Does abstinence from sex increase the risk of prostate cancer or diseases?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Sexual Activity and Prostate Cancer Risk

Moderate ejaculation frequency (2-4 times per week) is associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer, suggesting that sexual abstinence is not beneficial for prostate health. 1

Relationship Between Sexual Activity and Prostate Cancer

Evidence on Ejaculation Frequency

  • A dose-response meta-analysis found that moderate ejaculation frequency (2-4 times per week) was significantly associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer (OR 0.91,95% CI 0.87-0.96) 1
  • Frequent ejaculation appears to be protective against the development of prostate cancer rather than increasing risk 2
  • There is no evidence supporting that sexual abstinence is beneficial for prostate health; in fact, the evidence suggests the opposite 1

Other Sexual Activity Factors and Prostate Cancer Risk

  • The number of sexual partners shows a linear dose-response relationship with prostate cancer risk - an increment of 10 female sexual partners was associated with a 1.10-fold increase in prostate cancer risk (OR 1.10,95% CI 1.01-1.21) 1
  • Age at first intercourse also shows a significant association - the risk of prostate cancer decreased by 4% for every 5-year delay in age at first intercourse (OR 0.96,95% CI 0.92-0.99) 1
  • Multiple sexual partners may have a protective effect against prostate cancer, excluding the risk of sexually transmitted infections 2

Quality of Evidence and Limitations

  • Most studies on sexual activity and prostate cancer risk are case-control studies rather than prospective cohort studies, which limits the ability to establish causality 1
  • There is insufficient agreement in survey design and data reporting across studies examining masturbation and prostate cancer risk 3
  • The evidence regarding sexual activity's impact on prostate cancer is less robust compared to other lifestyle factors such as smoking and physical activity 4

Other Lifestyle Factors Affecting Prostate Cancer Risk

Physical Activity

  • Evidence supports that exercise might be a useful factor in the prevention of prostate cancer and tumor progression 4
  • An active lifestyle is recommended as it may improve cancer-related outcomes 4

Smoking

  • While data on smoking and prostate cancer development are conflicting, there is robust evidence that smoking is associated with aggressive tumor features and worse cancer-related outcomes 4
  • The negative impact of smoking appears to persist for up to 10 years after cessation 4

Clinical Implications

  • Sexual rehabilitation should be addressed by the primary care team for men with prostate cancer, as treatments often lead to sexual dysfunction 5
  • Sexual partners should be included in brief sexual counseling, even when mechanical treatments for erectile dysfunction are prescribed 5
  • Modification of sexual activity factors appears to be a useful low-risk approach to potentially decreasing the risk of prostate cancer 1

Conclusion for Clinical Practice

  • Moderate sexual activity with regular ejaculation (2-4 times per week) may be beneficial for prostate health 1
  • Sexual abstinence does not appear to provide any protective benefit against prostate cancer and may potentially increase risk 2, 1
  • Patients should be advised that maintaining moderate sexual activity is part of a healthy lifestyle that may contribute to prostate health 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.