What is the management approach for a patient with atrial fibrillation (AF) who presents to the emergency department (ED)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Atrial Fibrillation in the Emergency Department

Patients with atrial fibrillation presenting to the emergency department should first be assessed for hemodynamic stability, with immediate synchronized electrical cardioversion for unstable patients and rate control with beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers for stable patients, followed by anticoagulation based on stroke risk assessment. 1

Initial Assessment

Hemodynamic Stability Evaluation

  • Immediately check for:
    • Hypotension
    • Altered mental status
    • Chest pain
    • Shortness of breath
    • Signs of shock
  • Obtain vital signs
  • Place patient on continuous cardiac monitoring
  • Establish IV access
  • Obtain 12-lead ECG
  • Draw blood for laboratory tests 1

Diagnostic Workup

  • ECG to confirm AF rhythm
  • Basic laboratory tests: complete blood count, electrolytes, renal function, thyroid function
  • Chest radiograph if pulmonary symptoms present
  • Echocardiogram to assess cardiac structure and function, particularly in hemodynamically compromised patients 2, 1

Management Algorithm

For Hemodynamically Unstable Patients

  1. Immediate synchronized electrical cardioversion 2, 1
    • Prepare emergency equipment
    • Administer oxygen as needed
    • Pre-medicate for sedation if time permits
    • Class I recommendation for patients with acute AF accompanied by symptoms or signs of hemodynamic instability 2

For Hemodynamically Stable Patients

  1. Rate Control Strategy (First-line approach)

    • Beta-blockers (first choice):

      • Metoprolol: 2.5-5 mg IV bolus over 2 minutes, may repeat up to 3 doses
      • Esmolol: 500 mcg/kg IV over 1 min, then 60-200 mcg/kg/min IV infusion 1
    • Calcium channel blockers (alternative first choice):

      • Diltiazem: 0.25 mg/kg IV over 2 minutes, followed by infusion at 5-15 mg/hour
      • Verapamil: 0.075-0.15 mg/kg IV over 2 minutes 1
    • Target heart rate: <110 bpm at rest 1

    • Cautions:

      • Avoid AV nodal blocking agents in suspected Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome 1
      • Use beta-blockers cautiously in heart failure, asthma, or COPD 1
      • Avoid calcium channel blockers in decompensated heart failure 1
      • Do not use digoxin as the sole agent for paroxysmal AF (Class III recommendation) 2, 1
  2. Rhythm Control Considerations

    • Consider if:

      • First episode of AF
      • Patient is symptomatic despite adequate rate control
      • Patient is young
      • Difficulty achieving adequate rate control 1
    • Options:

      • Synchronized electrical cardioversion
      • Pharmacological cardioversion with flecainide, amiodarone, or propafenone 1
      • Direct-current cardioversion has higher success rates (78.2%) compared to pharmacological cardioversion (59.2%) 3
  3. Anticoagulation Strategy

    • Acute setting:

      • For AF duration >48 hours or unknown duration: anticoagulate for at least 3-4 weeks before and after cardioversion (INR 2-3) 2
      • For AF <48 hours: can safely cardiovert without prolonged anticoagulation 4
      • Alternative approach: transesophageal echocardiography to exclude left atrial thrombus followed by prompt cardioversion 4
    • Long-term anticoagulation:

      • Guided by CHA₂DS₂-VASc score 1
      • Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) preferred over vitamin K antagonists if no contraindications 1, 5
      • For patients with high stroke risk (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2), anticoagulation is recommended 1, 6

Disposition Considerations

  • Factors favoring discharge:

    • Successful rate or rhythm control
    • Hemodynamically stable
    • No significant comorbidities
    • Adequate follow-up arranged 7, 5
  • Factors favoring admission:

    • Persistent hemodynamic instability
    • Inadequate rate control
    • Significant comorbidities (heart failure, recent MI)
    • First episode of AF requiring further evaluation 7

Special Considerations

  • Reversible causes: Identify and treat underlying causes (thyroid disease, electrolyte abnormalities, alcohol consumption) 2, 1

  • Monitoring: For discharged patients, arrange follow-up within 1-2 weeks for reassessment of rhythm, rate control, and anticoagulation status 2

  • Quality of life: Regular assessment of functional status and quality of life is important due to the impact of AF on patient outcomes 1

The management of AF in the emergency department requires a systematic approach focusing on hemodynamic stability, rate or rhythm control, and stroke prevention. By following this evidence-based algorithm, emergency physicians can effectively manage this common arrhythmia while minimizing complications and improving patient outcomes.

References

Guideline

Atrial Fibrillation Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation.

The American journal of medicine, 1998

Research

Emergency medicine updates: Atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response.

The American journal of emergency medicine, 2023

Research

Emergency medicine considerations in atrial fibrillation.

The American journal of emergency medicine, 2018

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.