What is the recommended follow-up for a thyroid nodule classified as Bethesda II (Benign) after fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Follow-Up Management for Bethesda II (Benign) Thyroid Nodules

For thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda II (Benign) after fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), regular ultrasound monitoring at 6-12 month intervals initially, then annually if stable, is recommended. 1

Initial Follow-Up Protocol

  • First follow-up ultrasound: 6-12 months after benign FNAC
  • Subsequent follow-up: Annually if nodule remains stable
  • Duration of follow-up: At least 3-5 years

Indications for Repeat FNAC

Repeat FNAC should be performed if any of the following occur during follow-up:

  1. Significant growth in the previously benign nodule

    • Growth defined as >20% increase in at least two dimensions or >50% increase in volume
  2. Development of suspicious sonographic features:

    • Hypoechogenicity
    • Microcalcifications
    • Irregular or microlobulated margins
    • Taller-than-wide shape
    • Extrathyroidal extension
  3. Initial cytology was inadequate or non-diagnostic

Risk Stratification Based on Ultrasound Features

The ACR TI-RADS (Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System) can be used to further stratify follow-up recommendations:

  • ACR TI-RADS 3 nodules (low suspicion):

    • Have excellent negative predictive value (94.6-100%) 2
    • Consider longer intervals between follow-up ultrasounds (12-18 months)
  • ACR TI-RADS 4 and 5 nodules (moderate to high suspicion):

    • Despite benign cytology, have higher risk of malignancy (6.1% and 66.7% respectively) 2
    • Require more vigilant follow-up (every 6 months initially)

Evidence Supporting Follow-Up Recommendations

The malignancy rate for nodules with benign cytology (Bethesda II) is generally low. Studies show malignancy rates of:

  • 3.2% in pre-Bethesda period
  • 2.6% in post-Bethesda period 3

This low malignancy rate supports the safety of ultrasound follow-up rather than immediate intervention for Bethesda II nodules.

Special Considerations

  • Small (<1.5 cm) nodules with high-suspicion features: Despite benign cytology, nodules with ACR TI-RADS 4 and 5 features that are <1.5 cm may still carry malignancy risk (5.7% and 25.0% respectively) 2

  • Highly suspicious nodules: For nodules with highly suspicious features on ultrasound (ACR TI-RADS 5) but benign cytology, consider repeat FNAC sooner (within 3-6 months) rather than waiting for growth 3

  • Patient risk factors: More vigilant follow-up may be warranted for patients with:

    • History of head and neck radiation
    • Family history of thyroid cancer
    • Suspicious clinical features

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Relying solely on FNAC results when clinical or sonographic findings are worrisome

    • Clinical context must always be considered 1
  2. Failure to have cytology reviewed by a pathologist with expertise in thyroid disorders

    • This can lead to inaccurate diagnoses 1
  3. Discontinuing follow-up too early

    • Some malignancies may grow slowly and become apparent only after several years
  4. Ignoring patient symptoms

    • Even with benign cytology, new symptoms like voice changes, dysphagia, or rapid growth should prompt re-evaluation

By following these evidence-based recommendations for the follow-up of Bethesda II thyroid nodules, clinicians can effectively monitor patients while minimizing unnecessary procedures and optimizing outcomes related to morbidity, mortality, and quality of life.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.