and PD-L1 CPS ≥10 1
- PFS benefit was significant (HR 0.49,95% CI 0.30-0.81) 1
- OS benefit showed trend but wide confidence interval (HR 0.83,95% CI 0.52-1.34) 1
- FDA approval for first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic esophageal/GEJ carcinoma in combination with platinum and fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy 2
Special Considerations
MSI-H Tumors
- Patients with MSI-H tumors show significant OS benefit with immunotherapy
- In CheckMate 649, MSI-H tumors (3% of patients) had HR 0.38 (95% CI 0.17-0.84) with nivolumab plus chemotherapy 1
- In KEYNOTE-062, MSI-H tumors (6.6% of patients) showed significant OS benefit with pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy 1
- Consider testing for MSI status to identify this highly responsive subgroup
Quality of Life Considerations
- Pembrolizumab maintained quality of life compared to chemotherapy alone 3
- Longer time to deterioration for nausea/vomiting with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy (HR 0.61,95% CI 0.44-0.85) 3
- Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events were significantly lower with pembrolizumab monotherapy (17%) compared to chemotherapy (69%) 4
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Not testing for PD-L1 expression: PD-L1 testing is essential for treatment selection as benefits vary significantly by CPS level
- Overlooking MSI status: MSI-H tumors have exceptional response to immunotherapy regardless of PD-L1 status
- Ignoring HER2 status: HER2 testing is mandatory as HER2-positive tumors have different first-line treatment recommendations
- Using incorrect PD-L1 cutoffs: Different immunotherapy agents have different recommended PD-L1 cutoff values for optimal benefit
In summary, for GEJ cancer with PD-L1 CPS >1, the treatment approach should be stratified based on the exact PD-L1 CPS level, with nivolumab plus chemotherapy being the preferred option for CPS ≥5 and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy being an alternative for CPS ≥10. For CPS 1-5, the decision to add immunotherapy should be made on a case-by-case basis, while standard chemotherapy remains appropriate for CPS <1.