What is the recommended approach for documenting a low back pain assessment?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Recommended Approach for Documenting Low Back Pain Assessment

Documentation of low back pain assessment should follow a structured approach that categorizes patients into one of three broad categories: nonspecific low back pain, back pain potentially associated with radiculopathy or spinal stenosis, or back pain potentially associated with another specific spinal cause. 1

Essential Documentation Components

1. History Documentation

  • Pain characteristics:

    • Onset (sudden vs. gradual)
    • Duration (acute < 4 weeks, subacute 4-12 weeks, chronic > 12 weeks)
    • Location and radiation pattern
    • Quality (sharp, dull, burning, etc.)
    • Severity (0-10 scale)
    • Aggravating and alleviating factors
    • Previous episodes and treatments
  • Red flags (document presence or absence):

    • Age > 50 years or < 20 years
    • History of cancer
    • Unexplained weight loss
    • Fever or chills
    • Recent infection
    • Immunosuppression
    • IV drug use
    • Prolonged corticosteroid use
    • Significant trauma
    • Saddle anesthesia
    • Bladder/bowel dysfunction
    • Progressive neurological deficits 1, 2
  • Yellow flags (psychosocial risk factors):

    • Negative attitudes/beliefs about pain
    • Fear-avoidance behaviors
    • Catastrophizing
    • Depression or anxiety
    • Work-related problems
    • Compensation issues 1, 3

2. Physical Examination Documentation

  • General observation:

    • Gait pattern
    • Posture
    • Pain behaviors
  • Spine examination:

    • Inspection for deformity, asymmetry
    • Palpation for tenderness, muscle spasm
    • Range of motion (flexion, extension, lateral bending, rotation)
    • Pain with movement
  • Neurological assessment:

    • Motor strength (grade 0-5)
    • Sensory testing (light touch, pinprick)
    • Deep tendon reflexes (0-4+)
    • Straight leg raise test and crossed straight leg raise
    • Femoral stretch test (for upper lumbar radiculopathy) 1, 3

3. Functional Assessment Documentation

  • Impact on activities of daily living
  • Work limitations
  • Sleep disturbances
  • Functional goals 3

Documentation of Diagnostic Category

Based on the history and physical examination, document which of the three categories the patient falls into:

  1. Nonspecific low back pain: Most common (85% of cases); no specific pathoanatomical cause identified

  2. Back pain potentially associated with radiculopathy or spinal stenosis:

    • Document specific neurological findings
    • Note dermatomal distribution of symptoms
    • Document positive provocative tests
  3. Back pain potentially associated with another specific spinal cause:

    • Document specific suspected diagnosis
    • Note red flags that led to this suspicion 1

Imaging and Diagnostic Testing Documentation

  • Document rationale for ordering or not ordering imaging studies:

    • No imaging for nonspecific low back pain (strong recommendation) 1
    • Imaging indicated only for:
      • Severe/progressive neurologic deficits
      • Suspected serious underlying condition based on red flags
      • Persistent symptoms with radiculopathy/stenosis if surgery or epidural injection is being considered 1, 3
  • When documenting imaging orders, specify:

    • Type of imaging (MRI preferred for neurological symptoms)
    • Clinical question to be answered
    • Red flags or specific indications 3

Treatment Plan Documentation

  • Document evidence-based information provided to patient about:

    • Expected course of low back pain
    • Importance of remaining active
    • Self-care options 1
  • Medication plan (if prescribed):

    • First-line: Acetaminophen or NSAIDs
    • Document assessment of:
      • Baseline pain severity
      • Functional deficits
      • Potential benefits and risks
      • Consideration of comorbidities 1, 3
  • Non-pharmacologic therapies (as appropriate):

    • For acute pain: Spinal manipulation
    • For chronic/subacute pain: Document recommendation for:
      • Exercise therapy
      • Intensive interdisciplinary rehabilitation
      • Acupuncture
      • Massage therapy
      • Spinal manipulation
      • Yoga
      • Cognitive-behavioral therapy
      • Progressive relaxation 1

Follow-up Plan Documentation

  • Document specific timeframe for follow-up
  • Criteria for earlier reassessment
  • Specific goals to assess at follow-up
  • Plan if symptoms persist beyond 6 weeks 3

Risk Stratification Documentation

  • Consider documenting STarT Back tool results to categorize patients into:
    • Low risk: Self-management plan
    • Medium risk: Physiotherapy referral with patient-centered plan
    • High risk: Comprehensive biopsychosocial assessment 3

Common Documentation Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Failing to document assessment of red flags
  • Incomplete neurological examination documentation
  • Ordering imaging without documenting specific indications
  • Vague treatment plans without specific goals
  • Missing documentation of psychosocial factors that may influence recovery 1, 3

By following this structured documentation approach, clinicians can ensure comprehensive assessment of low back pain that guides appropriate management and improves patient outcomes.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Red flags of low back pain.

JAAPA : official journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants, 2020

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach and Management of Low Back Pain

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.