Management of Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction After Stent Dislodgement
Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery is the recommended treatment for a patient with nasolacrimal duct obstruction after a stent has fallen out 2.5 years post-trauma.
Assessment of the Current Condition
When evaluating a patient whose nasolacrimal duct pin/stent has fallen out after 2.5 years, the following assessment should be performed:
- Functional evaluation of the nasolacrimal tear drainage system 1
- Assessment for symptoms of epiphora (excessive tearing)
- Examination for signs of infection or inflammation
- Evaluation of the puncta and canaliculi for patency
Treatment Algorithm
Confirm Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction
- Perform slit-lamp examination
- Assess tear film and tear meniscus height
- Consider diagnostic tests such as dye disappearance test or dacryocystography
Determine Treatment Approach
- For confirmed nasolacrimal duct obstruction after stent loss:
- Primary recommendation: Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR)
- This is superior to attempting replacement of the stent, which has lower long-term success rates 2
- For confirmed nasolacrimal duct obstruction after stent loss:
Surgical Considerations
- External DCR has 85-95% success rate 2
- Endonasal approaches may be considered to avoid external scarring
- Concurrent management of any associated conditions (e.g., chronic dacryocystitis)
Rationale for DCR Over Stent Replacement
The evidence strongly favors DCR over stent replacement for several reasons:
- Long-term success rates with polyurethane nasolacrimal stents are low compared to external DCR 2
- Patients with stents often continue to experience tearing despite a patent lacrimal system 2
- The stent has already been in place for 2.5 years, suggesting the underlying condition is not likely to resolve without definitive surgery
- Many patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction have concomitant conditions like chronic dacryocystitis that may need surgical addressing 1
Post-Operative Management
After DCR surgery:
- Follow-up within 1-2 weeks to assess surgical site
- Monitor for complete resolution of epiphora
- Evaluate for potential complications such as:
- Infection
- Scarring of the surgical ostium
- Recurrent obstruction
Potential Complications and Pitfalls
Stent Replacement Pitfalls: If stent replacement is attempted instead of DCR, be aware that:
DCR Complications to Monitor:
- Bleeding
- Infection
- Scarring of the surgical ostium
- Failure to resolve symptoms
Special Considerations
For patients who absolutely refuse surgery or are poor surgical candidates:
- Consider balloon dacryoplasty as an intermediate option, though success rates are lower than DCR 4
- Be aware that interventional procedures with new stent designs show technical success rates of 97.1%, but long-term success rates decline to 91.4% after 12 months 5
The evidence clearly demonstrates that external DCR provides the most reliable and durable solution for nasolacrimal duct obstruction after stent dislodgement, with success rates of 85-95% compared to the more modest long-term outcomes with stent replacement.